Barely Significant
← all phrases

“nominally significant”

7,733 sentences · 7,733 papers · 10,034 search hits before verification · confirmed specimen

Sighted at

p=0.08

Listed by Hankins (2013) · Otte et al. (2022)

In the literature

nominally significantp = 0.0270.5× alphagold
Post hoc tests for each picture valence category separately revealed that the HC-yes group recalled significantly more positive pictures ( t (2167) = −3.78, p = 0.0002, d = −0.16) and nominally significant more negative pictures ( t (2167) = −2.22, p = 0.027, d = −0.10) in the memory task compared to the HC-no group.
nominally significantp=0·0270.5× alphagold
In sensitivity analyses excluding variants from each gene region in turn ( appendix p 20 ), the association with all-cause mortality in the deficient stratum was attenuated, but remained nominally significant when excluding variants in the CYP2R1 gene region from the analysis (OR 0·80 [95% CI 0·66–0·98]; p=0·027).
nominally significantp = 0.0270.5× alphagold
When PRS calculation was restricted to BD variants with genome-wide significance ( p -value threshold 5×10 −8 ), the PRS of BD cases from the two Cuban families showed a nominally significant increase compared to the PRS of family members with no psychiatric disorder or a non-BD psychiatric phenotype ( p = 0.027, S2B Fig ).
nominally significantP = 0.0280.6× alphagold
In single marker tests of the SNPs that make up the risk score, we found a nominally significant association with rs943080 in VEGFA within the AREDS dataset ( P = 0.028; Table 2 ); this does not replicate in the CWRU/HIHG dataset.
Genetic Association Analysis of Drusen Progression.
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci · 2016 · PMC4849854
nominally significantP = 0.0280.6× alphagold
Out of the nine probes at which Noor and colleagues found an association between cord blood DNA methylation and paternal periconceptional BMI, only one showed a nominally significant association in consistent effect direction in the sperm obesity EWAS ( P = 0.028, DNA methylation difference = 6%) and the combined mixed effects model in blood and sperm ( P = 0.01, DNA methylation difference = 4%).
nominally significantP =0.0280.6× alphagold
They found nominally significant allelic association in case of the catechol-O-methyltransferase rs362204 -/G ( P =0.028) marker, nominally significant genotypic associations for tyrosine hydroxylase rs6356 A/G ( P =0.04) and dopamine beta-hydroxylase rs1108580 A/G ( P =0.025) following the case-control approach.