Barely Significant
← all phrases

“nominally significant”

7,733 sentences · 7,733 papers · 10,034 search hits before verification · confirmed specimen

Sighted at

p=0.08

Listed by Hankins (2013) · Otte et al. (2022)

In the literature

Three loci, BIN1 (rs4663105 in Jansen et al .; rs6733839 in Kunkle et al .) with elevated risk in females, KAT8 (rs59735493 in Jansen et al .) with elevated risk in males and FERMT2 (rs17125924 in Kunkle et al .) with elevated risk in males, showed nominally significant (p inter < 0.05) sex-specific AD association.
Following Bonferroni correction, a significance level of P < 0.008 (0.05/6) was considered statistically significant, while P values between 0.008 and 0.05 were considered nominally significant. 3 Results 3.1 IVs After the screening process, a total of 60 IVs were used for left-hand grip strength, and 98 IVs were used for right-hand grip strength.
Effect sizes were significantly different from zero in food parenting practices for regular timing of meals and snacks (PE = 1·08, se = 0·27,95 % CI (0·61, 2·00)) that survived multiplicity correction, as well as nominally significant effects on reducing distractions during mealtimes (PE = -0·79, se = 0·29, 95 % CI (−1·52, −0·19)), less use of food as a reward (PE = -0·54, se = 0·25, 95 % CI (−1·35, −0·04)) and providing an autonomy-supportive feeding environment (PE = 0·73, se = 0·28, 95 % CI (0·18, 1·51)) (Table 4 ).
Among 45 genetic variants tested, they found four genetic variants – rs266729 ( ADIPOQ ), rs601737 ( HNF4A ), rs5215 ( KCNJ11 ) and rs7177055 ( HMG20A ) – three of which are related to insulin secretion, showed nominally significant associations with postpartum abnormal glucose tolerance 10 .
Blood glucose control: Where are we?
J Diabetes Investig · 2021 · PMC8504917
Exploratory mediation analysis of a nominally significant taxon Although no microbial taxa showed a statistically significant association with both TTK inhibition and BC after FDR correction, the authors conducted a purely exploratory analysis on Genus Anaerostipes id.1991, which showed the strongest nominal signals in both steps (TTK inhibition → Anaerostipes : OR = 1.399, 95 % CI 1.117‒1.753, uncorrected p = 0.003; Anaerostipes → BC: OR = 0.862, 95 % CI 0.757‒0.982, uncorrected p = 0.025).
Among the 20 OMIM derived gene-lists (CNS+ above 19), for the 78 sb-RPD gene set, statistically significant overrepresentation at p < 0.0025 (0.05/20) was noted for gene lists annotated with clinical synopsis terms ‘central nervous system’ (p cor = 0.026), ‘head and neck’ (p cor = 0.037), and a nominally significant overrepresentation for ‘peripheral nervous system (0.057) (Supplement S2 and S3 and Supplementary Table 4 ).
SNPs that passed region-specific significance thresholds for respective traits and/or the highest nominally significant SNP of each trait for each trait are shown in Tables 2 and 3 .