Barely Significant
← all phrases

“nominally significant”

7,733 sentences · 7,733 papers · 10,034 search hits before verification · confirmed specimen

Sighted at

p=0.08

Listed by Hankins (2013) · Otte et al. (2022)

In the literature

nominally significantp = 0.0150.3× alphagold
A nominally significant difference emerged between neutral and incongruent reflexives, t (50.9) = -2.52, p = 0.015, d z = −0.41, 95% CI [−0.74, −0.08], though given the exploratory nature of this analysis and the absence of a theoretically motivated account for this pattern in bound-variable contexts, this result should be interpreted cautiously.
nominally significantp = .0150.3× alphagold
Meta-analysis of polygenic score associations across the three prospectively assessed cohorts (Janssen, Douglas Biomarker Study, and IRL-GREY study) showed nominally significant evidence of association for the remission polygenic score (maximum liability R 2 = 0.8%, p = .015) and a nonsignificant association for the percentage improvement score (maximum R 2 = 0.2%, p = .091) ( Figure S21 in Supplement 1 ).
Identifying the Common Genetic Basis of Antidepressant Response.
Biol Psychiatry Glob Open Sci · 2022 · PMC9117153
nominally significantP = 0.0150.3× alphagold
In meta-analysis, only the HLA-DQB1 variant showed a nominally significant independent replication for a variant in HLA-DQB1 (OR = 15.6, P = 0.015, positive predictive value = 35.1), while a novel variant in rs149104283, an intronic transcript of SLCO1B3 and SLCO1B7 , was associated with CIAG (OR = 4.32, P = 1.79 × 10 −8 ) (Legge et al. 2017 ), but was not replicated in a Japanese sample (Saito et al. 2017 ).
nominally significantp = 0.0150.3× alphagold
In the younger group, there were nominally significant weak correlations between the ACC interference effect and the connectivity between the FPN and the DAN (Spearman's ρ: −0.44, p = 0.015) and between the FPN and the DMN (Spearman's ρ: 0.38, p = 0.039), but these would not survive more stringent correction for multiple testing.
nominally significantp ≤0.0150.3× alphagold
To further explore the potential target of these two variants, GTEx eQTL data for normal ovarian tissue were queried and nominally significant ( p ≤0.015; Supplementary Table 4 ) associations were observed between lower MEF2D expression and the minor alleles of both variants, but not with expression of the neighboring IQGAP3 gene.
nominally significantp = 0.0150.3× alphagold
Analysis of previous associated SNPs in different LD-Blocks, located intronic (rs9804190 and rs10761482) or 30 kb downstream of ANK3 (rs10994336) found a nominally significant association of SNP rs10761482 with bipolar disorder (p = 0.015, OR 1.304) but not with schizophrenia (table 1 and 2 ).
nominally significantp = 0.0150.3× alphagold
The CHRN Variants May Regulate the Expression of CHRN Genes ( Table 4 ) Cis- eQTL analysis showed that 13 risk SNPs at CHRNB3-CHRNA6 had nominally significant cis- acting regulatory effects on CHRNB3 mRNA expression in cerebellar cortex and thalamus ( p = 0.015–0.022 and 0.026–0.031, respectively), and on CHRNA6 mRNA expression in frontal cortex and hippocampus ( p = 0.042–0.043 and 0.027–0.033, respectively).
nominally significantP =0.0150.3× alphagold
Stratifying by quartiles of the genetic score, we only found a nominally significant effect of quantile 4 compared with quantile 1 of the score on FA (OR, 0.73; 95% CI, 0.57–0.94; P =0.015).Odds ratios±SE for WMH, FA, and MD based on the quartiles of the genetic score were plotted (Figures I through III in the online-only Data Supplement ).
nominally significantp = 0.0150.3× alphagold
Results Associations with fasting glucose Of the 16 SNPs studied, 12 displayed β-values with the same direction of effect as that seen in Europeans, and the SLC30A8 rs11558471 variant displayed a nominally significant association with fasting glucose levels (β = 0.063 [95% CI: 0.013, 0.113] p = 0.015) ( Figure 1 ).
nominally significantp = 0.0150.3× alphagold
Consistent with the prolongation of total sleep duration in the shortest night, a nominally significant effect was also seen for the total duration in bed during the night ( p = 0.015, r = 0.40) with an estimated increase in time in bed of 0.99 h (59 min) in the verum group compared to the placebo group (Table 2 ).