Barely Significant
← all phrases

“nominally significant”

7,733 sentences · 7,733 papers · 10,034 search hits before verification · confirmed specimen

Sighted at

p=0.08

Listed by Hankins (2013) · Otte et al. (2022)

In the literature

Robust gene signatures of kidney aging and their correlation with functional and structural dimensions of kidney health Of 19 replicated genes, 14 showed at least 1 nominally significant association with 1 of 5 biochemical or histologic measures of renal functional and structural integrity known to deteriorate with age (i.e., estimated glomerular filtration rate, glomerulosclerosis, tubular atrophy, interstitial fibrosis, and arterial/arteriolar narrowing) in up to 160 individuals from the TRANSLATE Study ( Supplementary Tables S10–S14 , Figure 2 , and Supplementary Figure S2 ).
In the phase 2 study of tirasemtiv, no efficacy signal was seen in ALSFRS-R, although a key secondary end point, SVC, showed a nominally significant benefit. 9 , 11 , 12 SVC was the primary end point of the phase 3 tirasemtiv study; negative results were believed to reflect poor tolerability, as a per protocol post hoc analysis again suggested a benefit. 11 In the FORTITUDE-ALS trial, the phase 2 study of reldesemtiv, SVC was the primary outcom
For the secondary endpoint of time to viral clearance, despite randomization being a median of 11 days after symptom onset for both opaganib and placebo cohorts, opaganib demonstrated a nominally significant improvement as compared to placebo, with a hazard ratio of 1.34 and a nominal p -value of 0.043 as shown in Figure 2 (and Table 3 ).
Changes in brain vMRI (ml, %) detected by boundary shift integral (BSI) 42 , an analytic method employed in other HD studies 21 – 23 , 43 , showed a nominally significant 26% reduction in caudate atrophy for EM subjects (PEPI, n = 90; PBO, n = 88) treated with pepinemab relative to placebo, and the percentage change from baseline at month 17 resulted in LS mean difference (95% CI) = −1.54 (−2.79, −0.29) (two-sided P = 0.017; Fig. 2a and Extended Data Table 4 ).
Statistical power for the nominally significant MR estimates was calculated using the mRnd online calculator ( https://shiny.cnsgenomics.com/mRnd/ ), incorporating the sample size of the outcome GWAS, the proportion of variance in the exposure explained by the IVs (R2), and the observed odds ratio, with a Type-I error rate (α) set at 0.05 [ 33 ].