Barely Significant
← all phrases

“nominally significant”

7,733 sentences · 7,733 papers · 10,034 search hits before verification · confirmed specimen

Sighted at

p=0.08

Listed by Hankins (2013) · Otte et al. (2022)

In the literature

Including these nominally significant signatures present in controls would provide us some suggestive evidence of detection, though caution should be used for potential false positives brought by multiple comparison.
The ovarian cancer oncobiome.
Oncotarget · 2017 · PMC5482651
Combined QNTS and QLSCD sample As 4,028,157 polymorphisms were shared and the phenotypic distribution did not differ between the two cohorts (Mann-Whitney U test = 132,241.000, SE = 4,945.508, p = 0.925 and Mann-Whitney U test = 128,134.500, SE = 4,946.462, p = 0.356 for pain problems and anxiety symptoms, respectively), we merged the genomic regions for which we found nominally significant results in both the QNTS and QLSCD to achieve stronger statistical power and thus test the robustness of the previous findings.
Preliminary analysis not including any covariates showed nominally significant associations between IgE to egg ≥0.35 kU/l and IgE to the egg component ovomucoid ≥0.35 kU/l and positive oral egg challenge result (p-values 0.028 and 0.028 respectively).
4th Pediatric Allergy and Asthma Meeting (PAAM)
Clin Transl Allergy · 2016 · PMC5123301
31 Indeed, Cystatin C remained the most strongly associated with rDNA CN in a multivariate linear model including all blood biochemistry biomarkers related to renal function simultaneously, regardless of whether they appeared as nominally significant on their own ( Figure S16 A; this occurs both with and without C-Reactive Protein, a well-established marker of inflammation, as a covariate).
Bonferroni correction was applied to account for the multiple testing, where P ‐value <.005 was regarded as statistically significant and P ‐value <.05 was regarded as nominally significant. 3 RESULTS 3.1 Characteristics of the study participants A total of 113 256 participants were included in the analysis, including 165 EOCRC and 719 EOCRA cases.
Moreover, among the 203 proteins that were nominally significant prior to multiple testing correction, 30 proteins exhibited a monotonic trend across disease progression, with 25 showing a stepwise increase and five showing a stepwise decrease in their mean abundance from HC → iRBD → PD ( Figure 2 B, Supplementary Tables S4 and S5 ).