“nominally significant”

Although the κ values showed nominally significant heterogeneity for four of the laboratories, there was trend toward decreasing levels of κ as the elapsed time increased only for the TCP and tetramer labs.

A two-sided p -value < 0.05 was considered nominally significant. 3.

Both loci showed nominally significant association in both the Spanish and Italian subanalyses ( Table 2 ).

We identified three genes with nominally significant p-values: NOD2 , RTKN2 , and MGAT3 .

All genes had at least nominally significant SNP annotations in both the discovery and replication results; when ranking these candidate gene variants by the lowest P-values, DPP10 was the top gene in the discovery set, while HDAC9 was the top gene in the replication set ( S2 Table ).

Similarly, the nominally significant risk observed in the 50–59 age group might reflect peak career and family responsibilities, midlife weight gain, and higher prevalence of metabolic syndrome.

Added to that, we discovered an inverse correlation that is nominally significant between the content of PM 2.5 and FGF-21 in both the UVMR and MVMR models.

A few nominally significant correlations were indicated, including lung cancer with white blood cell (leukocyte) counts (Additional file 1 : Table S13; and Additional file 2 : Fig.

Results with P ≤ 0.05 were considered nominally significant.

Results Across 720 analyzed clinical associations with patient outcomes, 363 were nominally significant of which 29 remained significant after stringent Bonferroni correction.

Bipolar disorder (BIP), neuroticism (NEU), and chronotype (CHT) all showed nominally significant enrichment in the anterior caudate annotation track.

Associations for several other autoimmune conditions that were nominally significant did not remain so after correction and should be interpreted as hypothesis-generating.

Multiple studies have identified nominally significant allelic associations with NTDs.

We used 1000 iterations and p ≤ 0.05 was viewed as nominally significant.

Results Derivation of Genetic Risk Scores Of the 6 well-studied variants, the associations with IS were nominally significant regarding 4 variants (rs6843082 [ PITX2 ]; rs2383207 [ CDKN2B - CDKN2A ]; rs2107595 [ HDAC9 ]; and rs879324 [ ZFHX3 ]) in our derivation samples (Tables I and II in the online-only Data Supplement ).

Results We found that DPP10 was significantly associated with bronchial hyperresponsiveness (BHR) and BHR asthma after the adjustment for multiple testing; while the associations of PHF11 with positive skin reactions to antigens and the associations of HLA-G with BHR asthma were only nominally significant.

Nevertheless, we observed nominally significant changes in DBP and SBP from week 0 to the LAV.

Compliance differences between different patient groups (eg, prophylaxis versus on-demand, polytherapy versus non-polytherapy, family status, personal life circumstances, etc.) will be assessed using inference statistical analysis (Mann–Whitney U -test or Kruskall–Wallis test for categorical determinants; P -values <0.05 will be regarded as nominally significant in double-sided tests).

Improvement in itch and hives was rapid, as demonstrated by the nominally significant and clinically meaningful change in UAS7 from baseline observed at week 4 compared with placebo (LS mean difference, −6.60 [95% CI, −11.22 to −1.97]).

We can show for multiple sclerosis, major depressive disorder, and body height, that the SNPs identified by DeepWAS are at least nominally significant in classical univariate GWAS analysis of the same cohorts or larger published GWAS.

Meta‐analysis of UKB and AoU AD‐by‐proxy cases yielded two new rare loci (RPL23/LASP1 and CEBPA/ AC008738.6 ), also nominally significant in NIAGADS.

Two gene-sets were created for each of the CN and VS results, one for genes implicated by epigenome-wide significant CpG-sites, and one for genes implicated by nominally significant CpG-sites, giving a total of four gene-sets.

In the results of forward MR, 150 WMTs-psychiatric disorders pairs were nominally significant ( P raw < 0.05).

A two-tailed p -value of < 0.05 was considered nominally significant.

Although spatial synchrony in cumulative precipitation was nominally significant between August and September 2018 at the 2 to 3 month timescale, the wavelet linear model test was not significant for 2 to 3 month timescales.