Barely Significant
← all phrases

“nominally significant”

7,733 sentences · 7,733 papers · 10,034 search hits before verification · confirmed specimen

Sighted at

p=0.08

Listed by Hankins (2013) · Otte et al. (2022)

In the literature

To assess whether the two nominally significant IUGR-group correlations were independent of baseline confounders, exploratory multivariable linear regression models were fitted within the IUGR group with birth weight percentile as the dependent variable and SHBG as the predictor of interest, and with AC percentile as the dependent variable and total testosterone as the predictor of interest; both models were adjusted for maternal age, systolic blood pressure, and sampling time.
But on the level of the cis -effects on the expression of the gene mRNA, the intronic non-coding editing events have less nominally significant effects compared to those events located in the 5′UTR, exons and 3′UTR (Fig. 4a–c , right) where the general patterns of the effect directions were positive rather than negative, indicating that the presence of the non-coding RNA editing events at 5′UTR, exons and 3′UTR were more likely to increase the mRNA expression of the genes.
As detailed in the Methods section, some preselection of genes is done, but the selection does not require even nominally significant association with a survival endpoint, as is often required in survival studies with high-dimensional covariates. 4 , 7 , 34 This allows for the identification of many important genes, some previously known to be involved in cancers other than ovarian, which would not otherwise have been considered.
In a small pilot dataset with sparse repeated measurements and no correction for multiple testing, isolated nominally significant p -values following a non-significant global interaction test are highly vulnerable to random variation and carry no inferential weight.
In addition, the revised early (<48 h) versus late (≥48 h) subgroup analysis involved multiple unadjusted comparisons across several parameters; therefore, the nominally significant findings observed for selected variables should be interpreted cautiously and considered hypothesis-generating.
8 Prespecified secondary end point results showed a nominally significant 62% decrease in COVID-19–related medical visits per day across all patients, relative to placebo in a subgroup analysis. 9 However, questions still remain about the clinical relevance of these results for the treatment of contemporary patients in the real-world setting, given that the EPIC-HR trial was conducted in unvaccinated adults without a history of prior infection during a period when the Delta variant was the predominant one.