Barely Significant
← all phrases

“nominally significant”

7,733 sentences · 7,733 papers · 10,034 search hits before verification · confirmed specimen

Sighted at

p=0.08

Listed by Hankins (2013) · Otte et al. (2022)

In the literature

nominally significantP = 0.0040.1× alphagold
Impact of pridopidine on global clinical progression (cUHDRS) In the mITT population off ADMs, pridopidine showed nominally significant benefits in maintaining cUHDRS scores compared with placebo, with the largest differences (Δ) at week 26 (Δ = 0.46, P = 0.004; placebo n = 112, pridopidine n = 95), week 39 (Δ = 0.45, P = 0.014; placebo n = 107, pridopidine n = 90) and week 52 (Δ = 0.41, P = 0.035; placebo n = 104, pridopidine n = 91) (Fig. 3a ).
nominally significantp = 0.0040.1× alphagold
LBC1921 Childhood cognitive ability in LBC1921 There was a nominally significant association between three SNPs and age 11 Moray House Test (MHT) score: CTSZ , rs9760 (F = 5.625, p = 0.004, η 2 = 0.025); GSTZ1 , rs3177429 (F = 4.820, p = 0.009, η 2 = 0.022); NDUFS4 rs31304 (F = 9.757, p = 0.002, η 2 = 0.022).
nominally significantP = 0.0040.1× alphagold
Among which tryptophan betaine was the most significant causal metabolite in both AF GWAS data (from Nielsen et al.) (odds ratio (OR) = 0.83, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.76–0.90, P = 9.37 × 10 −6 ) and AF GWAS data (from Roselli et al.) (OR = 0.82, 95% CI = 0.76–0.88, P = 2.00 × 10 −7 ), while uridine was nominally significant metabolites in both AF GWAS data (from Nielsen et al.) (OR = 0.58, 95% CI = 0.40–0.84, P = 0.004) and AF GWAS data (from Roselli et al.) (OR = 0.56, 95% CI = 0.35–0.88, P = 0.01).
nominally significantp = 0.00440.1× alphagold
After normalizing for the difference in sequence context between the datatypes, we found a difference in the proportion of a 5′ CCG 3′ → 5′CTG 3′ mutational signature that was nominally significant in our South Asian ancestry study compared to those from the European studies (ratio 1.35, p = 0.0044) (Fig. 3b ).
nominally significantP = 0.00480.1× alphagold
Although the GO annotation term includes both positive and negative regulators of Wnt signaling, the pathway “negative regulation of canonical Wnt signaling” is also nominally significant for the biased downregulation of freshwater alleles (7/7 genes, Fisher's exact test, P = 0.0048), suggestive of the biased Wnt inhibition in marine fish ( figs. 3 D and E ).
nominally significantP = 0.00500.1× alphagold
In the Results, in the “Part B cohort with infantile-onset SMA: neurodegeneration” section, the text “...compared with the ENDEAR matched sham group (30% reduction)” has been corrected to “...compared with the ENDEAR matched sham group (32% reduction)”, and “nominally significant P = 0.0050” has been corrected to “nominally significant P = 0.0075”.