Barely Significant
← all phrases

“nominally significant”

7,733 sentences · 7,733 papers · 10,034 search hits before verification · confirmed specimen

Sighted at

p=0.08

Listed by Hankins (2013) · Otte et al. (2022)

In the literature

nominally significantp = 3.00 × 10 −30.1× alphagold
When examining the genetic overlap between thyroid hormones and sex hormones, we observed suggestive, nominally significant positive genetic correlations between testosterone and both FT3 ( p = 3.00 × 10 −3 ) and FT4 ( p = 7.90 × 10 −3 ), as well as a Bonferroni-significant positive genetic correlation between FT4 and SHBG ( p = 2.00 × 10 −4 ); we additionally observed a suggestive negative genetic correlation between testosterone and TSH ( p = 4.50 × 10 −3 ). 3.3.
nominally significantp = 0.0030.1× alphagold
Although the results did not survive Bonferroni correction, nominally significant enrichments were observed for platelet sensitization by low-density lipoprotein cholesterol ( p = 0.003), IL-7 signaling ( p = 0.004), glycerophospholipid biosynthesis ( p = 0.005), and viral messenger RNA synthesis ( p = 0.011) ( Figure 2 and Supplementary Table 5 ).
nominally significantP =0.0030.1× alphagold
11 , 12 Other investigators have determined that the −521 C>T and 120 bp tandem repeat (TR) polymorphisms in DRD4 are associated with nominally significant summary odds ratios (ORs) as risk factors for schizophrenia ( P =0.003 and 0.005, respectively). 11 However, despite a great deal of research, an association between DRD4 polymorphisms and schizophrenia risk remains debatable.
nominally significantp = 0.0030.1× alphagold
borderline significantp = 0.0611.2× alphagold
S1 ) and even succeeded in replicating the nominally significant difference between NG and IFG groups in has-let-7a levels (p = 0.003, FC = 0.97) and the borderline significant result in hsa-miR-144-5p levels (p = 0.061, FC = 0.91) in the same setting.
nominally significantp = 0.0030.1× alphagold
Nominally significant adverse associations were observed in eight strata on unadjusted testing: an age below the cohort median of 72 years (HR 2.08, 95% CI 1.28–3.38; p = 0.003), an age of 72 years or older (HR 1.98, 95% CI 1.33–2.96; p < 0.001), female sex (HR 2.21, 95% CI 1.18–4.16; p = 0.013), male sex (HR 1.91, 95%
nominally significantp =0.00340.1× alphagold
Abdominal subcutaneous adipocyte area was nominally significant among different NAFL groups ( p =0.0034), with post-hoc analyses indicating a significant increase between NAFL 0 and NAFL 2 ( p =0.005) and trending increases between NAFL 0 and NAFL 1 ( p =0.052) and NAFL 1 and NAFL 2 ( p =0.054) ( Figure 2A ).
nominally significantp = 3.4 × 10 –30.1× alphagold
Nominally significant methylation differences were observed (i) between carriers vs. non-carriers at cg11481443 (standardized regression coefficient = −0.306, p = 3.4 × 10 –3 ; Additional file 6 : beta-value and M value plots) and cg02936398 (standardized regression coefficient = 0.177, p = 4.9 × 10 –2 ; Additional file 6 : beta-value and M value plots); (ii) hATTR patients and asymptomatic carriers at cg14311811 (standardized regression coefficient = −0.273, p = 3.8 × 10 –2 ; Additional file 6 : beta-value and M value plots).
nominally significantp = 0.00350.1× alphagold
Relationship Between the Sub-Dimensions of the SCOOHPI Scale and Demographic and Clinical Variables According to the study of the relationship between the three dimensions of the SCOOHPI scale and the sociodemographic and clinical variables, we find that only the third dimension (Activity and Organization) showed a nominally significant association with the DMFT index before correction for multiple comparisons ( p = 0.0035).
nominally significantP = .00350.1× alphagold
2B , none of the PCM genes reached the genome-wide significance level, though nine genes had nominally significant P -values: DNM1 (MAGMA P = .0035), RERE ( P = .015), FOXP1 ( P = .018), NCL ( P = .019), CUL3 ( P = .024), NASP ( P = .027), KCNMA1 ( P = .03), SETD2 ( P = .044), and MBD5 ( P = .048).
nominally significantP = 0.00350.1× alphagold
Results In the China subgroup ( n = 432; 22.7% of the KRONOS population), BGF MDI demonstrated nominally significant improvements in the primary endpoint versus BFF MDI (least squares mean (LSM) difference 68 mL; P = 0.0035) and BUD/FORM DPI (LSM difference 78 mL; P = 0.0010) but not GFF MDI (LSM difference − 4 mL; P = 0.8316).
nominally significantP = 3.7 × 10 −30.1× alphagold
We detected nominally significant enrichment for islet eQTLs for variants associated with continuous glycemic traits (normalized enrichment score (NES) = 1.27; P = 3.7 × 10 −3 ; Supplementary Fig. 9 and Supplementary Data 14 ): of all the tissues considered, islets generated the most significant enrichment for this phenotype.
nominally significantp = 0.0040.1× alphagold
LBC1921 Childhood cognitive ability in LBC1921 There was a nominally significant association between three SNPs and age 11 Moray House Test (MHT) score: CTSZ , rs9760 (F = 5.625, p = 0.004, η 2 = 0.025); GSTZ1 , rs3177429 (F = 4.820, p = 0.009, η 2 = 0.022); NDUFS4 rs31304 (F = 9.757, p = 0.002, η 2 = 0.022).