Barely Significant
← all phrases

“nominally significant”

7,733 sentences · 7,733 papers · 10,034 search hits before verification · confirmed specimen

Sighted at

p=0.08

Listed by Hankins (2013) · Otte et al. (2022)

In the literature

As evidenced by the eigenvector time series of PC1, the neural ensemble encoded a delay-discounted reward value (pointing toward –18°) in a stable manner for approximately 2 s after the presentation of the instruction cue and then rotated progressively toward a nominally significant pattern (pointing toward 44°) in which activity increased with longer delays to reward.
Indeed, fewer than half of the 32 SNPs in our panel are represented on any one high‐density SNP chip currently commercially available, although direct genotyping of a larger number of SNPs showing nominally significant association will be possible with the PsychChip (Illumina, San Diego, CA).
A nominally significant non‐linear association was observed only for the aMED score, with a greater rate of risk reduction beginning around a score of 3.5 ( p non‐linearity = 0.04; Figure S1 in supporting information); each one‐unit increase in the aMED and MIND scores was associated with a 5% and 3% lower risk of dementia in linear trend analyses, respectively.
This is consistent with results from the study of the sex-specific genetic architecture of high-level human complex traits [ 26 ], but is in contrast to the observation of a negative relationship in a review of other multiple species, which found that traits with large mean phenotypic differences across the sexes had small or negative genetic correlations [ 16 ]. To test if there was common functionality in the 100 probes with the most nominally significant deviation from r G =1, we performed a gene ontology (GO) analysis using the DAVID functional annotation tool.
In the following sections, we discuss the biological relevance of these three metabolite networks (ME7, ME8, and ME11) that were FDR significant and also associated with MetS z-score in boys as primary findings, followed by a discussion of secondary findings comprising other results that were nominally significant at alpha = 0.05. 3.2.