“nearly significant”

In 19 (61.3%) of these patients, the FGFR4 p.Gly388Arg variant was identified ( p =0.07 is nearly significant).

At T a s around the TNZ, T b rmr tended to be higher in the A than in the C lines (at 25°C: 0.38°C difference, at 28°C: 0.23°C, at 31°C: 0.25°C), but the difference was nearly significant only at 25°C ( p = 0.07; otherwise p > 0.44; Table 1 , Figure 2A ).

This effect was already nearly significant at 1 year after MMI withdrawal ( p = 0.07), and further increased up to 4 years, when it reached a plateau with a >42% decrease in the relapse rate relative to patients not treated with MPDS ( p = 0.01) ( Figure 2 ).

However, a nearly significant decrease in the levels of d1-specific IgA among the asthmatic children was determined (1.25 ± 0.19 kU/l as compared to 1.48 ± 0.43 kU/l in the control group; p = 0.07).

Looking at personal factors, first, we found that children aged 12–16 years were more likely to have behavioral problems, and the overall age differences in the adjusted logistic regression analysis were nearly significant ( P = 0.070).

In addition, lnAA changes in Study 2 had a nearly significant association (B = .014, t(7.69) = 2.16, p = .07), with slightly increased AA at lower rank.

There were no significant differences in the subject characteristics (as outlined in Methods), though age was nearly significant ( p = 0.07).

One tSNP, rs11604461 , was nearly significant (p=0.07, Table 1 ), but the permutation test (Ppermutation=0.6041, Table 1 ) showed it was not a true association.

The correlation with gender was nearly significant ( p = .07; Figure S1 ).

The general model of objective pain ( Table 6 ) found a nearly significant relation with state anxiety ( P =0.07).

During Period 1 (Figure 5 A), this method didn’t establish any significant cluster, but a nearly significant low-risk spatial cluster included the south-east part of the town on both sides of the Yamé River (SIR = 0.091; P -value = 0.07).

Leaf Number, a measure of developmental rate, has a nearly significant correlation with NDVI in each treatment (p<0.07) and is significantly correlated with NDVI if only S. arcanum and S. habrochaites accessions are considered ( Table 1 ).

crepitans was there a nearly significant difference in favor of GM (P = 0.07), while for the other species, there was no significant difference between the termination techniques ( Figure 2 ; Table 2 ).

Of note, the difference in regurgitant fraction between SG and VG was nearly significant in this study ( P =0.07).

For early lesions in cancer stages I and II, there is a significant increase in the LEBS marker; whereas for cancer stages III and IV, there is a nearly significant increase ( P = 0.07).

The main effect of run was significant for the left insula, F(3,138)=11.40, p<0.001, right insula F(3,138)=3.19, p<0.05 and visual association cortex, F(3,138)=15.43, p<0.001, and nearly significant in the left amygdala, F(3,138)=2.66, p=0.07.

Interestingly, in the subgroup of ADK patients, QoL scores tended to improve (from 58.3 to 66.7), with a nearly significant trend ( p = 0.07, Figure 3 ).

Note that, for ER– tumours SA/V was lower in treated tumours than in untreated tumours and this was nearly significant ( P= 0.07).

No significant differences among the groups at any of the sample types and any of the study visits were observed, although a nearly significant p -value ( p = 0.07, F = 1.28) was obtained among the three groups of saliva samples, collected at V4 ( Supplementary Figure 2 ).

With respect to tumor burden growth rate, no effect of DFMO was found, but there was a nearly significant ( P = 0.07) effect of sulindac.

Following this, a study from China reported increased birthweight among newborns of mothers with ID (nearly significant [ p = 0.07] n = 726) [ 15 ].

Articulation The post-hoc Bonferroni test showed nearly significant differences in articulation between correlation means for (R affective 1/2) and (R cognitive 1/R affective 1) at p = 0.07, but did not indicate significant differences either between (R cognitive 1/2) and (R cognitive 1/R affective 1) or between (R cognitive 1/2) and (R affective 1/2).

These differences were statistically significant in the aorta [median (IQR): 742 (322–1337) vs 365 (39–1144), p = 0.05], iliac arteries [median (IQR): 633 (242–1148) vs 337 (66–764), p = 0.02] and the total arterial calcification mass score [median (IQR): 1694 (812–3584) vs 1182 (235–2445), p = 0.03] and was nearly significant in the calcification mass score of the legs [median (IQR): 309 (93–851) vs 90 (11–627), p = 0.07].

The intervention factor had a nearly significant impact on F wave amplitude (F (2, 18) = 3.10, p = 0.07).

The only exceptions were SNAC1 and PR1#74 , which showed significant or nearly significant impacts of time, treatment, and their interaction ( SNAC1 , ANOVA: time, P = 0.07, Cohen’s f = 0.471; treatment, P = 0.05, Cohen’s f = 0.76; time x treatment, P = 0.07, Cohen’s f = 0.72; PR1#74 , ANOVA: time × treatment, P = 0.07, Cohen’s f = 0.73).