Barely Significant
← all phrases

“nearly significant”

3,288 sentences · 3,288 papers · 3,853 search hits before verification · confirmed specimen

Sighted at

p=0.0579p=0.06

Listed by Hankins, posted since · Hankins (2013) · Otte et al. (2022)

In the literature

nearly significantP < 0.071.4× alphagold
The CD14+ TNF-α+ population was significantly increased ( P < 0.04) when patients received the vaccine; IL-2 expression in both NK cells and in B lymphocytes was increased after a transient initial increase showed a nearly significant decrease ( P < 0.07 and P < 0.06 respectively), whereas the CD19+ and CD56+ populations did not show significant changes.
nearly significantP =0.071.4× alphagold
In addition, the result of multivariate analysis (Appendix 3, Supplemental Digital Content 3, http://links.lww.com/JS9/C702 ) showed that laparoscopy was inferior to open surgery, and the effects were nearly significant (HR: 1.53, 95% CI: 0.97–2.39, and P =0.07 for the OS; HR: 1.45, 95% CI: 0.98–2.15, and P =0.06 for the DFS).
nearly significantp = 0.071.4× alphagold
None of the call properties measured were significantly correlated with wet bulb temperature except for first pulse period ( r = − 0.53, P = 0.02), although correlations with call rise time and pulses per call were nearly significant ( p = 0.07; p = 0.06, respectively).
nearly significantp = 0.071.4× alphagold
In the comparison of the histogram and texture parameters between HPV-positive and HPV-negative patients, the lower contrast (66.6 ± 14.5) and higher homogeneity (2.34 ± 0.23 × 10 − 1 ) in HPV-positive cases compared to -negative cases (contrast: 76.8 ± 7.8, homogeneity: 2.17 ± 0.13) were revealed as nearly significant ( p = 0.07, 0.09 respectively).
nearly significantp = .071.4× alphagold
Pairwise comparisons indicate a significant difference between treatments in Willow Warblers (two‐sample t ‐test, t 24 = −6.08, p < .001) and nearly significant in Lesser Whitethroats (t 8 = −2.05, p = .07), but not significant in the other species (Common Chiffchaff: t 8 = −0.84, p = 0.42; European Robin: t 14 = −1.37, p = .19; Blue Tit: t 10 = −0.71, p = .49). 4.
nearly significantp = 0.071.4× alphagold
Caudal vibration Overall tail movement of larvae was not significantly affected by risk treatment (two-way repeated-measures ANOVA, F 1,58 = 1.41, p = 0.24), but the presence of a conspecific during the trials had a nearly significant effect on overall tail movement ( F 1,58 = 3.39, p = 0.07), which tended to be higher in individual trials (mean ± SE = 59.5 ± 4.2%) than in trials with a conspecific (53.6 ± 3.4%).