“near significance”

We found that observation interval was a highly significant factor ( p < 10 −10 ), whereas the effect of the ensemble size was near significance ( p = 0.0758) because of the difference in RMSD error area between k = 5 ensemble member trials and other ensemble sizes.

The SNP rs9632837 was near significance in our SIgAD meta-analysis (p = 7.9e-8) and became significant in the cFDR analysis.

Near significance of ss715615031, the significant marker for IRW, on Chr 13 ( P -value = 4.83 × 10 −6 ) and near significance of ss715585728, one of the significant markers for IRRS, on Chr 3 ( P -value = 1.11 × 10 −5 ) were observed for IPH.

The main correlations with stimulation— d’ average score and d’ approach for low BAS and’ d’ average for low BIS—remain significant and is near significance for approach d’ in low BIS participants when Bonferroni correction is applied (p = 0.0041).

Further comparisons between the groups indicated that the difference in the malformation rate between the young and old groups stored for the short time was near significance (10.5% vs.19.5%, respectively, P = 0.1093), whereas the difference between the young and old groups following long storage was highly significant (13.7% vs. 33.9%, respectively, p= 0.0075).

Significant changes were noted for the HAM-A total score ( t =4.59; P <.01) and the psychic subscale ( t =5.00; P <.01), as well as near significance (given the Bonferroni correction) of the somatic subscale ( t =3.25; P <.01).

While the nirK/nirS (distinct types of nitrite reductase) ( Fig 6 ) and norB family (nitric oxide reductase) ( Fig 7 ) had lower richness, their phylotype profile variability was significantly higher than for narG (Levene test p-values = 0.00003, 0.0001, respectively), and were near significance for nosZ (Levene test p-values = 0.0113, 0.0609 for nosZ I and nosZ II).

The correlation between the HFA values and the 60′ VEP IT values was near significance ( p = 0.0129), and this can suggest that the neural conduction along the large axons might also contribute to the reduced HFA MD. 4.2.

The decrease in cramming (from 15 down to five students) and underlining and highlighting (from 22 students to 10) were also near significance ( p = 0.016 and p = 0.014, respectively).

Similarly, IL-1β levels correlated positively with keratometry indices, with values between r = 0.307 (K1, near significance) and r = 0.345 (Kmax, p = 0.027).

SP concentration increased by near significance by one week within the Dextrose-1st group ( p = 0.028), and the between-group difference also approached significance ( p = 0.07).

However, the relationship between MoCA scores with Maze 2 ITI (R 2 = 0.142, p = 0.064) were near significance and with Maze 3 ITI (R 2 = 0.176, p = 0.037) were significant based on unadjusted results (Supplementary Table S4 ).

Prediction of decline in attention by variability was near significance (increased step length variability [ β = 1639.29, p =·04]) but decline in executive function was not predicted by any gait characteristic.

Also near significance in emotional control ( Z = −1.98 p = 0.04) and shifting ( Z = −2.26 p = 0.02).

Furthermore, P values near significance (eg, P = .048 and P = .036) may indicate model instability rather than genuine impacts.

The variables that showed either significance ( p ≤ 0.05) or near significance (0.1 ≥ p > 0.05) obtained from the univariate chi-squared analysis were ascertained to be included in the logistic regression analysis.

The environmental variables NDWI and NDVI were also included in the multivariate regression given their near significance ( p = 0.05).

Negative first impression of breastfeeding does near significance at the p <0.05 level.

Binary logistic regression analysis was carried out to ascertain predictors of low resilience, with significance levels set at p ≤ 0.05 or near significance (0.1 > p > 0.05).

Family communication satisfaction regarding the illness showed a trend toward near significance (p>0.05), with HD patients being more satisfied (mean=2.1, SD=1.2).

Overall, 14 predictors that showed significant association or a trend towards significant association ( p ≤ 0.05) or near significance (0.1 ≥ p > 0.05) with low resilience on the Chi-Square/ Fisher’s exact test were included in a binary logistic regression model.

On the left shoulder, Bonferroni corrections revealed significant increases from PRE to POST ( p < 0.001) and MID to POST ( p < 0.001), while near significance was found from PRE to MID ( p = 0.05).

Variables that showed either significance ( p ≤ 0.05) or near significance (0.1 ≥ p > 0.05) obtained from the univariate Chi-squared analysis were included in the regression model.

The variables that showed either significance ( p ≤ .05) or near significance (0.1 ≥ p > 0.05) obtained from the univariate Chi-squared analysis were included in the respective regression model.

NCKX4 was also upregulated in Stim1 cKO mice with an adjusted p -value that is near significance (adj. p < 0.05) when compared to both Stim1 HT and Stim1 Ctrl.