Barely Significant
← all phrases

“narrowly missed statistical significance”

228 sentences · 228 papers · 276 search hits before verification

In the literature

For example, although the difference in PPD reduction between groups narrowly missed statistical significance ( p = 0.052), the mean reduction was 94.5% greater in the test group compared to the control group (−3.21 mm vs. −1.65 mm), representing a clinically relevant effect that might have reached significance with a larger sample size.
In terms of conscious balance processing, results indicated a trend toward a more automatic method of balance control during virtual height exposure in children as compared to adolescents and young adults, although the effect of age narrowly missed statistical significance ( p = 0.053, η p 2 = 0.10).
The baseline systolic BP subgroup interaction narrowly missed statistical significance ( p = 0.053), with a suggestion that treatment with GTN in participants with increasing systolic BP may be associated with tendencies toward improved functional outcome at 90 days.
Separation of the cell lines as K‐Ras mutant/amplified versus WT demonstrated increased sensitivity of the WT lines at all three concentrations of everolimus examined, although the 5 n m group narrowly missed statistical significance ( P = 0.053) (Fig. 2 D). 3.4 Activation of the PI3K/PTEN/AKT pathway and everolimus response We next determined whether the activation status of the PI3K/PTEN/AKT pathway was predictive of everolimus response.
From a clinical perspective, higher levels of integrated regulation were associated with approximately 687 additional daily steps and 111 additional minutes of total physical activity; however, the association narrowly missed statistical significance ( p = 0.054), whereas higher self‐determination was associated with approximately 13 fewer sedentary minutes per day.
Moreover, sCECT images demonstrated significantly higher SNR and CNR values than NCCT across the anatomical regions (AA, MPA, LN) for both reviewers ( p < 0.05), except for the LN CNR measured by reviewer 1, which narrowly missed statistical significance ( p = 0.054).
While HBeAg levels between the HBsAg Loss and HBsAg Persistent groups were comparable at 3 months, HBsAg levels in the Loss group were already lower than in the Persistent group, although the difference narrowly missed statistical significance ( p = 0.054).
Compared with TAU, subsequent Cox regression analysis showed that the probability for remission was significantly higher for ALGO DE (HR=1.67 [95%CI 1.11–2.52] Wald test=6.03, P =.014) and for ALGO SW (HR=1.64 [95%CI 1.10–2.48] Wald test=5.60, P =.018), but narrowly missed statistical significance for ALGO LA (HR=1.49 [95%CI 0.99–2.25] Wald test=3.69, P =.055), while there was no difference for time to remission between CDES and TAU (HR=1.06 [95% CI 0.68–1.63], Wald test=0.06, P =.811) (HR=1.06 [95% CI 0.68–1.63], Wald test=0.06, P =.811).
At univariate analysis at 12 months, lymphopenia responders had a lower rate of anti-Sm seropositive patients (17.1% vs 42.2%, p=0.011), higher mean C4 values (11.7±6.2 vs 8.8±4.5 mg/dL, p<0.05) and higher mean±SD baseline lymphocyte counts (0.768±0.195 vs 0.679±0.208 x 10 9 /L, p<0.05) compared with lymphopenia non-responders; lower rates of anti-SSA seropositive patients were found among responders, although this difference narrowly missed statistical significance (45.7% vs 65.6%, p=0.055).