Barely Significant
← all phrases

“modestly significant”

258 sentences · 258 papers · 308 search hits before verification · confirmed specimen

Sighted at

p=0.09

Listed by Hankins (2013) · Otte et al. (2022)

In the literature

modestly significantP = 0.020.4× alphaqualifiedgold
In males too [ Table 8 ], the picture was more or less similar except that highest prevalence of hypercholesterolemia was seen in TH (12.5%) and not in the KO and the difference between the highest and the lowest levels (KA) was modestly significant statistically ( P = 0.02).
modestly significantP = 0.020.4× alphaqualifiedgold
Previously, the UGT1A7*3 allele exhibited modestly significant association with colorectal cancer (OR = 2.39; P = 0.02) [ 57 ], lung cancer [ 62 ], endometrial cancer [ 63 ] and pancreatic cancer (OR = 1.98; P = 0.003) [ 64 ] with a particularly strong association in smokers with pancreatic carcinoma who were younger than 55 years (OR = 4.7; P = 0.0009), suggesting the magnitude of the observed associations may be modified by environmental interactions.
modestly significantP = 0.027750.6× alphaqualifiedgold
We analyzed 307 PTB cases and 2,826 controls from the Latino population from the Genes-environments and Admixture in Latino Americans babies (GALA II) study 67 and found that variant rs17591250 on chromosome 1 was modestly significant (OR = 0.7, P = 0.02775;, however, we observed a flip in the odds ratio (OR) for this population.
modestly significantP = 0.030.6× alphaqualifiedgold
When the executive attention scores for subjects carrying the C1460T (T), LPR (3-repeat) haplotype were compared with executive attention scores for subjects carrying the C1460T (C), LPR (4-repeat) haplotype, modestly significant differences (P = 0.03) were observed.
modestly significantp = 0.0310.6× alphaqualifiedgold
Treatment worked better the more readily cells could replace their neighbors for all protocols ( p < 0.01 and HR ≤ 0.83), with only two exceptions: for DM Ping-Pong Alternate Every Cycle, there was no significant difference between 50% and 100% replacement ( p = 0.275), and for DM Ping-Pong on Progression, that difference was only modestly significant, though still with a large effect size (HR = 0.40 [0.17–0.92], p = 0.031).
modestly significantp = 0.03160.6× alphaqualifiedgold
Compared to infants diagnosed with NEC in the pre-probiotic epoch, infants with NEC in the post-probiotic epoch did have a modestly significant lower 5 min APGAR score (6.3 vs. 7.8; p = 0.0316) as well as an increased rate of probiotic use (65% vs. 0%; p < 0.0001).
modestly significantp = 0.03270.7× alphaqualifiedgold
Meta-analysis between global fractional anisotropy (gFA) and positive symptoms A random effects meta-analysis was conducted using the site-specific correlation coefficients for the association between gFA and positive symptoms ( n = 1025), which indicated a modestly significant negative association between gFA and positive symptoms across all 19 sites ( r = −0.0686 [−0.1303, −0.0063], p = 0.0327, df = 18).