Barely Significant
← all phrases

“markedly significant”

477 sentences · 477 papers · 726 search hits before verification

In the literature

markedly significantp < 0.010.2× alphaqualified
marginally significantp < 0.051.0× alphagold
Furthermore, when comparing body length, the significant differences in six pairs disappeared after preservation; a marginally significant difference ( p < 0.05) in one pair increased to a markedly significant difference ( p < 0.01); and differences in three pairs increased from being markedly significant to highly significant ( p < 0.001).
markedly significantP < 0.010.2× alphaqualified
The variation in shivering was markedly significant at 30, 45, and 60 min among group I and group III ( P < 0.01) [ Table 4 ], while at 5, 10, 15, and 90 min the variation in shivering was statistically insignificant ( P < 0.05).
markedly significantp < 0.010.2× alphaqualified
The mean average of the Apgar test increased slightly at each measurement in both protocols, and the difference between the Apgar 0 evaluation (7.0 ± 0.2 and 8.1 ± 0.2, CSP and CSA, respectively) and the Apgar 120 score (9.1 ± 0.2 and 9.7 ± 0.1, CSP and CSA, respectively) was markedly significant ( p < 0.01).
markedly significantp = 0.0170.3× alphaqualified
It’s worthy that the associations were more markedly significant in the participants of the higher TyG index (the Q4) with the oldest age (≥ 65 years) (HR 2.539, 95% CI 1.227–5.863, p = 0.017), higher eGFR (≥ 90 mL/(min·1.73 m 2 )) (HR 2.876, 95% CI 1.603–5.886, p = 0.020) or obesity (BMI ≥ 28 kg/m 2 ) (HR 2.767, 95% CI 1.023–6.778, p = 0.023).
markedly significantP = 0.030.6× alphaqualified
described previously [ 9 ], we divided the test items of the QMG score into 4 subgroups, where double vision on lateral gaze, ptosis, and facial muscle weakness belonged to the subgroup of “ocular symptoms.” The results suggested that there were markedly significant differences in female gender ( P = 0.03) between the two groups, whereas there were no differences in mean age, follow-up period, seropositivity of autoantibodies to the acetylcholine receptor, presence of thymoma, or history of treatments, including thymectomy and administration of prednisolone and calcineurin inhibitor ( Table 1 ).
markedly significantP = 0.0470.9× alphaqualified
Meta-analysis indicated four markedly significant negative associations of 2DL3 (OR = 0.591, 95% CI = 0.351–0.994; P = 0.047), 2DL5 (OR = 0.716, 95% CI = 0.601–0.853; P < 0.001), 2DS5 (OR = 0.623, 95% CI = 0.393–0.988; P = 0.045), and 3DL3 (OR = 0.324, 95% CI = 0.129–0.814; P = 0.016) with RA susceptibility (Fig. 2 ).
markedly significantP ≤ 0.051.0× alphaqualified
Effects of BV and/or BLM on Lactate Dehydrogenase (LDH) Release After 24 hr of incubation, BV-treated lymphocytes exhibited markedly significant elevations in LDH release (26.73 ± 1.67, P ≤ 0.05), while BLM treated replicates showed non-significant (13.55 ± 1.53) increases; however, at co-exposure to both BV and BLM, LDH release increased significantly (21.45 ± 1.65) in comparison to the control group (12.93 ± 0.97) ( Figure 2 ).