Barely Significant
← all phrases

“markedly significant”

477 sentences · 477 papers · 726 search hits before verification

In the literature

markedly significantP = 0.0030.1× alphaqualified
Fifteen patients (P = 0.02); for patients with intestinal involvement, only I only RT, one only surgery: stage and the presence of MHI were significant (P = 0.001 d CT either as initial treat- and 0.006 respectively). ment (eight CHOP, four RT + COP) or as salvage therapy (one COP), and 12 were receiving CT at time of death (five CHOP, one BEAM, one COP, 2RT + COP, one Chloram- bucil, two Mitoxantrone). Prognostic factors On univariate analysis the most markedly significant factors related to overall survival were stage (P = 0.003) and MALT status (P = 0.004), with localised stage and evidence of tumour origin from MALT being associated with relatively high survival.
markedly significantp = 0.0060.1× alphaqualified
1 – 3 ), the EEFBs removed almost 53.1% ± 1.13% of the TN with a concentration of up to 6.56 ± 0.20 mg L −1 , and the net removal rate of EEFBs and EFBs were 40.9% ± 1.13% and 14.5% ± 1.19%, which represent a markedly significant difference in the TN removal ( p = 0.006).
markedly significantp = 0.0080.2× alphaqualified
The effect of probucol therapy on long-term survival following complete revascularization was also reported in 1,694 patients after complete revascularization with PCI and/or CABG by a propensity score analysis 45 ) , in which the use of probucol was associated with a markedly significant decrease in all-cause death in a propensity score-adjusted model (hazard ratio = 0.57; p = 0.008).
markedly significantp = 0.0080.2× alphaqualified
Considering duration of “Floating” during the second session of afternoon, Time * Treatment interaction was markedly significant (F[1,16] = 9.1; p = 0.008): regardless of genotype, control groups carried out floating similarly in the first and the second half session (21.2 ± 17.93); instead treatment with Moringa increased duration of floating in the second period of test (47.3 ± 11.98).
markedly significantp < 0.010.2× alphaqualified
The heterozygous disruption strain (K7 k7pbs2Δ/K7PBS2 L545 ) exhibited a further significant decrease (6.78% ± 0.10%), and the homozygous disruption strain (K7 k7pbs2Δ/ k7pbs2Δ ) had an even more markedly significant decrease in ethanol concentration (3.43% ± 0.18%) ( p < 0.01, Tukey–Kramer honest significant difference, respectively) (Fig. 6 c).
markedly significantP < 0.010.2× alphaqualified
The variation in shivering was markedly significant at 30, 45, and 60 min among group I and group III ( P < 0.01) [ Table 4 ], while at 5, 10, 15, and 90 min the variation in shivering was statistically insignificant ( P < 0.05).