The Kruskal–Wallis test showed a marginally statistically significant difference between baseline (mean 3.8, 95% CI 3.5 to 4.0) and follow-up (3.4, 95% CI 3.1 to 3.6) for the SFS (χ 2 =3.9, p=0.047).
← all phrases
“marginally statistically significant”
Sighted at
p=0.08
In the literature
Removal of the 14 potential outliers resulted in a pooled SMD of 0.410 (95% CI 0.005–0.815) which was only marginally statistically significant ( t = 2.08, P = 0.047).
Specifically in the multivariate model (Table 6 ), in relation to the faculty of Geotechnical Sciences and Environmental Management, only the faculty of Engineering and Technology showed a marginally statistically significant effect in comparison with the other faculties (OR 1.80, 95% CI: 1.00 - 3.08, p = 0.047).
This difference is marginally statistically significant ( P = 0.0470).
Systolic and diastolic ADC showed similar differences between the two centres, at 0.05 and 0.07 × 10 -3 mm 2 /s, with only the diastolic ADC difference being marginally statistically significant (p = 0.047).
The random coefficient model in which both the intercept and the effect of the linear predictor were allowed to vary across hospitals (Model 4) was found to provide a marginally statistically significant improvement in fit compared to the prior model in which only the intercept varied across hospitals (likelihood ratio test: χ 2 = 6.08 ( df = 2), P = 0.0478).
On the other hand, there is a marginally statistically significant correlation between ease of performance and age (p = 0.048).
Similarly, we also note marginally statistically significant differences after PSM in DMFS ( P = 0.048), DFS ( P = 0.048), and OS ( P = 0.025) favoring the MA-NSM group.
Observed adherence to treatment differed from expected in all stages and groups, whereas the differences between groups were marginally statistically significant (p=0.048) only in the case of the 2011 guidelines (Group B differed from the others, exhibiting the lowest adherence percentage of −33%), while no differences between stages were observed in the case of the 2010 guidelines (p=0.0921).
In our predefined model, after adjusting for the same demographic covariates, a marginally statistically significant negative effect of AS on paroxetine Css was observed (exponentiated β = 0.90, 95% CI: 0.81–0.999, P = 0.048), which was not significant when further adjusting for daily dose.
The MK/S test was marginally statistically significant (p<0.048), but the results indicated that scores trended downwards only minimally (-0.002 slope coefficient).
This test produced one marginally statistically significant result, identifying a biological process that contained 4 of the 24 differentially expressed genes in our data set (Panther overrepresentation test, p = 0.048).
When comparing the proportions between urban (47%) and regional pharmacies, the higher proportion in the regional areas did appear to be marginally statistically significant (rate ratio 1.5; 95% CI 1.0 to 2.2; p=0.048).The majority of pharmacies (73%) typically had at least two pharmacists in the pharmacy at any specific time.
Univariable analyses indicated that former alcohol consumers experienced a marginally statistically significant increase in AAC risk (OR = 1.41, 95% CI: 1.00–1.99; p = 0.048).
NRI was marginally statistically significant for MACE in the same study (p = 0.048). 4 Discussion We identified 20 studies that cumulatively provide strong evidence on associations between myocardial perfusion abnormalities and adverse outcomes in patients with known or suspected CAD.
Pasture/hay land was not significantly associated with incidence in trivariate models, but demonstrated a marginally statistically significant negative association when included with total agricultural land (IRR, 0.918, P = .048).
Apart from geopolitical zone that was marginally statistically significant (p = 0∙0483) in the second wave, all the patients’ characteristics remained significantly associated with COVID-19 mortality in both waves in the adjusted model.
This was followed by an upward trend (APC = 4.7, 95% CI: 1.3 to 8.2) during the financial crisis, with a 57% increase by 2016, from 1.8 to 2.8 per 1,000 live births, and finally, a marginally statistically significant improvement from 2016 to 2022 (APC = −2.6, 95% CI: −5.1 to −0.0) (p = 0.049).
A comparison of LINE-1 methylation as a continuous variable yielded a marginally statistically significant association between decreasing LINE-1 methylation level and testicular cancer (OR per unit change = 1.15, 95% CI 1.00-1.32; P = 0.049).
S1 ), a decrease that, although small, was marginally statistically significant ( P = 0.049) ( Supplemental Table S3 ).
Difference between AST of D1 and D4 also showed a marginally statistically significant difference (p = 0.049).We analysed AST/ALT ratio D1 and D4 but it did not reach statistical significance (p = 0.711).
Corroborating evidence was provided by Wilcoxon test, which did not detect any statistically significant difference overall between the scores given by the 2 evaluators for the answers provided by the 4 LLMs ( Table 2 ), except for the scores given for the answers provided by ChatGPT-4, between which a marginally statistically significant difference was found ( P =.049).
However, a marginally statistically significant difference ( p = 0.049 ) was noticed when stage I patients compared to the aggregated stage II and III patients.
However, we acknowledge that the association of a lower FiO 2 requirements with barotrauma in our study was marginally statistically significant ( p = 0.049) and might represent a chance finding.
Local seed sources had a lower percentage of missing rings than the most distant seed sources, though this result was marginally statistically significant (Wilcoxon Test: p = 0.049).