“marginally statistically significant”

We note, however, that the higher levels of both CRIB and Pak1 on cell sides were marginally statistically significant after 30 min illumination ( p = 0.04; see Figure 5B,C).

However, all 10 gene-level associations had OR < 1 with lower mutation burden in controls compared to cases, which was marginally statistically significant in permutation testing (p = 0.04).

After propensity matching, baseline characteristics were comparable between the cohorts with the exception of a marginally statistically significant worse SF-36 PCS among patients with CS (31.5 ± 9.8 vs 34.5 ± 8.4, P = .04) ( Table 3 ).

After adjustment for covariates, a marginally statistically significant difference in Hgb A1c between highest and lowest SES quintile (p = 0.04) remained in the material deprivation model, but not in the other models.

An exception was a marginally statistically significant interaction ( P = .04) for the comparison of cephalosporin versus no antibiotic for the outcome of bacteremia when stratified by the risk of bacteremia in the control group.

15 However, this effect was only marginally statistically significant in unadjusted analyses ( P = .04), and most of the data were from trials in which sirolimus was used de novo and not following elective conversion as we did in our trial.

Measurements in liver tissue showed a marginally statistically significant difference between the control and stevia groups ( p = 0.04); however, restoration of the MDA measurements was up to 85% for the leaf-extract-treated diseased animals.

These results are consistent with an imbalance of expression of the two alleles, as expected for a leaky variant. Figure 5 shows that for the distribution of read-abundance-based intron inclusion is marginally statistically significant ( p = 0.04).

Allometric adjustment converted an association of vascular disease history with reduced NMD% from marginally nonsignificant ( P =0.07) to marginally statistically significant ( P =0.04) (Table S5).

Moreover, trials focused on high-risk MM patients demonstrated a marginally statistically significant ( p = 0.04) lower PFS rate (79% PFS%, 95% CI: 72–85%) than trials on standard MM populations (87% PFS%, 95% CI: 82–91%) ( Supplementary Table S1 ).

Intriguingly, no statistical difference was observed in term of the operation time, which does not agree with the previous study where they observed a marginally statistically significant difference ( P = 0.04) between the two groups ( 3 ).

In typical use analysis, copper IUD was associated with a marginally statistically significant higher risk of pregnancy compared to LNG implant (aHR 1.74, 95% CI 1.01–2.99, p = 0.04).

However, although number of siblings showed no overall association with physical activity, a formal test for interaction between number of siblings and ethnicity was marginally statistically significant (p = 0.04, p = 0.05 in the mutually adjusted model with all significant factors).

In patients from the Burkina Faso and Mozambique cohorts, the same trend was observed, but the correlation was weaker and marginally statistically significant in Burkina Faso ( r = -0.38, p = 0.040) and not statistically significant in Mozambique ( r = -0.24).

Of all the outcomes reported for step initiation only velocity-based outcomes in ML direction showed a small but marginally statistically significant effect favoring Levodopa ON state (SMD = –0.28 [–0.54; –0.02], Z = 2.09 [ p = 0.04], I 2 = 0% [ p = 0.93]).

None of the SNPs showed significant associations in cases with non-operable tumor stage, with the possible exception of 5q11.2-rs889312 which showed a marginally statistically significant association (adjusted P = 0.04).

Although the US trial results did not have sufficient follow-up to report on the primary outcome (long term survival without major disability), they showed a marginally statistically significant ( P < 0.04) higher level of mortality when lower levels of oxygen were targeted.

The difference between 10% and 20% DMSO was noted as marginally statistically significant ( p = 0.04).

In addition, the estimates of GP17 on T2D were marginally statistically significant in size in the weighted median method (OR = 0.671, 95% CI = 0.458–0.984, P = 0.041) but not in the IVW method and MR‒Egger method.

A marginally statistically significant association was found in older adults between higher proportions of sleep and higher resting heart rate ( p = 0.041).

Nevertheless, the change between the first and third time point was marginally statistically significant ( t = 2.06, df = 197, p = 0.041).

Among the narcolepsy-like symptoms collected from all subjects, we found a marginally statistically significant difference for the frequency of sleep attack, which was reported by 10 hPRL participants and five nPRL patients (chi-square 4.12, p = 0.042), while no statistically significant difference was found for the very few reports of cataplexy, hypnagogic/hypnopompic hallucinations, sleep paralysis, or automatic behaviors.

Among the general population, PW elicited more benefits (MD = 0.45, 95% CI: 0.18, 0.71, p = 0.001), whereas, for patients, there was just a marginally statistically significant difference between the two writing prompts (MD = 0.35, 95% CI: 0.01, 0.69, p = 0.042).

Comparison of the two subgroups with duration 0-6 months and 7-12 months in the intervention group, showed lower THI and Mini-TQ values after treatment in the 0-6 months subgroup, which were marginally statistically significant (THI: p = 0.042; Mini-TQ: p-0.029), implying probably a small beneficial effect of spontaneous remission.

PEth) was marginally statistically significant for men ( P = 0.042).