Barely Significant
← all phrases

“marginally statistically significant”

1,111 sentences · 1,111 papers · 1,322 search hits before verification · confirmed specimen

Sighted at

p=0.08

Listed by Hankins (2013) · Otte et al. (2022)

In the literature

With stratification by country, the correlation of VG score with ISS was only marginally statistically significant among isolates from the USA (rho = 0.37, p = 0.03) and was not significant among isolates from Spain (rho = 0.18, p = 0.23).
Among nonsmokers, male infants of 677CT genotype mothers were 90.00 g (95% CI: −2.11 to 182.50, P = 0.05) heavier than the infants in the reference category, which was marginally statistically significant, while among passive smokers, female infants of 677TT homozygous mothers were 99.00 g (95% CI: −190.26 to −7.56, P = 0.03) lighter than reference.
Pneumococcal Vaccination Among Hispanic and Non-Hispanic Colorectal Cancer Survivors The results from our adjusted multivariable model indicated 10% decreased odds of vaccination for Hispanic CRC survivors versus non-Hispanics, which is marginally statistically significant (adjusted odds ratio [AOR] 0.889, 95% CI 0.798 to 0.99; P =.033; Table 3 ).
marginally statistically significantp = 0.0370.7× alphagold
However, the prespecified sensitivity analysis, in which adhesions were classified in three clinically meaningful categories: no adhesions (grade 0), thin/mild adhesions (grades 1–2) and thick/severe adhesions (grades 3–4), revealed a marginally statistically significant difference between the groups (Pearson χ 2 = 9.578, df = 4, exact p = 0.037), allowing for a clearer comparative assessment ( Table 4 ) (Supplementary File S1) .
Measurements in liver tissue showed a marginally statistically significant difference between the control and stevia groups ( p = 0.04); however, restoration of the MDA measurements was up to 85% for the leaf-extract-treated diseased animals.
Three-factor RM-ANOVA (target size x target location x luminance type) for BSRs showed a marginally statistically significant main effect of only target location [F(4,240) = 3.94, p = 0.04, η p 2 = 0.01)], while target size [F(1,240) = 2.13, p = 0.07, η p 2 = 0.03)] and stimulus luminance [F(1,240) = 20, p = 0.77, η p 2 ≤0.01)] were not statistically significant ( Fig 6 ).