“marginally significant”

The severity of liver damage is associated with high risk for OSA and lower oxygen saturation In the entire cohort of 126 patients the prevalence of F2-F4 fibrosis was higher in patients at high risk compared to those without high risk for OSA (80.6% vs 57.8%, p = 0.006), this association remaining marginally significant after adjusting for confounders (O.R. 2.25, 95%C.I. 0.97–5.22; p = 0.05) ( Table 2 ).

There was a marginally significant difference in T2 PTSD symptoms ( t [164] = 1.97, p = 0.05), with those participating at both times reporting lower symptom levels ( M = 32.64, SD = 16.93) compared to those who only participated at T2 ( M = 39.16, SD = 19.48).

Women who identified as non-Hispanic/Latina/Spanish had marginally significant higher odds (OR 1.47; 95% CI 1.00–2.13; p = 0.050) of sustaining treatment compared to Hispanic/Latina/Spanish women.

Interestingly, although there was no overall effect of targeted region on perspective-taking [ F (13.12) = 2.46, P = 0.14, d = 0.38], there was a marginally significant interaction of targeted region with condition [ F (168.63) = 4.01, P = 0.05, Figure 4 ].

However, the p-value for this association was marginally significant (p = 0.05). 3.6 Antibiogram results for gram-negative bacterial isolates The susceptibility profiles of different gram-negative bacterial strains were analyzed, and the numbers and percentages of sensitive isolates are reported in Table 4 below.

In this analysis of advanced echocardiographic variables, only GWE exhibited a marginally significant difference between the two groups of heart transplant recipients ( p = 0.05), being higher in the OHT < 4 group compared to those with OHT ≥ 4.

The ROS levels in U87 cells treated with the four nanoparticles were slightly higher than in the control group, with NaTmF 4 @SiO 2 showing a marginally significant difference ( p < 0.05).

High D-Dimer level was a marginally significant indicator of mortality in the studied population ( p =0.05).

Additionally, a marginally significant association was found between the CNV and body diagonal length in HS ( p -value = 0.050).

Likewise, a small marginally significant increase in plasma carotenoids (0.14 μmol/L difference from baseline to 6 months, p = 0.05) indicated increasing fruit and vegetable intake ( Table 5 ).

Results also showed a marginally significant main effect of sex ( F (1,103) = 3.939, p = 0.050, partial eta squared = 0.037), with females’ rating (mean = 6.38, SD = 0.11) being higher than males’ (mean = 6.05, SD = 0.11), whereas the main effect of group was not significant ( p > 0.05).

There was a marginally significant difference between groups for CELF core language ( p = .050), with the CH group performing on average 14 points (i.e. ~ 1 SD) below controls on this measure (see also Supplementary Table 1 ).

For right hemisphere TD run 5, there was a significant Type of Processing effect in the first component, F (2,94) = 3.97, p = 0.02, MSE = 0.91, partial eta squared = 0.08, and a marginally significant Type of Processing effect in the sixth component F (2,94) = 3.13, p = 0.05, MSE = 0.54, partial eta squared = 0.06.

Analysis III based on a three level ordered outcome shows a marginally significant trend ( p = 0.05).

When they investigated the risk factors they found a statistically marginally significant increased risk (p = 0.05) of females having these glaucomas.

We refer to effects as “marginally significant” when results indicate p < 0.05 but BF 10 < 3.0 (i.e., when the effect is supported by null hypothesis testing but the Bayes Factor suggests evidentiary value below our prespecified threshold).

The association between processing speed decline and the increase in somatic symptoms remained statistically significant in the fully adjusted models, whereas the effect of baseline delayed recall scores on changes in depressed affect was marginally significant ( p = 0.05).

Whereas the simple main effect of the block was marginally significant in the phone-present condition, F (1.48, 41.42) = 3.53, p = 0.05, η 2 = 0.0498, there were no significant differences between the blocks.

In contrast, children with high compliance demonstrated greater autonomy and independence from their families than those with low (marginally significant) and delayed low compliance ( p < 0.05).

The results from the statistical analyses showed that although the correlation between tannin contents in the total solids and Stiasny values was marginally significant at p = 0.05, the Stiasny values were not able to be used to predict tannin contents for the treatment of leather [ 26 ]. 3.1.4.

A composite OR of minor event occurrence between P1 and P2 was marginally significant at 4.7 (95% CI, 1.01 – 21.7; p = 0.05).

There was a marginally significant difference in weight gain ( p = 0.05) between the CF‐35g (control) group and the MCL‐35g group (Weanimix with Moringa ), after controlling for baseline values and wealth index (Table 4 ).

On one hand, for intra-subject, statistical test on the performance of deep ConvNet over shallow ConvNet find the statistics Z = −1.923 which is marginally significant ( p = 0.05), where the negative Z shows the shallow ConvNet performs better than deep ConvNet.

This effect reached statistical significance for CIV ( p = 0.001) and was marginally significant for CI ( p = 0.05).

Competing risks and mortality The Fine and Gray sub distribution hazard model showed that revision surgery was associated with a 78% higher hazard of reoperation compared to ORIF, with the result being marginally significant (HR = 1.78, 95% CI: 1.00–3.15, p = 0.050).