“marginally significant”

In the cognitive reappraisal subscale, the ASMR self-reporters who have watched ASMR videos had marginally significant higher scores than non-ASMR subjects ( t (124) = 1.66, p = 0.05, Cohen’s d = 0.30), with the ASMR group scoring 4.53 (SD = 1.12) and the non-ASMR group scoring 4.20 (SD = 1.16).

Congruency was marginally significant on the P200 amplitude [ F (1, 15) = 4.56, p = 0.05, η p 2 = 0.233], where incongruent conditions showed an enhanced positivity (Figure 3A ).

Breaking the interaction down, there was a marginally significant effect for inhibition control ability in A-2 condition, χ 2 = 3.74, df = 1, p = 0.05, suggesting better inhibition control ability indicates faster response in the A-2 condition.

The difference remained significant in patients receiving twice‐daily TRT (Figure 1 B: 15.57 vs 9.23 months P = .003), while marginally significant in those receiving once‐daily TRT (Figure 1 C: 12.13 vs 8.53, P = .050).

Marginally significant interaction was found between total vitamin C and vitamin C supplementation ( p = 0.05). 3.2.

Meta-analysis of OER The pooled analysis of 4 studies (n = 235) showed a marginally significant benefit for acupuncture (OR = 2.18, 95% CI [0.99, 4.80]; I 2=0%; P = .05; Fig. 7 ).

Tajima's D-test was marginally significant for this gene (0.1 < P -value < 0.05).

Impact of TDT prolongation on finger movement parameters GEE analyses using age and hand side as covariates showed that TDT prolongation in PD patients had a marginally significant impact on UPDRS scores for finger movement (TDT, B = 36.039 × 10 −4 , Wald χ 2 = 5.564, corrected p = 0.050).

The mean K occ;30–60 values in the DD group were significantly greater in the caudate (ES = 0.83, corrected p = 0.048), but marginally significant in the putamen (ES—Cohen’s d coefficient = 1.07, corrected p = 0.05) relative to the control group.

A main effect of form of script was marginally significant (F (1,46) = 4.02, p≤.05, η p 2 = .08), and the estimated marginal means suggested that the pointed script (mean = 346.40, SE = 2.95) elicited delayed amplitudes in comparison to the unpointed script (mean = 342.56, SE = 2.88).

There was a marginally significant negative correlation between the number of mice caught in a field season and the average larval body burden of mice ( t = -2.09; df =1, 16; P = 0.05).

In contrast, a study conducted on breast cancer reported a marginally significant reduction ( p = 0.05) in FTO gene expression in the breast tissue of patients with the AA homozygous genotype [ 54 ].

Male gender remained significantly associated with readmissions ( P = 0.02) and marginally significant with complications ( P = 0.05) in the ERCP subgroup.

Regarding DED symptoms, a marginally significant trend in DEQ-5 scores was observed, in which patients with elevated TC (>200 mg/dl) and LDL levels (>130 mg/dl) reported more severe DED symptoms ( p < 0.05) ( Figure 1(c) ).

A marginally significant difference was also noted in the mothers’ nationality, with the majority of foreign mothers being in the low PB group (83.3%, Fisher's Exact Test, P = .05).

3 ). For the Low Autistic Traits group there was also a marginally significant Condition × SOA interaction, F (1, 33) = 4.13, p = . 050, ηρ 2 = .11, whilst the High Autistic Traits group did not show the same interaction, F (1, 31) = 1.35, p = . 255, ηρ 2 = . 04.

The results of Experiment 2 showed that the main effect of time unit magnitude was marginally significant, F (1, 25) = 4.09, p = .05, η p 2 = .14.

This model provided an acceptable fit to the data [χ 2 (146) = 326.42, p < 0.001, CFI = 0.90, RMSEA = 0.06, SRMR = 0.08] but there was a marginally significant difference in model fit between the two models [Δχ 2 (21) = 32.42, p = 0.05].

Regarding physical performance, lower-limb strength and the sit-and-reach test score increased significantly in the intervention group, whereas a significant decrease in grip strength and a marginally significant decrease in 6-minute walking distance ( P = 0.05) were observed in the control group; each of these changes was significantly different from the corresponding change in the other group.

When examining looking durations as dichotomous variables, we observed a significant effect of age on total looking, β = –.44, p = .03, and a marginally significant effect of age on maximum look duration, β = –.41, p = .05.

A multivariate analysis also suggested that prolonged examination times were marginally significant (p=0.05) in influencing the occurrence of complications, possibly owing to the increased invasiveness affecting the patients.

Boys (81.6) are found to have a higher median UIC than girls (73.1) and it is marginally significant (p = 0.05).

As before, a main effect of probability ( F 2.0,32.6 = 38.4, = .510, p < .001) and a lesion × probability interaction ( F 2.0,32.6 = 4.29, = .510, p = .022) were present; in addition, there was a marginally significant lesion × hunger × probability interaction ( F 4,64 = 2.51, p = .05).

Pairwise comparisons of species communities identified marginally significant differences only between MGA and UGA (p = 0.05) and DrP and MtP (p = 0.05).

Adding H L to the model in Table 1 (“Isolated Populations”) had a marginally significant ( p = 0.05) positive effect on R but only if the regression was weighted with population size ( Table S3 ).