“marginally significant”

The nomogram model was established using the N stage and the risk score since the risk score was highly significant ( p < 0.001) and the N stage was marginally significant ( p = 0.055) upon the multivariate Cox analysis.

Differences between samples were expressed as “not significant” ( P ≥ 0.05), marginally significant ( P < 0.05)*, significant ( P < 0.01)**, highly significant ( P < 0.001)***.

When focusing on only those studies that can effectively test such relationships, all included prospective cohort studies and RCTs in this review reported significant effects of marketing exposure on later alcohol-related endpoints, but the strength of such associations was mixed, with p values ranging from marginally significant (e.g., p = .038)to highly significant (e.g., p < .001).

5, p = 0.010)], negative perception toward DD [schizophrenia (β = 0.43, p < 0.001), ASD (β = 0.38, p < 0.001), and ADHD (β = 0.40, p < 0.001)], the perception of the child psychiatrist of parents as being in opposition to the diagnosis [(schizophrenia: β = 0.48, p < 0.001; ASD: β = 0.23, p = 0.038, marginally significant after Bonferroni correction; ADHD: β = 0.35, p < 0.001)], and the presence of siblings with one of the three diagnoses in the patient's family [(schizophrenia: β = 0.46, p < 0.001; ASD: β = 0.28, p = 0.019, marginally significant; ADHD: β = 0.28, p = 0.009)].

A main effect of session was also significant or marginally significant (cooling, Pz: F(4,72) = 5.4, p < 0.001, T3: F(4,72) = 2.9, p = 0.028, T4: F(4,72) = 5.0, p = 0.0013; heating, Pz: F(4,72) = 2.2, p = 0.076, T3: F(4,72) = 4.2, p = 0.0040, T4: F(4,72) = 7.1, p < 0.001).

The first model shows that predisposing characteristics accounted for a marginally significant amount of variance in the outcome (Nagelkerke pseudo- R 2 = 0.0161; P < 0.001), representing approximately 2% of the variance.

In infants, this effect is marginally significant (adults, F [1, 34] = 16.34, p = 0.001, η 2 = 0.32; infants, F [1, 20] = 3.21, p = 0.18, η 2 = 0.14).

The main effect of pulse rate was highly significant ( F (2,20) = 99.3, P < 0.001) and that of duration was marginally significant ( F (1,10) = 4.76, P = 0.054).

Indeed, the two additional tryptophan residues lead to a significant difference in amino acid composition between the two putative ND6 variants (Wilcoxon test, p = 0.0181), which, in turn, explain the marginally significant difference in hydrophobicity (Wilcoxon test, p = 0.0580) and the highly significant differences in physicochemical features estimated by the Grantham [ 86 ] chemical distance (Wilcoxon test, p < 0.001) and the Schneider and Wrede [ 87 ] physicochemical distance (Wilcoxon test, p < 0.001).

We also found marginally significant Fc AMG-SCo in the fear-neutral contrast [ x = −4, y = −28, z = −8, t (21) = 3.45, p = 0.001].

When gender, age, monthly income, and education level were included as covariates, an ANCOVA revealed that the activating effect on behavioral intention remained marginally significant ( F (1, 186) = 34.22, p < 0.001, η 2 p = 0.155).

Analogous treatments performed on the selected 8 extracts identified significant down-regulation of aflM (respectively: 57.5, 17.6, 19.8, 109.6, 18.9, 30.4, 3.7, 11.2 times (all p < 0.001)) and marginally significant down-regulation of aflR (respectively: 9.1, 2.6, 1.9, 6.6, 2.0, 8.6, 1.4, 2.6 times (all 0.01 < p < 0.001)).

Mixed effects model analysis showed that there were highly significant differences (p<0.001) between the 21–30 years group (youngest vaccinees) and the 31–40, 41–50, and 51–60 groups, as well as a marginally significant difference (p = 0.092) between the 21–30 and the 61–72 years group ( Table 7 ).

Whereas the groups UW, NW, and OW showed marginally significant effects around β 1y = 0.001, a substantially higher effect was present in the OB group ( β 1y = 0.003, 95% CI 0.001–0.004; p < 0.001).

The correlation analysis of SR and FR emotions showed that SR valence and FR valence had a positive correlation, with ρ (32) = 0.87, p < .001, and so did SR arousal and FR arousal, ρ (32) = 0.40, p = .025 (marginally significant); SR sadness and FR sadness ρ (32) = 0.55, p = .001; SR happiness and FR happiness, ρ (32) = 0.87, p < .001; and SR anger and FR anger, ρ (32) = 0.60, p < .001.

The significance of associations between variables were as follows: in the metabolism of carbohydrates and in the transcription and translation, highly significant in both ( p -value < 0.001); in the biosynthesis of amino acids, not significant ( p -value > 0.05); and in the metabolism of energy, marginally significant ( p -value slightly greater than 0.05).

Among food preparation, sushi preparation showed a highly significant positive effect (β = 0.5814, p < 0.001) compared to smoked salmon, while grilled preparation demonstrated a marginally significant preference (β = 0.0879, p = 0.070).

All the main effects and interactions were highly significant, p < 0.001, except for the age group x target congruency interaction, which was marginally significant, F (1, 45) = 3.46, MSE < 0.001, p = 0.069.

The difference in JND was highly significant after adaptation to fast translational motion (baseline vs 20 Hz translation: p < 0.001) and marginally significant after adaptation to fast circular motion (baseline vs 20 Hz circular: p = 0.06).

The interaction effects showed that all pairwise interactions between the factors were significant: the interaction between participant group and occlusion was significant F(2,118) = 3.910, p = 0.023,η 2 p = 0.062 ; the interaction between group and emotion was marginally significant F(2,118) = 2.923, p = 0.058,η 2 p = 0.047; and the interaction between occlusion and emotion was highly significant F(4,236) = 86.601, p < 0.001,η 2 p = 0.595.

There was significant main effect of perceptual load, F (1, 19) = 290.86, p < 0.001, η 2 p = 0.94, with faster RTs in the low load condition (631 ms) than in the high load condition (1207 ms); and, there was also a marginally significant main effect of singleton distractor presence, F (1, 19) = 17.72, p < 0.001, η 2 p = 0.48, with RTs in the neutral distractor condition (937 ms) being slower than RTs in the singleton distractor absent condition (901 ms).

However, using a Bonferroni correction and corresponding alpha of 0.001, lifetime history of major depressive disorder and persistent depressive disorder was the only disorders significantly correlated with misophonia severity, and the correlation with current OCD was marginally significant ( p = 0.001).

Differences among genotypes were highly significant for t 95 [ F (9,37)=4.05, P =0.0011] and for t 75 – t 25 [ F (9,36)=3.14, P =0.0068], and marginally significant for t 25 [ F (9,39)=2.22, P =0.041].

YOLOv6-L6 achieved the largest gain (9.8%, 95% CI: 7.0–12.9%), while Salience-DETR with FocalNet backbone showed marginally significant improvement (1.6%, 95% CI: −0.7% to 3.9%, paired t -test p > 0.0011, Wilcoxon signed-rank test p < 0.0011).

The difference in biosecurity spending was highly significant ( p = 0.0013), while the difference in infection reveals was marginally significant ( p = 0.0487).