“marginally significant”

Post hoc Scheffe test revealed only a marginally significant difference between African American (M=51.22) and White women (M=42.81, p =0.001).

For English musicians and non-musicians, the results revealed significant or marginally significant main effects of the following variables: vowel quality [χ 2 (1) = 43.46, p < 0.001], duration [χ 2 (1) = 6341.9, p < 0.001] and pitch direction [χ 2 (1) = 3.52, p = 0.06].

After controlling for season of draw, which is itself a marginally significant predictor of S-ECC status, increases in both 25(OH)D and calcium, as well as being breastfed as an infant ( p < 0.001), are significantly and independently associated with a lower likelihood of S-ECC ( p = 0.019 and p < 0.0001, respectively).

Moreover, the fraction of tumoral dendritic cells component was significantly (highly significant in dendritic cells resting (HR = 0.4 (0.23–0.69), p < 0.001) and marginally significant in dendritic cells activated (HR = 0.56 (0.30–1.04), p value = 0.067)) and positively associated with poor prognosis, suggesting a deleterious effect on clinical outcome, whereas a totally opposite beneficial effect was observed in peritumor samples (dendritic cells resting [HR = 1.97 (1.27–3.06), p value = 0.003]; dendritic cells activated [HR = 2.92 (1.07–7.98), p value = 0.037]) ( Figure 5 B).

All the main effects and interactions were highly significant, p < 0.001, except for the age group x target congruency interaction, which was marginally significant, F (1, 45) = 3.46, MSE < 0.001, p = 0.069.

One day after the transplant (i.e., day 1), variation in gut microbial community composition were mainly explained by the inoculum effect, while the recipient genotype only had a marginally significant effect ( p = 0.001 and 0.062, respectively; permutation MANOVA; Fig. 5b ).

The database provides the following information: (i) In addition to all the GVs annotated in the NHGRI GWAS Catalog, we manually curated the GVs that are marginally significant ( P < 1.0 × 10 −3 ) collected from supplementary materials of each original publication.

However, the predicted interaction between compensation and nation remained marginally significant, although the effect of compensation was slightly stronger among Americans, t (50) = 12.15, p < 0.001, d = 1.63, than among Japanese t (49) = 8.54, p < 0.001, d = 1.22.

Compared to the controls, our findings indicate a highly significant association between BRCA1 methylation and HGSOC ( p = 0.001 OR = 3.25, 95% CI = 1.58–6.68) ( Table 2 A), but only a marginally significant association between MGMT methylation and HGSOC ( p = 0.054, OR = 2.13, 95% CI = 0.98–4.62) ( Table 2 B). 2.6.

In line with these results, mosquitoes fed with dsCHIK1 did not show any significant reduction in viral titers after infection with CHIKV, whereas mosquitoes injected with dsCHIK1 showed reduced viral titers in whole bodies two days post-infection and marginally significant reduced titers five days post-infection ( Figures S5 A–S5C, Kruskal-Wallis test on log-transformed viral titers: day 2 p < 0.001; day 5 p = 0.04; Kruskal-Wallis test on prevalence: day 2 p = 0.18; day 5 p = 0.07; see Table S2 for individual comparisons).

Specifically for Northern Europe, there is a marginally significant ( P =0.06) warming despite a highly significant ( P <0.001) decrease in zonal wind ( Table 1 ), the latter implying a more easterly flow regime typically linked to colder winter temperatures.

Two-way mixed ANOVAs of time allocation showed in the IG group, a marginally significant main effect of activity ( F (3, 525) = 8.847, p < 0.001) and a highly significant interaction between activity and NAM ( F (3, 525) = 14.791, p < 0.001).

When focusing on only those studies that can effectively test such relationships, all included prospective cohort studies and RCTs in this review reported significant effects of marketing exposure on later alcohol-related endpoints, but the strength of such associations was mixed, with p values ranging from marginally significant (e.g., p = .038)to highly significant (e.g., p < .001).

However, the effects of the two antidepressants differed, in that IMI strongly decreased the immobility time, whereas FLX produced only a marginally significant decrease (IMI: 81.5 ± 24.7 sec, p < 0.001; FLX:190.2 ± 4.29 sec, p < 0.05 vs. toluene-treated group: 207.0 ±4.33 sec, n = 6) in contrast to the effects in TST ( Fig. 3 B) .

We observed highly significant overlap between the two sets of genes at 29°C (P = 3.58E-07) and marginally significant overlap at 21°C (P = 0.001), which is consistent with our SNP-based analysis.

We considered the following levels of significance for p -values: (1) highly significant ( p ≤ 0.001), (2) significant ( p < 0.05), (3) marginally significant or trend-level significant (0.05 ≤ p ≤ 0.07), and (4) not significant.

Discriminability index ( d′ ) : A one‐way repeated‐measures ANOVA with four levels (word type: BW, TW, HFDW, LFDW) revealed a marginally significant main effect of word type, F (3, 177) = 13.65, p < 0.001, η p 2 = 0.19.

In a regression analysis, with classification accuracy as the outcome variable, model type and number of hidden states were highly significant regressors ( p < 0.001), and the number of networks was marginally significant ( p = 0.07) ( Supporting Information Table S1 ).

One‐sided likelihood‐ratio (LR) tests pursued to evaluate the statistical significance of the family variance for survival showed highly significant ( p < 0.001) results for the unbrowsed planting in both species, but marginally significant ( p = 0.046) and non‐significant ( p > 0.05) results in the browsed planting in E. ovata and E. pauciflora , respectively (Table S8 ).

The magnitudes of effects for these respondents who believe that an HIV-positive teacher should continue teaching attenuated by 10% and further 5% with the introduction of demographic and socioeconomic measures respectively, turning the previously highly significant estimate (OR=1.46, p≤0.001) into significant (OR=1.31, p≤0.05) and marginally significant (OR=1.24, p≤0.10) when comparing the coefficients in Model 1 to Model 2 and Model 2 to Model 3.

In the Functional Reach Test, there was no significant difference between the pretest values ( Z = −1.07 and p = 0.28), but there were a marginally significant difference between the groups at posttest 1 ( Z = −2.01 and p = 0.04) and a highly significant difference between the posttest 2 values ( Z = −3.40 and p < 0.001) with the experiment group performing better.

In the MAR model, the main factor, time ( X 2 (4) = 8.396, p = 0.078), again is marginally significant, and the interaction between time and baseline HbA1c class ( X 2 (4) = 19.849, p = 0.001) as well as the baseline HbA1c class ( X 2 (1) = 104.195, p < 0.001) are significant.

For the EOS, a likelihood ratio test showed that the interaction between flow regime and drought status was marginally significant ( χ 2 (1) = 10.59, p = 0.001).

These effects are marginally significant ( P = 0.095), but the genetic effects due to differences among four QTL genotype combinations C/C, C/T, T/C, and T/T are highly significant for both species ( P < 0.001) (Fig. 4a ).

Correlations between Urinary Metals, U-PHE, and 8-oxodG Significant, or marginally significant, linear correlations were found between 8-oxodG and the following metals: Mn (r = 0.354, p = 0.001), Tl (r = 0.321, p = 0.002), Zn (r = 0.309, p = 0.003), As (r = 0.309, p = 0.003), Pb (r = 0.283, p = 0.007), Co (r = 0.239, p = 0.024), Ba (r=0.213, p = 0.045), Cr (r = 0.213, p = 0.045), and Cd (r = 0.194, p = 0.071).