“marginally significant”

The analyses revealed a robust distance effect for RT at the whole sample level and in each group separately, with marginally significant between-group differences ( t 55 = − 2.02, p = 0.048, d = − 0.54).

Also a highly significant effect of time on participant’s weight (F (2, 68) = 36.32, P < 0 0.01, ηp 2 = 0.51)was shown and a marginally significant within group effect of supplementation on participant’s weight (F (2, 68) = 3.180, P = 0 0.048, ηp 2 = 0.086).

Results Experiment 1 Recall performance on trivia questions A 2 × 2 ANOVA on free recall rates with the factors age (young, older) and state EC (high, low) revealed no main effect of age (F(1,52) = 1.05, p = 0.31, η 2 p = 0.02), but a significant main effect of state EC (F(1,52) = 165.18, p < 0.001, η 2 p = 0.76), and a marginally significant interaction of age × state EC (F(1,52) = 4.11, p = 0.048, η 2 p = 0.07).

The comparison of the scores between the groups by the analysis of variance ANOVA test showed a marginally significant difference ( P = 0.048).

Taking the known SoFT mutation status in 537 patients into comparison, the marginally significant difference in survival time was present in patients with TARDBP mutations [ TARDBP (+): 2 vs. >2: 58.1 vs. 16.3 months, p = 0.048], while there was no significant difference in patients carrying SOD1 (log-rank p = 0.22), FUS (log-rank p = 0.55), or SoFT(–) (log-rank p = 0.08).

This test revealed a marginally significant overall effect of group (H 2 = 6.09, p = 0.048).

By contrast, only 3.0% of patients in the ‘off label’ group compared with 18.1% in the exclusively licensed group had a history of psychosis, this difference being marginally significant ( p = 0.048).

Inclusion of anti-PfSE antibody data in the pooled regression analysis resulted in a marginally significant rate of decline equivalent to a half-life of 6.4 years (95% CI = 3.22, 650.48; p = 0.048 ).

For hypothesis 2, results did show significant interactions: at follow-up (T 4 ), BTR-NF participants showed marginally significant improvement compared to MTI (BTR-NF: estimate: −8.14, SE: 4.10, P = 0.048).

Indeed, we did find a marginally significant age difference ( p = 0.048) when investigating the absolute decrease in tapping speed instead of the relative decrease.

1 , the prevalence of low and moderate malaria parasitaemia was marginally significant (P = 0.048) in children from low altitude when compared with their high-altitude counterparts and the low parasite density category was the most common in both settings.

However, the analysis showed a marginally significant relation between brood size and body weight of the 4th instar hosts ( χ 2 = 3.65, P = 0.048), with a gradual increase by ca 20% in brood size with each increase of 0.1 mg in host body weight; brood size ranged from 4 to 14 wasps with an average of 9.3 ± 0.3 (±SE) across host body weight from 0.18 to 0.69 mg ( Fig. 1C ).

Growth rate changed over time (Time (ordinal effect) F = 36.63, df = 7, p < 0.0001), and a marginally significant effect indicated that treatment groups varied slightly in growth rate (Treatment F = 2.41, df = 4, p = 0.048).

The iPE model identified significant main effects of sex ( p = 0.002) and a significant sex × age interaction ( p = 0.014), along with a marginally significant level × exposure interaction ( p = 0.048), division × level × age ( p = 0.002) and division × level × exposure ( p = 0.028).

The P -value for the pharmacogenetic effect was marginally significant ( P = 0.048).

The interaction effect between the input modalities and secondary task types was marginally significant [ F (4.09,115.44) = 20.66, η 2 = 0.149, p = 0.048].

Overall, when compared by two-tailed, equal variance student t-test, there was a marginally significant difference between column extractions and HotShot ( p = 0.048) and significant difference for column and water ( p = 0.01), whilst water extractions were also significantly slower than Xtract, XT ( p = 0.02) and QuickExtract, QE ( p = 0.04).

The Bonferroni tests indicate that the mean O values of pairs in which both species were non-stygobites (n,n) were significantly higher than those in which both species were stygobites (s,s) ( P < 0.00001) or in which one species was a stygobite and the other one was not (s,n) ( P < 0.00001); mean O values of s,s and s,n pairs were statistically similar ( P = 0.240). The interaction term was marginally significant ( P = 0.048, Table 2 ), which suggests that the different pair types responded differently in the three years.

82.34±9.61 mmHg, respectively; p<0.001) were also significantly lower at follow-up than at the first visit, whereas systolic pressure showed a marginally significant reduction (123.5±16.57 mmHg vs. 126.83±19.97 mmHg, p=0.048).

.36 in Table 2 ) and no longer significant ( p = .100), although the interaction with the medium-education term is positive and marginally significant under this specification ( p = .048).

Based on post hoc test, the increase of CYP2C6 metabolic activity was marginally significant ( p = 0.048).

However, further adjustment for health risk factors and COVID‐19 concerns attenuated the effects of frequent stress co‐occurrence on all three symptoms (Table 3 , Model 3), with the strongest effect remaining for difficulty initiating sleep (OR = 1.51, p = 0.010), followed by nonrestorative sleep (OR = 1.38, p = 0.042), while frequent nocturnal awakening became marginally significant (OR = 1.38; p = 0.048).

When the coagulation sub-score was removed from the regression model, the liver sub-score became marginally significant as a predictor of hospital mortality (p = 0.048).

MR-Egger and Weighted mode methods showed similar results while Weighted median showed a marginally significant association (OR: 1.15, CI: 1.00–1.32, p = 0.048).

The HR was marginally significant ( p = 0.0480) in the age-adjusted analysis and marginally insignificant in the multivariable analysis ( p = 0.0609).