Barely Significant
← all phrases

“marginally significant”

26,083 sentences · 26,083 papers · 36,483 search hits before verification · confirmed specimen

Sighted at

p>=0.1

Listed by Hankins (2013) · Otte et al. (2022)

In the literature

marginally significantp = 0.0481.0× alphagold
After stepwise removal of all other explanatory terms due to non-significance, there was a significant multivariate effect of male resistance status (Permutational MANOVA marginal test, pseudo- F 1,43 = 4.550, N.perm = 2 × 10 5 , p = 0.012) and a marginally significant effect of female resistance (Permutation MANOVA marginal test, pseudo- F 1,43 = 3.006, N.perm = 2 × 10 5 , p = 0.048) on courtship behaviour.
marginally significantp = 0.0481.0× alphagold
In contrast, sulpiride had a marginally significant effect on the magazine IR beam break rate ( F (2,34) = 3.32; p = 0.048; partial eta squared = 0.163); however, post hoc analysis revealed no significant differences between the drug conditions (saline = 0.0133 ± 0.00491; 25 mg/kg sulpiride = 0.0201 ± 0.01486; 50 mg/kg sulpiride = 0.0175 ± 0.00979; p > 0.05 for all comparisons).
marginally significantP = 0.0481.0× alphagold
This decision was based on two lines of evidence: The three-breakpoint model showed signs of overfitting with a higher 10-fold cross-validation error (CV = 0.070) compared to the one-breakpoint model (CV = 0.066), and the first breakpoint in the two-breakpoint model was located at an extreme end of the data gradient (AI ≈ 0.05), and the P -value for the change in slope at this breakpoint was marginally significant ( P = 0.048).
marginally significantp = 0.0481.0× alphagold
Taking the known SoFT mutation status in 537 patients into comparison, the marginally significant difference in survival time was present in patients with TARDBP mutations [ TARDBP (+): 2 vs. >2: 58.1 vs. 16.3 months, p = 0.048], while there was no significant difference in patients carrying SOD1 (log-rank p = 0.22), FUS (log-rank p = 0.55), or SoFT(–) (log-rank p = 0.08).
marginally significantp = 0.0481.0× alphagold
Fitting the interaction between 7PS and dataset generated a marginal improvement in the model (Chisq = 10.905, p = 0.02352, df = 3), with the interaction 7PS* 35SNP_historical_cats being marginally significant (est = 0.228 ± 0.11, t = 2.00, p = 0.048).