“marginally significant”

This association was marginally significant.

The difference was significant for home to work trip distance (p-value: 0.03) and marginally significant for work to home trip duration (p-value: 0.11), but insignificant for home to work trip duration (p-value: 0.32) and work to home distance (p-value: 0.97).

HapScore test with MNWS score resulted in a marginally significant model ( p global = 0.054).

A study of 2,043 postmenopausal women in the United States found that BMD was 3.8 percent higher in women who had more than 29 drinking occasions per month than those who abstained, although this finding only was marginally significant (because of small numbers of daily drinkers) ( Wosje and Kalkwarf 2007 ).

A single sample t-test, t (22) = 1.77, p = 0.09, d = .037 revealed a marginally significant Error Bias, ( M = 0.05, SD = 0.14).

A significance level of P < .05 (two-sided) was adopted, and effects with a P value between .05 and .10 were indicated as marginally significant.

As presented in the Tables 4 and 5 , we observed a statistically significant decrease in the age and multivariate-adjusted levels of total and non-HDL cholesterol, TC/HDL-C and TG/HDL-C, as well as TGs for both genders (p-value for TGs trend was marginally significant for men).

Younger diagnosis age was marginally significant for being overweight/obese for females aged 5–10 years at diagnosis (RR = 1.14, 95% CI 1.00–1.31) compared to ages 16–20, and the test for trend across age groups was significant at P = 0.03.

In both regressions, the Target Causal Uncertainty X Participant Causal Uncertainty interaction remained at least marginally significant, p s = .053 (controlling for depression/self-esteem) and.041 (controlling for conceitedness).

The difference in variations between left and right RPT was non-significant ( P ƒ?%>ƒ?%0.05), and the heritability of right RPT was marginally significant (lower value of 95% CI was almost 0).

Although there was a marginally significant difference in BES scores between the two groups, no other significant psychometric differences were found.

However, after the examination only serum TSH ( r =−0.190; p =0.05) had a marginally significant negative correlation with QoL.

These show significant (and marginally significant) correlations between the two sentence tasks, and between the consonants and vowels tasks, while the words correlated reasonably well with all other tasks.

While the difference is marginally significant, we believe this observation is important to report since the variability is largely caused by one fetus in each group.

CCA was marginally significant and was also included in the multivariate analysis of grade 3 AE.

This difference was significant in P1, P2 and P3, and marginally significant in P5 (two-tailed t-test).

However, the association between receipt of palliative chemotherapy and patients’ preferred place of death became marginally significant in sensitivity analyses and when we included additional covariates in propensity weighted models; thus, future studies should confirm these results in larger populations.

We could also detect a marginally significant correlation between MPL and homology at MPL 2 when the 20 most promiscuous compounds had been excluded from the network (Figure 7 ).

Passive smoking had a marginally significant association with LTBI among US-born adults and a significant association with LTBI among the foreign-born adults.

The estimated coefficient on the Random treatment dummy is negative and marginally significant.

P values ≤0.05 were considered significant, and values between 0.051 and 0.099 marginally significant.

In some group comparisons, it is possible to observe marginally significant group differences in many network properties but to not observe any single network property that is affected drastically in isolation.

Regarding abstraction, it only exhibits a marginally significant negative association.

All these may contribute to the marginally significant contextual effect of high inequality at baseline on problem drinking, which came out as such only after controlling for the full set of potential confounders.

Mismatch distribution for sudden expansions did not support this finding and, instead, revealed marginally significant expansion patterns for only population 1, corresponding to RR.