“marginally significant”

This relationship remained marginally significant in Model 2 (OR = 0.997, 95% CI: 0.987–1.008, p = 0.044), but lost statistical significance in the fully adjusted model (Model 3: OR = 1.024, 95% CI: 0.998–1.05, p = 0.061).

Notably, 9 of the 12 female and 3 of the 4 male patients with ON were aged 10 years and above, the latter was marginally significant ( P =0.044).

For desirable events, we found a marginally significant main effect of competence (F (1, 44) = 4.32, p = 0.044, ηp 2 = 0.089) but no main effect of warmth (F (1, 44) = 1.77, p = 0.284, ηp 2 = 0.026) or an interaction effect between warmth and competence (F (1, 44) = 0.072, p = 0.407, ηp 2 = 0.016).

The imposition of equality constraints on factor loadings in the model positing metric invariance resulted in a non-significant chi-square difference for grade [ Δχ 2 (12) = 15.7, p = 0.203], and only a marginally significant difference for gender [ Δχ 2 (12) = 21.5, p = 0.044], with negligible changes in the incremental fit indices.

CAR and microbial community As expected CAR was not detected in the control group ( Table 1 ), and based on PERMANOVA performed on Bray-Curtis matrix at an OTU level, CAR had marginally significant influence on microbial communities ( p = 0.044).

Overall, this difference was marginally significant (ANOVA F = 3.627, p-value = 0.044). 3.1 RNA sequencing and gene expression Twelve libraries were paired-end sequenced and the resulting reads mapped to the turkey genome (UMD 5.1, ENSEMBL annotation 104).

( Table 2 ) There was a marginally significant association between being male and having a macroscopically abnormal colon (χ2 = 4.066, p = 0.044).

Three‐way Watson‐Williams test comparing the count vectors of displacement for lesions with medial, lateral, or lateral medial location was marginally significant ( p = .044).

Egger's regression test for publication bias revealed marginally significant ( p =0.044), which indicated the presence of publication bias (additional file: Figure S6).

The only region in which ANOVA showed a marginally significant effect of genotype was vAud (F(2, 45) = 3.343, p = 0.0443; S3 Table ).

Specifically, the filler-to-binder ratio is an extremely significant influencing factor ( p = 0.02), and the crumb rubber content exerted a marginally significant effect on the friction properties ( p = 0.044387, which did not meet the significance criterion after correction).

Juveniles showed marginally significant differences in mortality between treatments (Chi 2 = 11.38, p = 0.0444), whereas mortality of subadults did not differ significantly between the experimental treatments (Chi 2 = 6.0662, p = 0.2998, Table 2 ., Fig. 2 ).

Significance of Lighting, Trap Position, and Weekly Interval for CRB Capture One-way ANOVA of weekly catches conducted separately for each factor (light treatment, trap position, and week of experiment) indicated that lighting had a statistically significant effect on trap catch in CRB panel traps ( p = 1.08 × 10 −5 ; Table 1 ) and that there was a marginally significant variation in total trap catches each week ( p = 0.0445; Table 2 ).

Furthermore, in each successive decade, the median time from initial presentation of symptoms to death remained significantly prolonged in skin versus nonskin IVL in 1960-1980s ( P = 0.0001), 1990s ( P = 0.0211), and 2000s ( P = 0.0007), while the median time from diagnosis to death was marginally significant in 1960–1980s ( P = 0.0445) but insignificant in the 1990s ( P = 0.3287) and 2000s ( P = 0.2946).

Values of serum TSH were not correlated with total dose of estradiol administered, duration of treatment, and endometrial thickness in any group and subgroups, except for a marginally significant value for estradiol dose and TSH at T1 in group B ( p =0.0447).

reported a marginally significant association (OR = 1.19; 95% CI: 1.00–1.42; p = 0.0448) [ 13 ], our RCS analysis found no evidence of a non-linear relationship between WWI and BC prevalence.

The results of the PSM showed that differences in glucocorticoid use between groups remained marginally significant post‐matching ( P = 0.0448).

In contrast, at 24 months assessment, higher mRNA E6 & E7 positivity rates were documented in both groups (6.3%/10% NASBA/flow outcomes, and 17.8%/18.3% NASBA/flow results), a finding marginally significant ( p = 0.0448) when considering the NASBA method but insignificant for the flow approach.

The marginally significant ( p = . 0449) association between AHI and accuracy may owe to the fact that individuals with sleep apnea experience sleep fragmentation, resulting in N1 sleep, one of the most difficult stages to separate; nonetheless, the association was modest (R 2 = 0 . 0751).

% BV/TV group also shows a marginally significant ( p = 0.045) effect on bone regeneration by the scaffold + dental pulp stem cells group compared to the scaffold-only group and has a significant difference between the groups ( p = 0.05) (Fig. 3 ).

The mixed model analysis showed that the effect of treatment on HRSD scores may have varied over time, according to the interaction between treatment and time, which may have been marginally significant (F = 2.405, df = 5, 74.824, p = 0.045).

1 b; A complete list of enriched GO categories is provided in Additional file 2 ). Among DEGs overexpressed in colonies, enrichment of endocrine process (GO:0050886) was marginally significant (Bonferroni-adjusted p -value = 0.045; Additional file 2 ).

Results ( Figure 2 ) indicate that females from the w Ri-infected line showed a marginally significant fecundity advantage relative to the uninfected line ( p = 0.045, t -test) but strain differences were marginally non-significant in the three-way comparison ( F 2,37 = 2.7, p = 0.082).

Forty-eight hours methionine starvation led to a significant decrease in the expression of M2 genes (Mgl2, Ym1 (Chi3I3), Relma (Fizz1), Arg1(marginally significant, p=0.045)), while CD36 and FABP4 were not affected or even inducible ( figure 1D ).

No significant differences were found at the location level, and the Environmental Risk Assessment (ERA) levels explained only a small and marginally significant portion of variation in photo-based NIS dominance ( p = 0.045), with no effect detected in DNA-based datasets.