Barely Significant
← all phrases

“marginally significant”

26,083 sentences · 26,083 papers · 36,483 search hits before verification · confirmed specimen

Sighted at

p>=0.1

Listed by Hankins (2013) · Otte et al. (2022)

In the literature

marginally significantp = 0.0440.9× alphagold
BPI exhibited strong partial mediation, with significant indirect effects through RMDQ ( B = -0.074, 95% CI [-0.130, -0.021]), accounting for 45.1% of the total effect, and through ODI ( B = -0.082, 95% CI [-0.134, -0.033]), accounting for 50.0% of the total effect, alongside marginally significant direct effects ( p = 0.044–0.051).
marginally significantP=0.0440.9× alphagold
Although a marginally significant difference in respiratory scores was noted at PACU admission (0 [0–0] vs. 0 [0–0], P=0.044), while no significant disparities in other parameters [arterial oxygen saturation (SpO 2 ), circulation, consciousness, activity, or total scores; P=0.08 to >0.99] (table available at https://cdn.amegroups.cn/static/public/jtd-2025-27-2.xlsx , sheet 2).
marginally significantp = .0440.9× alphagold
There were also significant interactions: age × dot area ratio, b = −.03, t (320) = −9.65, p < .001, age × numerical ratio, b = .01, t (320) = 2.86, p = .005, convex hull ratio × numerical ratio, b = −.03, t (80) = −5.01, p < .001, and a marginally significant interaction between age × convex hull ratio × numerical ratio, b = −.01, t (320) = −2.03, p = .044.
marginally significantp = 0.0440.9× alphagold
Correlations between individual levels of missing data and F ROH showed no significant relationships for WGS (Pearson's r = −0.15, p = 0.078, Figure S2a ) and a marginally significant relationship with RRS (Pearson's r = 0.17, p = 0.044, Figure S2b ), indicating that estimates of F ROH were unlikely to be substantially confounded by individual variation in missing data.
marginally significantp = 0.0440.9× alphagold
However, participants with moderate depression (BDI = 20–28) had significantly lower BDI scores than those with severe depression (BDI = 29–63) at 3 months (U = 9, Z = −2.218, p = 0.027), with a marginally significant difference observed at 6 months (U = 11, Z = −2.010, p = 0.044).
marginally significantP = 0.0440.9× alphagold
There was significant difference in the prevalence of thrombocytopenia between patients younger than 30 years of age and those aged over 50 years ( P = 0.006); while the difference between patients aged 30–39 years and those aged over 50 years was marginally significant ( P = 0.044, according to Bonferroni correction).