“marginally significant”

However, a marginally significant increase was observed in the left condyle’s angulation.

Furthermore, subgroup analyses generally aligned with overall population trends, except for the subgroup with DM, where their interaction exhibited a marginally significant difference (P for interaction = 0.045).

The marginally significant association observed was the number of children (3–4 children) (OR 1.78, CI [1.15–2.75], p -value 0.010); the significant association observed was that a higher number of children increases the odds of adverse outcomes.

At later periods, 77.7% of OAD users achieved glycemic control versus 64.9% of insulin users, with a marginally significant difference.

The DL group (EMM = 1.32, SE = 0.54) scored higher than the control group (EMM = 0.53, SE = 0.51; t (32.3) = 2.46, p = .058) in the delayed recall trial at a marginally significant level.

Although the RR of mortality was marginally significant, BMMNC and MSC therapy could not decrease the risk of mortality in the longest follow-up period (BMMNC: RR (95% CI) = 0.84 (0.54, 1.32), MSC: RR (95% CI) = 0.83 (0.69, 1.01), between-subgroup p = 0.96).

In model 1, PhenoAgeAccel and GrimAgeAccel had significant mediation effects ( P = 0.014 and P = 0.016, respectively) on the associations between childhood BMI and cIMT, with trends that were similar and marginally significant in model 2.

Only NK PTC showed a marginally significant association with allograft function and survival.

This relation was marginally significant in attorneys and fully significant in controls (with HRV predicting morality ratings in the GL condition).

Vocal emotion recognition was found to be positively associated with the melody and timbre subtests, and marginally significant correlations were found for the rhythm, embedded rhythm, and tempo subtests.

Equation ( 2 ) includes only those terms that were found to be significant, very significant, or marginally significant based on their p-values and F-values (Table 6 ).

For the number of comorbidities, national electronic health databases and clinical records differed on average by <1 comorbidity but with a marginally significant P value of .03 and 95% CIs almost overlapping with zero difference.

The U-shaped association of the TyG index with the risk of cancer-related mortality was marginally significant (P non-linear = 0.047) ( Figures S2 and S3 ).

Multivariate analysis Variables that were statistically significant or marginally significant in the bivariate analysis were used to set up Cox proportional hazard models.

However, we have used statistical procedures to control for multiple comparisons and our results were found significant or marginally significant using a stringent cutoff of 0.05 after adjustment for multiple tests, thus limiting the chance of false positive results.

Women with moderate access had 2.2 times higher odds of utilizing maternal health services compared to those with challenging access [AOR = 2.2, 95% CI: 1.00, 5.32], with a marginally significant p -value of 0.08.

The one marginally significant item, “we usually adhere to medical recommendations”, assessed a behavior that was not a goal of the program.

Conclusions: The results show a marginally significant association between psychosocial support and the mental health of HCWs during COVID-19.

This P value is just above the commonly used significance level of 0.05, suggesting that the relationship between the variables is marginally significant.

Age had a marginally significant correlation with the outcome variable.

In addition, longer TL was associated with a higher mean global quantitative score (β = 3.85; 95% CI = −0.19, 7.89), although the association was marginally significant.

The analysis involving D98% presented a more pronounced dose–response curve, with a β1 of 0.06 and a marginally significant p -value “0.085” with TCP values for 95 and 98%, projected at 56.9 and 73.1 Gy, respectively.

In men, there was marginally significant improvement with the combined model of KRS and GRS compared with the KRS-only model.

There was also a positive correlation between the pNN50 HRV during baseline and pNN50 HRV during the stranger trials of dogs in the crying condition, and a marginally significant correlation was found in dogs in the humming condition.

There were marginally significant differences in the pass rates across the three groups when a pass was defined as obtaining one score, that is, passing one or two sets of the sRIT (Fisher’s exact p = 0.054).