Barely Significant
← all phrases

“marginally significant”

26,083 sentences · 26,083 papers · 36,483 search hits before verification · confirmed specimen

Sighted at

p>=0.1

Listed by Hankins (2013) · Otte et al. (2022)

In the literature

15 Tumlinson et al found only a marginally significant relationship between an available supply of a mix of family planning methods and the level of contraceptive use in Kenya. 16 Conversely, Gage and Zomahoun used geographically linked data collected in Nigeria during the 2009 Community Participation for Action in the Social Sectors project and found
To address confounding, we implemented a rigorous covariate selection protocol: first, clinically plausible variables were pre-specified through literature review; second, univariate screening with an inclusive threshold (P ≤ 0.2) retained marginally significant factors; finally, multivariable models incorporated these predictors alongside established prognostic variables.
A series of sensitivity analyses to cope with missing data did not change the main results, except that 1) the marginally significant associations (including myopathy associated with statin use; dementia, TIA and BMI≥35 associated with high-intensity statin use) in the main analysis vanished but IMD groups 2 and 3 were associated with slightly decreased use of statins when the analysis was restricted to those with individual IMD; and that 2) the associations of BMI≥35 with increased use of any statin and high-intensity statin vanished when the missing value of BMI was replaced by the 95th percentile value.
Compared with the lowest tertile, the second tertile of the healthy dietary pattern had significantly associated with decrease risk of T2D in the crude model (OR: 0.51, 95% Confidence interval [CI]: 0.29–0.9; P for trend = 0.018), Model II that adjusted for sex, age, marriage, education (OR: 0.5, 95% CI: 0.27–0.9; P for trend = 0.019), Model III that adjusted for BMI, WC, cigarette smoking, and physical activity (OR: 0.56, 95% CI: 0.23–1.4 P for trend = 0.048), and in the final fully adjusted Model IV, the association was protective but marginally significant (OR: 0.72, 95% CI: 0.21–2.48; P for trend = 0.064).