“marginally significant”

Statistically significant ( p < .05) and marginally significant variables (p ≤ .10) in the bivariate analyses were added to a series of multiple logistic regression models.

In this context, our exploratory analysis suggested that PTV volume (>13 cc) was marginally significant ( p < 0.1) for toxicity, but this requires validation in the full cohort of 55 patients.

Across all analyses, we used the conventional alpha level of p ≤ 0.05 as the criterion for significance, but also report marginally significant findings (0.05 < p ≤ 0.10), specifying effect sizes in all cases.

As illustrated in Figure 4 , there was a marginally significant interaction effect between time and group on HR, F = 2.73, p = 0.10, η p 2 = 0.05, indicating that HR was significantly decreased within the control group, p = 0.021, while it did not change in the experimental group, p = 0.279.

However, though marginally significant, after inclusion in the RDA analysis, wind emerged as a further important variable ( anova . cca , p < 0.1, S4 Fig ).

When further adjusted for gynecology-related factors (Model 3), the association between moderate/severe dysmenorrhea and a higher level of psychological distress was marginally significant (β = 1.548, p < 0.10), and moderate/severe psychological symptoms of PMS were significantly associated with a higher level of psychological distress (β = 3.978, p < 0.001).

The differences in seasonal net lateral flow between the EC and SC location were significant ( p < .05) in 2017, and marginally significant ( p < .1) between the EC and SBC location in 2018.

It is worth mentioning that pain intensity was a marginally significant (p < 0.1) predictor of moderate pain catastrophizing group membership.

Moreover, the interaction between condition and time was marginally significant ( F (2, 58) = 2.43, p = 0.10, η 2 = 0.07).

The two-way repeated measures ANOVA indicated a marginally significant main effect of stage (F (1, 18) = 3.24, p < 0.1) and a significant marginally interaction between group and stage (F (1, 18) = 3.04, p < 0.1).

Marginally significant terms (0.05 < p < 0.1) remained in the model due to the even minimal interaction effects, contributing to the fit and prediction capability of the regression models to explore subtle interaction effects and reduction of type II errors (Greenland et al. 2016 ; Morganstein and Wasserstein 2014 ).

73), but a marginally significant interaction between Magnitude and Hand ( F (1, 27) = .2.96, p = .10 (two-tailed) or .05 (one-tailed), ƞ 2 = .10).

Only significant ( p ≤ 0.05), or marginally significant ( p ≤ 0.10), associations are described.

However, at t 2 , a marginally significant positive correlation ( p < 0.10) for the total sample and a significant positive correlation ( p < 0.05) for the subsample with good comprehension were found.

In these models, 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) with errors corrected for robust variance were calculated and statistically significant coefficients were considered with a p < 0.05 value and marginally significant, with a p < 0.1 value.

Results for treatment criteria were considered significant at P ≤ 0.05 and marginally significant if 0.05 < P ≤ 0.10.

There was a marginally significant improvement [ M = 3.56, SD = 0.86, p < 0.1] in the therapists' perceptions in terms of therapeutic openness/involvement of the father by comparison to control group A.

However, nonverbal quantitative reasoning and verbal quantitative reasoning appeared as marginally significant (0.05 < P <0.10) predictors of IQ level.

Due to sex differences in associations of parental SEP with health outcomes related to AL [ 28 – 33 ], and because formal tests of interaction with sex were significant ( p < .05) or marginally significant ( p < .10) for four factors (maternal smoking in the final trimester ( p = .058), complications at birth ( p = .072), maternal BMI ( p = .011) and not living with parents at one year ( p = .032), all analyses were stratified by sex.

Analyses of the variability of reaction time (measured as a subject's standard deviation of reaction time) revealed a marginally significant main effect of timbre [ F (3,81) = 2.20, p <0.1]; post-hoc tests determined that response times were marginally more variable during flute-tone discrimination than during pure-tone discrimination ( Table 2 ; p <0.08); no other significant differences were found.

The correlations with maternal negativity were in the expected direction —risk was uncorrelated with negativity for the 7-absent mothers and higher risk was correlated with stronger negativity for the 7-present mothers—but this was only a marginally significant effect ( p <.10).

Objective To cross-culturally validate the Health Mindset Scale for Brazil, as well as adapt the terms and questionnaires for adequate understanding of Brazilians, using factor analysis as an instrument to validate its reliability. Methods Cross-cultural validation of the Health Mindset Scale into Brazilian Portuguese using the Beaton method, Cronbach's alpha calculation and factor analysis Results The sample consisted of 215 patients aged between 18 and 87 years (M = 41.98; SD = 15.72), with a mean age between 31 and 50 years (42.0%), and female (52 .6%), a marginally significant difference (p < 0.10) between men and women was observed for item 3.

Terms were considered significant if P < 0.05 and marginally significant if P < 0.1.

Variables that were at least marginally significant ( p < .10) at the bivariate level were included in each model.

We additionally explored mediation of ideal smoking, ideal physical activity, and ideal nutrition, and only found marginally significant ( P <0.10) indirect effects for ideal smoking in the association of SNs and CHD events for men and women (Tables S1 and S2 ).