“marginally significant”

Potential effect modification by baseline variables was explored by incorporating interaction terms in the statistical models and further investigated if marginally significant ( P < .1).

Therefore, variables with marginally significant effect ( P < 0.1) on univariate analysis, were accounted for in our Cox-regression multivariate analysis (MVA).

ANOSIM statistical testing [ 34 ] on the sex subsets showed that, while all female experimental groups had marginally significantly ( p < 0.1) different fungal distributions from the female control group, only the male VDR ΔLyz group had a marginally significant ( p = 0.081) different distribution from the male VDR ΔLyz group ( Supplementary Figure S4 ).

For employees with low construal level, the positive relationship between EO REO and voice behavior is marginally significant when challenge stressor is high ( Slope = 0.205, S.E. = 0.126, p < 0.1 ) and the positive relationship between EO REO and voice behavior is not significant when challenge stressor is low ( Slope = 0.109, S.E. = 0.128, p > 0.1 ).

Significance level <0.05 was considered in all tests, although marginally significant effects ( p -value <0.1) were also considered. 3.

At the same time, the coefficient for restricted inertia also becomes marginally significant ( β = .735, p < .10).

The mother's breast milk 207Pb/206Pb ratio was found to be a marginally significant predictor of an infant's blood 06Pb/204Pb ratio at p<0.1; however, breast milk lead concentration was not found to be statistically significant at this level.

Furthermore, the Session by Age group by Switching demand interaction F (1,168) = 4.49, MSE = 0.02, η 2 = 0.03, p = 0.04, as well as the Session by Age group by Maintenance demand interaction F (1,168) = 3.63, MSE = 0.02, η 2 = 0.02, p = 0.06 were at least marginally significant ( p < 0.10).

However, due to small sample size at hand, we also reported marginally significant effects with p < 0.1.

We also detected a marginally significant (p < 0.1) increase in the proportion of all mutations that occurred at CpG dinucleotides in the BaP group.

Significance was set at p < 0.05, but we also noted marginally significant associations at p < 0.10, given the exploratory nature of the analysis.

After adjusting for DunedinPACE, all previously observed significant associations remain at least marginally significant (all p < 0.10).

Only in Model B4, the results reported that the interaction between age and social contact network size was marginally significant and positive (Coef. = 0.30, p < .1).

The differences in seasonal net lateral flow between the EC and SC location were significant ( p < .05) in 2017, and marginally significant ( p < .1) between the EC and SBC location in 2018.

More importantly, the interaction effect between the reward type and product customer satisfaction was marginally significant [ F (2,362) = 2.950, p < 0.1, η 2 = 0.016].

Additionally, changes in total cholesterol and CRP following the intervention were marginally significant ( P < 0.10).

Factors that marginally significant differed ( P < 0.1) were included for multivariate logistic regression analysis: parental karyotype abnormality, NK cells, platelet aggregation function, anti-β2 glycoprotein antibody IgA, anti-β2 glycoprotein antibody IgG, EPL, and LV30.

In each case, the statistically significant ( p < 0.05) associations reported in Table 3 remained significant or became marginally significant ( p < 0.1 for two models including income), and nearly all model estimates in the T1I1 group changed by < 10%.

When that parish was removed from the analysis, there was a marginally significant ( p > 0.10) difference in the group education offerings in CE parishes as compared with SD churches (63 vs 36 %).

Results There was a marginally significant difference of disease-free survival at five years in favor of the CRT arm (51.3% vs. 41.8%, respectively; p=0.10).

There was a statistically significant dose response in the bromodeoxyuridine (BrdU) S-phase labeling index (LI) in the DEN-initiated rats (p < 0.01) and a marginally significant trend in the saline-treated rats (p = 0.10), but proliferating cell nuclear antigen S-phase LI and growth fraction within altered hepatic foci showed no increase.

Individual species of non-polar lipids that displayed statistically significant (p<0.05) and marginally significant (p<0.10) changes in quantities were shown in Figure 3B–C .

Results of our sensitivity analysis were similar for overall and individual gatekeeper behaviors except for questioning, which became marginally significant ( p = 0.10).

A difference was declared significant when P ≤ 0.05 and marginally significant when 0.05 < P ≤ 0.10.

Months of food sufficiency was found positive but has marginally significant effect (p < 0.1) on the likelihood of engaging in community groups.