“marginally significant”

Potential predictors are defined as variables with a marginally significant association (p<0.10) with the outcome variable.

All data are reported as least square means and considered statistically significant at P ≤ 0.05 and marginally significant at 0.05 < P ≤ 0.10.

Variables that were marginally significant ( p < 0.10) in the univariate analysis, and that had clinical relevance were included in the regression models.

Statistical Analysis Statistical analyses were performed using R statistical software (version 3.6.1, R Foundation, https://www.r-project.org/ , last accessed 25 October 2021), where a p -value (after Bonferroni corrections for pairwise comparisons using the t -test) of < 0.05 was considered significant ( p < 0.001 presented as **, 0.001 ≤ p < 0.05 as *), 0.05 ≤ p < 0.1 as marginally significant (presented as # ) and p ≥ 0.1 as nonsignificant (presented as ns).

However, the Commercial treatment promoted an 18% reduction in g s compared with the Control ( p < 0.10, marginally significant) ( Figure 4 a).

For the correlations of inferior frontal gyrus and superior temporal gyrus activation with memory loss marginally significant differences between groups in height of correlation were observed (( z = 1.47 and z = 1.34 p <0.10, one-tailed).

For the Avicularia/Laciniata lineage marginally significant ( p -value <0.1) results were obtained for linear axes slightly south of due east and between ∼230° to 270° ( Fig. 1e ).

Independent variables with statistically significant or marginally significant ( p < 0.10) association with the recommended oral and denture hygiene practices were further included in logistic regression analyses.

Results were considered significant if P ≤ 0.05 and marginally significant if 0.05 < P ≤ 0.10.

Results were considered significant at P ≤ 0.05 and marginally significant at P ≤ 0.10.

A marginally significant trend between elevated HIF-1α levels and the following variables was also observed: pre-menopausal women (p = 0.10), reduced pathologic response ( p = 0.12) and higher clinical response ( p = 0.09).

The term for the interaction between Internet use status and gender was marginally significant (β = −0.937, p < 0.1), indicating that the depressive-symptom-reducing effect of Internet use status was approximately one CES-D point greater for left-behind older men than for left-behind older women.

These robustness analyses (Table 2 ) reveal consistent findings with those presented in Table 1 for H2, but we do find evidence consistent with H1 (a marginally significant point estimate of 0.331, p < 0.1 for value aligned treatments, i.e., an increase in donations of 0.3 of a token).

Further, we observed a significant effect of ROI [ F (4, 212) = 7.181, p < 0.001, η p 2 = 0.12] and a marginally significant effect of group [ F (1, 53) = 3.378, p < 0.1, η p 2 = 0.06].

Upon multivariate analysis and after adjusting for sex, age, and other factors that were at least marginally significant in univariate analysis (p<0.1) ( Table 2 ), high frequency of headache for the most recent 3 months following the last follow-up was related with poor functional outcomes (hazard ratio [HR], 1.06; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.01–1.11; p=0.011) and the occurrence of cognitive dysfunction (HR, 1.05; 95% CI, 1.01–1.09; p=0.017), but not with the occurrence of cardiovascular disease (HR, 0.99; 95% CI, 0.93–1.05; p=0.905) ( Table 3 ).

Having been apprehended as a child was also marginally significant (at a level of p<0.10) in our final multivariable model (AOR = 1.48; 95%CI 0.90–2.43), and age was not statistically significant (AOR = 1.00 (95% 0.97–1.03)).

Different suicidal ideation rates were assessed by a multivariate logistic regression model using the variables that were at least marginally significant, with p<0.10 in the univariate analysis, and other significant factors according to previously published studies.

We observed a significant main effect of S1-R1 compatibility, F (1, 15) = 8.29, p < 0.05, partial η 2 = 0.36, and a marginally significant main effect of S1-R2 compatibility, F (1, 15) = 3.50, p < 0.10, partial η 2 = 0.19 (note that only trials of the 0 ms SOA of the joint condition were included in the present analyses), indicating faster RTs for compatible trials than for incompatible trials.

However, the difference in estimates between White and Latinx people was marginally significant ( p < 0.10), and the estimates for the other two races did not differ significantly from that of White people.

BCVA before treatment and imaging findings showed marginally significant associations ( P <0.1).

The race–SES association also has a marginally significant positive relationship ( p <.10) with SES achievement gradients, indicating that district SES and average test scores are modestly more strongly associated with one another in states where district SES is highly correlated with racial composition.

In addition, boys in HPD were found to be at marginally significant higher risk for wheezing symptoms, phlegm without colds, and current and life-time asthma compared to those in LPD (adjusted ORs ranged from 1.71 to 2.82, P < 0.10).

Statistical analysis Multiple logistic regression models were fit for the three dependent variables (i.e., suicidality, poor general mental health and significant depressive symptoms), adjusted for background variables that were significant or marginally significant in univariate analysis ( p < 0.1).

Household income significantly predicted increased levels of cooperation, with high-income individuals donating 84 p more than low-income individuals (β = 0.84 [0.09; 1.59], p < 0.05; Table S4 and Figure 2 ) People experienced a marginally significant increase in the feelings of sectarian threat during the riots, compared to before and after the riots (β = 0.25 [−0.03, 0.52], p < 0.1; Table S5 ).

We found a marginally significant ( p < .10) negative association between the muffinhead advertisement and the long-term expectation scale, indicating a higher receptivity to Muffinhead was associated with lower long-term expectations.