“marginally significant”

Both of these effects fell short of statistical significance in multivariate analysis, although the effect of receptive language score on costs remained marginally significant (0.05<P<0.1) after adjusting for the effects of cochlear implantation and AMC on costs but not when additional adjustment for severity of PCHL was added into the model ( table 5 ).

Finally, despite low statistical power ( n = 3), we observed marginally significant trends ( P < 0.10) between key metabolic pathways and HIX ( Table 3 ).

However, this is only significant for South Africa (CI = − 0.0573; p < 0.05), and marginally significant for Zambia (CI = − 0.0341; P < 0.1) and Zimbabwe (CI = − 0.0357; p < 0.1).

In addition, in Model 3 the influence of an “integration” ethnic orientation went from non-significant to marginally significant (p < .10) and the influence of an “attenuation” ethnic orientation went from significant at p < .05 to non-significant.

A further seven CNVs (6 with negative clines, 2 of which were deletions) had marginally significant frequency clines (adjusted P < 0.10).

Multivariable stepwise logistic regression analysis was performed with adjustments for age, gender, hyperlipidemia, hypertension, smoking status, anterior and inferior Sm, posterior MLA, and other variables with marginally significant differences (P < 0.100) in univariate analyses in order to investigate the independent determinant of functional ischemic MR.

Comparing two groups showed no significant difference ( P = 0.06) that was marginally significant ( P < 0.1).

Type III sums of squares were used in all analyses (‘car’ package) to account for unequal numbers of observations among treatment groups, and effects were considered significant if P ≤ 0.05 and marginally significant if P ≤ 0.10.

Moreover, the interaction between condition and time was marginally significant ( F (2, 58) = 2.43, p = 0.10, η 2 = 0.07).

For visual-orthographic deficits, the high-functioning dyslexics showed a marginally significant lower proportion compared to their typical-functioning dyslexics, z = −1.66, p = .10.

prerestoration, but in this case both SRP and TP were marginally significant ( p < 0.10).

To evaluate independent factors associated with the presence of moderate-to-large pleural effusion at weaning start or with failure of the weaning process, significant or marginally significant ( p < 0.10) bivariate risk factors (using the above mentioned tests) were examined using univariate and multivariable backward stepwise logistic regression analysis.

Results revealed significant differences in satisfaction with symptom management ( P <.001) and SDS-15 scores ( P= .04), and marginally significant differences in perceived control over symptoms ( P= .10) across adherence categories.

Results show that when we entered proactive personality, career adaptability and their interaction item into the regression model, proactive personality had a significant positive effect on performance ( B = 0.32, p < 0.001), whereas the effect of career adaptability on performance is marginally significant ( B = 0.122, p = 0.10).

As expected, the judges rated participants in the high-power group as significantly more powerful ( M = 4.78, SD = 1.69) than those in the low-power group [ M = 2.17, SD = 1.38, t (68) = 7.06, p < 0.001, Cohen’s d = 1.72] and marginally significant more power than those in the control group [ M = 4.18, SD = 1.02, t (62) = 1.68, p = 0.10, Cohen’s d = 0.43].

Wilcoxon's signed-rank test revealed a marginally significant difference (defined as when 0.05 ≤ p < 0.1) between both conditions ( z = 1.83, p = 0.068).

Post-estimation tests show that in model a (ages 60–70) mortality in the shortest duration band is statistically significantly different from the longest duration band for males ( HR = 2.48 ; p < 0.05) and marginally significant for females ( HR = 3.71 ; p < 0.10).

The Cox-proportional hazard model was used for the multivariate survival analysis with adjustments for variables that were significant ( P < 0.05) or marginally significant (0.05 ≤ P < 0.10) prognostic factors according to the univariate analysis.

Small-worldness σ was widely reduced in AP within EC gamma, EC alpha, and EO alpha with significant ( p < 0.05) or marginally significant ( p < 0.10) group differences across one or two thresholds each (Fig. 1 ).

In the multivariable analysis, we incorporated lifestyle and psychosocial variables any category of which was statistically significant or marginally significant ( P < .1) in univariable analyses considering the possibility of multicollinearity.

For white women, effects of sexual harassment grievance procedures are negative and marginally significant ( P < 0.10) among workplaces in the fourth quartile of women managers.

= 0.56, p < .01) and marginally significant through teacher reports (P.E. = 0.33, p < .10).

Subsequently, multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed by adjusting for factors that showed a marginally significant association ( p < 0.1) in the univariate analysis.

Finally, there was a marginally significant relationship between thermal cutaneous thermal pain threshold challenge and μOR BP ND in the right amygdala (β = 0.3, 95%CI = (-0.07,0.68), P-value = 0.1) ( Fig. 2 D).

Waiting time had a marginally significant ( p < 0.10) negative coefficient for quality. 4.