“marginally significant”

Mlh1 and Recq4 were marginally significant ( P < 0.10).

While genome-wide association analysis identified 302 genes harboring at least one SNP associated with Lr20 virulence ( p < 0.05), a Wilcoxon rank sum test revealed that 36 and 68 genes had significant ( p < 0.05) and marginally significant ( p < 0.1) differences in the counts of non-synonymous mutations between Lr20 avirulent and virulent groups, respectively.

A linear regression with random effects with RT as the dependent variable shows a marginally significant effect of SVO ( B = −0.58, 95% CI [−1.27 to 0.11], P value = 0.1), and a significant effect of trial number ( B = −0.01, 95% CI [−0.011 to −0.0091], P value < 0.001, Wald χ 2 = 413.20).

Comparisons were considered significant at p<0.05 and marginally significant at p<0.1 (both p values were 2-tailed).

In particular, five genes ( RFX7 , SORCS2 , FAF1 , ABCA5 and NCF4 ) were marginally significant within FDR-corrected p -value < 0.1 (Table 3 ).

handedness mathematics lateralization non-linearity cognitive ability The multi-level linear models showed a significant effect of age, no effect of gender, and only a marginally significant ( p < 0.10) effect of H 4 (Table 1 ).

For the positive ROI, the difference of P300 between herding and antiherding was marginally significant [ F (1, 20) = 3.65, p < 0.1], and the amplitude of P300 elicited by antiherding (M = 9.46, SE = 1.25) was more positive than that by herding (M = 8.96, SE = 1.18).

For predictive factors that were marginally significant ( P < 0.1), we calculated the ORs and 95% CIs in multivariable-adjusted logistic regression analyses.

Results were considered significant with P -values ≤ 0.05 and were considered marginally significant with P -values ≤ 0.10.

In the subpopulation with baseline 24-h SBP ≥155 mmHg, the pooled effect of RDN was marginally significant (MD = −2.92 mmHg; 95% CI : −6.36–0.53 mmHg; P = 0.10).

Any variable showing a correlation was further tested in a relevant exploratory regression model to determine if any marginally significant relationship ( P <0.10) was evident.

Even though the eCDSS did not manage to significantly improve the overall process quality of ANC and childbirth care, there were marginal positive changes in ANC history taking (marginally significant at p < 0.1), interpersonal performance (marginally significant at p < 0.1) and continuity of care (significant at p < 0.05).

In addition, we found marginally significant differences ( p < 0.1) for “friendly–unfriendly,” “non-enjoyable–enjoyable,” and “restless–calm.” The results show that the respondents found the thinned forest environment more friendly, favorable, and calm. 3.2.2.

SG mutation frequencies at doses of 0.125, 0.250, and 0.500 Gy were reduced by BCE combination treatment with significant and marginally significant differences ( p < 0.1, p < 0.1 and p < 0.05, respectively).

Marginally significant differences ( P < 0.10) were found in age and BMI between HC and GWI with the GWI group being older and having a higher BMI.

There was a significant association between smoking and dyspepsia ( p <0.05), as well as a marginally significant association between inadequate sleep and dyspepsia (p<0.10).

The finding was marginally significant ( p < 0.10) for the Work and Welfare group.

Additionally, the use of public transportation was marginally significant ( p < 0.1).

Marginally significant ( 0.05 < p < 0.1 ) and statistically significant ( p < 0.05 ) volume differences are shown in Table 2 as boldfaced and italicized boldfaced values, respectively.

Potential predictors are defined as variables with at least a marginally significant association (p<0.10) with the outcome.

However, the three-way interaction between adolescent disadvantage, college completion, and black/Hispanic identity was positive (OR = 1.44) and marginally significant ( P < 0.10).

This has a number of implications including risk of biased overestimation of explained variation (which we accounted for by reporting an adjusted R 2 value) and risk of overfitting of models (as a result of which we dropped several marginally significant (0.05<P<0.1) variables from final models, and our fitted model has at least 10 practices per variable which is adequate in view of simulation studies showing that a minimum of only two SPV may suffice in linear regression for adequate estimation of regression coefficients). 24 More problematically, there is relatively limited power for identifying practice characteristics significantly associated with trial participation, and for examining variation in intervention implementation and outcomes.

Marginally significant interaction terms ( P < 0.1) between sex and Pb were observed for LINE-1 (tibia and early childhood Pb), H19 (tibia Pb), and HSD11B2 (patella Pb).

On day 173 in 2015, we detected a marginally significant positive dependence of g s and T r on soil water content ( P < 0.1; Figure 3 ), while the relationships between soil water content and A were not statistically significant ( P = 0.531; Figure 3 ).

The results were considered statistically significant if p < 0.05 and marginally significant if p < 0.10.