“marginally significant”

Each 10-percentage point increase in the NRA to tradable agriculture was associated with a small but significant increase of 0.02 (95% CI: 95% CI: 0.00–0.05) in HAZs and of 0.05 (95% CI: 0.02–0.09) in WAZs, with a marginally significant increase ( p < 0.10) of 0.04 (95% CI: -0.01-0.08) for WHZs (Model 1).

In contrast, a marginally significant interaction between type and ambiguity was observed in medial parietal cortex, F 1,14 = 3.03, P < 0.10, d = 0.47, such that the region responded more during unambiguous than ambiguous inferences about beliefs but more during ambiguous than unambiguous inferences about preferences; however, neither the main effect of ambiguity ( P > 0.45) nor the main effect of content ( P > 0.76) approached significance in this region.

However, moderate or low electrical conductivity and low concentrations of total nitrogen, dissolved inorganic nitrogen, ammonia nitrogen, nitrites, total organic carbon, and lithium can be considered as favoring proper functioning and further growth of Salix lapponum individuals (marginally significant at p < 0.10).

Significant ( p < .05) and marginally significant ( p < .10) interactions were probed by testing the conditional effects of the predictor at three levels of the moderator (mean and ± 1 SD ).

Marginally significant results (i.e., .05 < p < .10) were coded as significant, not null, for this purpose.

Our IV OLS results in Table 8 suggest a negative, though statistically insignificant, association between retirement and alcohol consumption (β = −0.347; p < 0.01), while retirement has a marginally significant positive effect on participation in physical activity (β = 33.22; p < 0.10).

The degree was not found to be significantly different between the two groups, but the difference in HSI was significant ( p < .05) and that of ENH and HPDI were marginally significant ( p < .1, but >.05).

Results were considered significant at P < 0.05, and marginally significant at 0.05 < P < 0.10.

In MDD, we found significant correlations between AD values derived from free-water corrected data and scores from the PSWQ and PDSS (findings for the PSS were marginally significant at 0.05 < p < 0.10) such that, as scores on these stress measures increased, free-water corrected AD decreased (see Fig. 3 for scatter plots depicting these results).

Results show that when we entered proactive personality, career adaptability and their interaction item into the regression model, proactive personality had a significant positive effect on performance ( B = 0.32, p < 0.001), whereas the effect of career adaptability on performance is marginally significant ( B = 0.122, p = 0.10).

Significant differences are reported at the P ≤ 0.05 level and marginally significant differences are reported at the P ≤ 0.10 level throughout.

Multivariate logistic regression analysis of the risk factors for GERD symptoms The six variables that showed a significant ( p <0.05) or marginally significant (0.05⩽ p <0.1) association with the risk of GERD symptoms in univariate analysis were tested as predictor variables in multivariate logistic regression analysis (Table 5 ).

All results were considered significant with P ≤ 0.05 and marginally significant with P ≤ 0.10.

The results were considered significant at p < 0.05 and marginally significant at 0.05 ≤ p ≤ 0.10.

Having been apprehended as a child was also marginally significant (at a level of p<0.10) in our final multivariable model (AOR = 1.48; 95%CI 0.90–2.43), and age was not statistically significant (AOR = 1.00 (95% 0.97–1.03)).

Results were considered significant at P ≤ 0.05 and marginally significant at P ≤ 0.10.

In addition, exposure to Tupange's Jongo Love radio program was marginally significant (OR = 1.29; P ≤ .10).

For all three experiments, results were considered significant at P ≤ 0.05 and marginally significant at 0.05 > P ≤ 0.10.

10.7717/peerj.15387/supp-5 Table S4 Summary of the GLMM of the effect of adaptive training on test scores Results for the delayed test were marginally significant. p < 0.1; * p < 0.05; ** p < 0.01 Click here for additional data file. 10.7717/peerj.15387/supp-6 Table S5 Summary of the Wald test for differences in posttest scores between groups . p < 0.1; * p < 0.05; ** p < 0.01; *** p < 0.001 Click here for additional data file. 10.7717/peerj.15387/supp-7 Tab

There was marginal evidence of improvement in positive affect and negative affect—the effects were in the theorized direction, but either marginally significant ( p < 0.10) or non-significant.

In a separate adjusted Andersen-Gill model in which the duration of IV antibiotics was modeled with adjustment for all fixed baseline covariates, baseline age remained significantly associated with having an exacerbation event ( p = 0.04) and marginally significant in all other models ( p < 0.10).

Marginally significant variables, those considered clinically relevant, and all major interactions were included in the univariate analysis (p <0.10).

Marginally significant increases in odor intensities were also detected in the neck and head regions of teenagers and children, respectively (Wilcoxon test p -value < 0.1).

The coefficient for the interaction term of active mediation and supportive profile was marginally significant ( b = −0.119, p < 0.1), indicating that the association between active mediation and leisure-related use within supportive parenting was different from that within slightly-involved parenting profile.

However, reductions in sexual IPV and severe physical/sexual IPV at endline among the women with disabilities had point estimates identical to those for women without disabilities, and remained marginally significant at the p<0.10 level.