“marginally significant”

Data were considered significant at P < 0.05 and marginally significant at P < 0.1.

Within bamboo stands results varied, but with a tendency for spatial aggregation, as I a values were high and significant (or marginally significant, i.e., P < 0.10; Table 2 ).

The somatic SHC (12.0% mediated, p = .088) was marginally significant ( p < .1).

Furthermore, as hypothesized in H3a and H3b, we found a marginally significant positive correlation between BS and Machiavellism ( r = .12, p < .10), representing a small effect and a significant correlation between BS and agentic values ( r = .31, p < .01), representing a moderate effect.

annua , in Experiment II the number of leaves was slightly (marginally significant at p < 0.1) higher, while the number of inflorescences was significantly higher for AM than for NM plants. 2.2.

Within ecosystem types or climate zones, 15 out of 20 comparisons between plants and soil bacteria/fungi were significant ( P < 0.05) or marginally significant ( P < 0.10), and these all showed greater declines for plants.

The fit was marginally significant ( p < 0.1).

S5, Supplementary Material online) and an additional 6 lines with marginally significant P values (permutation test, 0.05 < P < 0.1).

Additionally, the use of public transportation was marginally significant ( p < 0.1).

Providing some support for H1, psychological demands were negatively related to positive well-being at work, flourishing, and work performance; however, the relationship with work performance was trending (i.e., marginally significant, p < 0.10).

(e) There was marginally significant difference of CD44T expression according to N factors (p = 0.10), and CD44T expression was rather reduced in N2 factor.

Simultaneously, openness to experience demonstrated a marginally significant positive relationship with job-seeking behavior (β = 0.08, p < 0.10), consistent with this personality trait’s association with exploration and novelty-seeking.

Predictors were retained when marginally significant ( p < 0.1), in case the significance changed in final, more complete models.

Finally, our age-stratified analyses demonstrated that while middle-aged adults (45–64 years) generally exhibited stronger mediation effects of internet use in the cognition-depression pathway compared to older adults (≥65 years), with most comparisons reaching statistical significance (p < 0.05), some pathways showed marginally significant differences (0.05 < p < 0.1) that warrant cautious interpretation.

Aside from one coefficient, marginally significant at the (p<0.1) level, there appears to be no systematic response to children victims.

Alpha diversity, measured by OTU richness (r = −0.398, P < 0.1, marginally significant) and Shannon–Wiener index (r = −0.66, P < 0.01, significant), was negatively correlated with mean annual precipitation (Table S2 , Supporting Information).

The positive effect of wastewater treatment remained significant (β = 0.158, p < 0.05), whereas the coefficient of ammonia nitrogen emissions became weaker and marginally significant (β = −0.132, p < 0.10).

Laccaria laccata had a significant correlation ( p < 0.05) with Co, and marginally significant correlations ( p < 0.10) with As and Mn, and Volvopluteus gloiocephalus with Fe.

RERI increased with more extreme exposures and was statistically significant for extreme exposures above the 97th percentile (at P < 0.05) and was marginally significant for the 90th, 95th, and 99th percentiles (at P < 0.1).

While caregivers’ preferences had a marginally significant association with patients’ actual place of death ( p -value < 0.10), we did not find any association between patients’ preferred and actual place of death.

A marginally significant group effect on the position weighting factor was found with higher weighting of position in CRPS-patients with fixed dystonia than in controls (p<0.10).

The amount of protein intake increased more in the male subjects who developed GI than in those who did not (albeit to marginally significant, p<0.1).

There was a significant difference in meat intake (p<0.05) and a marginally significant difference in the intake of animal fat (p<0.1) and polyunsaturated fatty acid (p<0.1) between response categories of FBC2 and DR.

Quadratic relationships between zygomatic major activity and experienced/recognized valence were not significant, except for a marginally significant correlation between squared zygomatic major activity and experienced valence under the dynamic condition in Study 1 ( p <0.1).

In the sensitivity analysis that considered marginally significant correlates (ie, p < 0.1), we additionally included IADL and contact with healthcare systems to logistic models.