“marginally significant”

Circular Material Usage shows a marginally significant negative effect (−3.995, p < 0.1), suggesting that adoption of circular economy practices contributes to FW reduction, supporting sustainability objectives.

Furthermore, posthoc t -tests between the conditions (not shown in in Table 3 ) with and without inoculation actually suggest that three of the inoculation conditions were statistically higher in negative affect compared to respondents assigned to conditions without inoculation (the political with inoculation condition for the HPV vaccine treatment on distress and the combined politicization with inoculation COVID treatment conditions for both irritation and distress) and three more were marginally significant at the P < 0.1 level (controversy and political inoculation conditions on irritation and uncertainty inoculation on distress, which were P = 0.08 for all three). 5.2.

Cox proportional hazard regression modelling, in which the length of the employment period of nail technicians was considered as time at risk, with right censoring based on the occurrence of plasma biomarker levels falling beyond the normal plasma range, revealed certain marginally significant ( p ≈ 0.10) suggestions that the proportions of nail technicians with plasma levels of HDL and fGlu beyond respective normal ranges tend to rise faster over time under higher Σ( C i / N i ) values.

It was also interesting to point out the presence of values of p marginally significant (0.05≤p<0.10), indicating a statistical tendency of improved performance of the FrOr model in terms of Rd in patients with abnormal performance in the ADL-Glitre test and MSE Xrs in conditions of normal performance in the Handgrip analysis ADL-Glitre test.

Upon multivariate analysis and after adjusting for sex, age, and other factors that were at least marginally significant in univariate analysis (p<0.1) ( Table 2 ), high frequency of headache for the most recent 3 months following the last follow-up was related with poor functional outcomes (hazard ratio [HR], 1.06; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.01–1.11; p=0.011) and the occurrence of cognitive dysfunction (HR, 1.05; 95% CI, 1.01–1.09; p=0.017), but not with the occurrence of cardiovascular disease (HR, 0.99; 95% CI, 0.93–1.05; p=0.905) ( Table 3 ).

Further, we observed a significant effect of ROI [ F (4, 212) = 7.181, p < 0.001, η p 2 = 0.12] and a marginally significant effect of group [ F (1, 53) = 3.378, p < 0.1, η p 2 = 0.06].

Marginally significant differences ( p < 0.1) were found between SXDL3 and SXHZ1 ( p = 0.07895), NMG and SXHZ1 ( p = 0.05159), HB and SXDL3 ( p = 0.06252), NMG and SXDL1 ( p = 0.08621), and NMG and HB ( p = 0.06511). 3.3.

Retaining “marginally significant” covariates in the final model (ie, using a cutoff of P <.10 as opposed to P <.05) constitutes a more conservative test of the independent predictive ability of each variable, while eliminating those that did not approach significance in earlier models reduces noise and increases parsimony.

Marginally significant interactions ( p < 0.1) were explored with pairwise comparisons for the frontal and parietal electrode sites separately, with Bonferroni correction to correct for multiple comparisons.

Additionally, while results at AUMC indicated a marginally significant decrease in CMT in the hypertension cohort compared with the control cohort during the follow-up period (all P <0.1), no significant differences were observed at SNUBH.

Results show that when we entered proactive personality, career adaptability and their interaction item into the regression model, proactive personality had a significant positive effect on performance ( B = 0.32, p < 0.001), whereas the effect of career adaptability on performance is marginally significant ( B = 0.122, p = 0.10).

(2018) , who found leaf mass per area (LMA), leaf δ 13 C and leaf N per area positively correlated to rainfall during the dry seasons ( i.e ., negatively to dry season intensity) of the place of origin of the clones, and marginally significant ( p < 0.1) correlations with wood traits.

We observed a significant main effect of S1-R1 compatibility, F (1, 15) = 8.29, p < 0.05, partial η 2 = 0.36, and a marginally significant main effect of S1-R2 compatibility, F (1, 15) = 3.50, p < 0.10, partial η 2 = 0.19 (note that only trials of the 0 ms SOA of the joint condition were included in the present analyses), indicating faster RTs for compatible trials than for incompatible trials.

In addition, we found marginally significant differences ( p < 0.1) for “friendly–unfriendly,” “non-enjoyable–enjoyable,” and “restless–calm.” The results show that the respondents found the thinned forest environment more friendly, favorable, and calm. 3.2.2.

This differential distribution of the valence effect across midline electrodes was reflected by a marginally significant valence × electrode interaction (F(2,30) = 2.5, P = 0.1).

Past household wealth (measured in 2016): that is, being in the middle/highest wealth tercile versus the lowest was a marginally significant protective factor in India (0.78, 95% CI 0.59 to 1.04, p<0.1) and significant in Vietnam (0.55, 95% CI 0.40 to 0.75, p<0.01).

73), but a marginally significant interaction between Magnitude and Hand ( F (1, 27) = .2.96, p = .10 (two-tailed) or .05 (one-tailed), ƞ 2 = .10).

The number of diseases encountered has a marginally significant negative effect (p<0.10), with each additional disease encountered on the farm associated with a 21% decrease in the odds of having a satisfactory perception of protective measures.

Past–negative TP showed a marginally significant negative effect on promotion focus (β = -0.13, p < 0.10, SE = 0.06) and innovativeness (β = -0.31, p < 0.00, SE = 0.09); thus, H1a, H1b, H2a, and H2b were supported.

glutamic acid (D), proline (K)} had a marginally significant (0.05< p ≤0.10) positive association with elevation, and ten others { e . g . alanine (A), arginine (B), aspartic acid (C), glycine (E), histidine (F), leucine (H), phenylalanine (J), serine (L), threonine (M), and valine (O)} had not appreciable association with elevation ( p >0.10) ( Fig 4 ).

Even though the eCDSS did not manage to significantly improve the overall process quality of ANC and childbirth care, there were marginal positive changes in ANC history taking (marginally significant at p < 0.1), interpersonal performance (marginally significant at p < 0.1) and continuity of care (significant at p < 0.05).

In the Botanical Garden (data-subset I), it was slightly (marginally significant, p < 0.1) affected by tree age and significantly by herbivory (Table 1 ).

The main effect of training amount was marginally significant, F (3, 43) = 2.383, p < 0.1.

Results revealed significant differences in satisfaction with symptom management ( P <.001) and SDS-15 scores ( P= .04), and marginally significant differences in perceived control over symptoms ( P= .10) across adherence categories.

Two additional analyses emerged as marginally significant ( p < .10).