“marginally significant”

In addition, 31% of corals from Butaritari (N = 13) had partial mortality scars associated with the 2004 bleaching event, while none from Abaiang and North Tarawa showed such scars (N = 12); this difference was marginally significant (p = 0.10, permutation test).

2I ), and was marginally significant for the occipital region ( P = 0.10).

Leader narcissism showed a marginally significant negative relation with entrepreneurial team performance (β = −0.241, p < 0.10).

In line with H5, we observe a marginally significant interaction effect of error risk taking and perceived organizational innovation climate (β = 0.16, p < 0.1, 95% CI [−0.00, 0.32]).

There were two variables with a marginally significant ( p ≤ 0.10) association with condoms use at last sex: having sex with more than one sexual partner (AOR 3.38; 95% CI 0.87, 13.10) and speaking to at least one sex partner about HIV testing (AOR 0.38; 95% CI 0.14, 1.02).

Results Which lighting condition maximizes the number and size of clones that a mother generated? By the fourth week of the experiment, the mother phenotype differentially responded to lighting conditions (MANOVA: F 39,192 = 3.68, P<0.001) and genotype (MANOVA: F 13,62 = 31.25, P<0.001) and their interaction was marginally significant (MANOVA: F 39,192 = 1.34, P = 0.10).

Covariates were selected based on the following criteria: (1) a priori knowledge from the literature, (2) significant or marginally significant differences in baseline characteristics between study groups ( p < 0.10), and (3) statistically significant associations ( p < 0.05) when included in initial LMMs. 65 To assess the persistence of treatment effects, WOMAC measures at baseline and at three months post-intervention were also compared.

The binomial logistic regression models contained all variables with marginally significant differences (p values < 0.1) 30 in the univariate analysis.

Retaining “marginally significant” covariates in the final model (ie, using a cutoff of P <.10 as opposed to P <.05) constitutes a more conservative test of the independent predictive ability of each variable, while eliminating those that did not approach significance in earlier models reduces noise and increases parsimony.

The partisan associations became marginally significant ( P < .1) after omitting nonexpansion states ( Appendix Table A3 ).

However, in the case of arousal (χ 2 =5.2, P=0.074), the dominance subscale (χ 2 =5.14, P=0.076), and the number of intrusive memories (χ 2 =5.35, P=0.069), a marginally significant difference between groups was found (0.05<P<0.10).

All calculations and analyses were conducted in the statistical program R version 4.2.3 (R Core Team 2023 ) ( α = 0.05, with results 0.05 < p < 0.1 reported as marginally significant). 3.

A two-sided t -test indicated that the difference between these two means was marginally significant ( t 4341 = 1.29; p = .10).

In a separate adjusted Andersen-Gill model in which the duration of IV antibiotics was modeled with adjustment for all fixed baseline covariates, baseline age remained significantly associated with having an exacerbation event ( p = 0.04) and marginally significant in all other models ( p < 0.10).

Other marginally significant ( p < 0.1) pairwise comparisons were also evidenced for Co-Production.

For T2, the correlation coefficient for Yourself for perceived support by older relatives was marginally significant ( p < 0.1), while the coefficients for both Yourself and Future generations were both significant for perceived support to younger relatives ( p < 0.001).

Tests were considered statistically significant when p < 0.05 (*), p < 0.01 (**), p < 0.001 (***), p < 0.0001 (****) or marginally significant when 0.05 < p < 0.1.

After controlling the overlap between NSSI and suicidal behaviors, perfectionism was found to account for a marginally significant 1% of variance in NSSI behaviors F (2, 280) = 2.67, p < 0.10).

In addition, 58.2% (128/220) of the participants prepared for the breathing training (milestone 4), with a marginally significant difference across interventions ( P =.10).

While most of the interaction terms in Model 4 were not statistically significant, their presence in the model rendered the beta for days of rationing marginally significant ( p <0.10) and proportion of vegetated land cover statistically significant ( p <0.01), thus lending initial, though weak, support to hypothesis 2 that increased rationing was associated with increased sachet use.

There was a marginally significant effect of the interventions for energy-based FW enrichment [ F (2, 214) = 2.6; p < 0.10], but not for psychological FW enrichment [ F (2, 214) = 2.1; p > 0.10].

Negative affect was marginally significant (p=0.10) and was thus included in the next phase of the modeling.

The results were considered significant at p < 0.05 and marginally significant at 0.05 ≤ p ≤ 0.10.

We considered the results to be statistically significant at p ≤ 0.05, and marginally significant at p ≤ 0.1.

Result were considered statistically significant at P < 0.05 or marginally significant at P < 0.1.