“marginally significant”

There was a marginally significant interaction effect in the left vlPFC, F (1, 33) = 2.88, p = .099, η p 2 = .080.

In the present study, patients with CD10 expression showed a better survival rate at a marginally significant level ( p =0.0992).

A marginally significant correlation has been found between DM treatment and depression ( P value = .0992), indicating a potential relationship.

fruticosa exhibited a marginally significant positive relationship, and only in the dark photoperiod (ANOVA F 1,5 = 4.083, P = 0.0993).

A marginally significant decrease in plasma interleukin-6 levels was observed in the CgA − group ( p = 0.0995), while there was no change in the CgA + group ( p = 0.6398).

For the gap effect, children with ASD ( M = 72 ms; SD = 86) showed a marginally significant increase compared to their TD peers ( M = 36 ms; SD = 39), F (1,39) = 2.846, p = 0.0996; however, there was no significant interaction between group and distance, F (1,39) = 0.044, p = 0.834, η p 2 = 0.00 (see Figure 3 ).

We note that after merging these pairs there was still a marginally significant excess of differentially expressed OD transcripts within Cf-Inv(1) (Fisher's exact test p = 0.0996).

We additionally explored mediation of ideal smoking, ideal physical activity, and ideal nutrition, and only found marginally significant ( P <0.10) indirect effects for ideal smoking in the association of SNs and CHD events for men and women (Tables S1 and S2 ).

Although oral HPV infection was not significantly associated with having ≥ 1 site with CAL≥ 3 mm (OR = 1.7, 95% CI = 0.2–13.5) in multivariable analysis, there was a marginally significant association with CAL≥ 7 mm (OR = 2.1, 95% CI = 1.0–4.1, p < 0.10) ( Table 3 ).

Both of these effects fell short of statistical significance in multivariate analysis, although the effect of receptive language score on costs remained marginally significant (0.05<P<0.1) after adjusting for the effects of cochlear implantation and AMC on costs but not when additional adjustment for severity of PCHL was added into the model ( table 5 ).

Marginally significant differences (.05 > P < .10) were seen in the period of SCCA diagnosis in both men and women, where those diagnosed in the most recent period (2008-2012) had a lower risk of death than their counterparts diagnosed in the initial study period (2000-2007) (RER men , 0.48, 95% CI, 0.23 to 0.01; RER women , 0.68, 95% CI, 0.45 to 1.03).

Finally, despite low statistical power ( n = 3), we observed marginally significant trends ( P < 0.10) between key metabolic pathways and HIX ( Table 3 ).

Black comparison were in the marginally significant range ( p < 0.10).

Unless otherwise noted, statistical analyses were performed using the program SPSS 18.0 (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY), and differences were deemed significant when P < 0.05, and marginally significant when P < 0.10.

For each variable, if its correlation coefficient, either positive or negative, is marginally significant with p -value < 0.1, variable is selected to be included in the remainder of the process.

2009 ), we selected those remaining significant or marginally significant ( p < 0.10) in the regression model for at least one of the outcome variables in the same set.

An a priori significance threshold of α = .05 was used but marginally significant effects ( p < .10) are also reported.

In this context, our exploratory analysis suggested that PTV volume (>13 cc) was marginally significant ( p < 0.1) for toxicity, but this requires validation in the full cohort of 55 patients.

Experiencing a financial hardship was associated with a marginally significant (p < 0.10) increase in number of parental depressive symptoms.

However, this is only significant for South Africa (CI = − 0.0573; p < 0.05), and marginally significant for Zambia (CI = − 0.0341; P < 0.1) and Zimbabwe (CI = − 0.0357; p < 0.1).

After adjustment, drive-time effects attenuated substantially, with only the 21–30 min category remaining marginally significant (− 0.30 pp, p < 0.10), while the 31–45 min and > 45 min categories were no longer significant.

There was a marginally significant effect of the interventions for energy-based FW enrichment [ F (2, 214) = 2.6; p < 0.10], but not for psychological FW enrichment [ F (2, 214) = 2.1; p > 0.10].

Coefficient estimates for the model revealed a significant association with baseline negative affect ( p < .001) and a marginally significant association of drinks/week ( p = .10).

The cells marked with “a” mean significant relationships ( p < 0.05) and cells marked with “b” mean marginally significant relationships (0.05 < p < 0.1).

After adjusting for comorbidities and ADL limitations in the next model, the coefficient for the age difference became negative and was marginally significant (−.07, P < .10).