“marginally significant”

There was a marginally significant main effect of group (the remote cloud-based rehabilitation group vs the control group), F (1,160) = 2.88, P = .092, η 2 = 0.018; PPVT-R test results in cloud-based rehabilitation were significantly larger than those in the control group.

Increasing flare frequency was associated with marginally significant HAQ-DI (F=2.177, P < .092) and significantly greater mean HAQ-Pain (F=13.846, P < .001) as well as more PHQ anxiety (χ2=10.862, P < .012) and depression (χ2=7.061, P < .071). 15.5% reported past year ER/UC use, and 8.6% reported one or more hospital admissions, but neither was associated with flare frequency, perhaps due to the chronic and slowly progressive nature of IBM.

3.4 Other analyses 3.4.1 Multiple linear regression analysis 3.4.1.1 Knowledge component (R 2 = 7.7 %, F = 4.387, p = 0.002) The knowledge model identified four predictors: College stratum (Private vs Government/Aided): β = +2.69, p = 0.010 (Only statistically Significant predictor), Socioeconomic status: β = −2.12, p = 0.083 (Marginally significant, counter intuitive negative association), Sleep type: β = −2.00, p = 0.092 (Marginally significant) & Ayurveda family history: β = −2.00, p = 0.099 (Marginally significant).

Specifically, there were no significant differences in hypoxia between the T category but a marginally significant association between tumor hypoxia and metastasis status ( P = 0.092, Mann-Whitney U test, Fig. 1 B).

However, its relation with the overall survival of patients is marginally significant (Log Rank p = 0.092).

Further analysis revealed a marginally significant difference between L1 and L2 switch costs under the fearful condition ( p = 0.092), with L2 switch costs being marginally smaller than L1 switch costs, indicating a slight asymmetry between L1 and L2 switch costs under fearful emotion.

There was a modest positive correlation between α and years of education that was marginally significant ( r = 0.051, P = .092).

Expenditures on laboratory tests presented only a marginally significant association (decreased odds of 62%; p = 0.092).

This 2 × 2 ANOVA also revealed a marginally significant interaction, F (1, 164) = 2.88, p = .092, η p 2 = .02, but the pattern differed from the significant interaction with men's self-ratings.

Finally, also in the exploratory analysis of the DLS, the one-sample t- test against zero indicated a marginally significant looking bias ( M = 0.16, s.d. = 0.83) towards the correct door, t 74 = 1.71, p = 0.092, Cohen's d = 0.20.

Furthermore, face type × group interactions were significant for representational ( p = 0.047) and evoked responses ( p < 0.001) but marginally significant for liking ( p = 0.092), partially supporting hypothesis 2.

Omnibus ANOVA indicated that there is significant Anterior-posterior * Group interaction (Interaction effect: F (5.63, 95.73) = 4.5, p < 0.001) and marginally significant interaction between Group, Deviant, and Anterior-Posterior dimension (Interaction effect: F (21.41, 364.04) = 1.5, p = 0.092).

Further analysis of 8oxoG variant count in both population and sex via two-way ANOVA indicates population is significantly associated ( P < 0.0001), while sex was marginally significant ( P = 0.0922).

The logistic growth rate showed a marginally significant negative correlation ( r = − 0.3, p = 0.0925, Spearman correlation), while the maximum of infected cases did not show a strong correlation ( r = 0.02, p = 0.91, Spearman correlation) with the timing of control measures (Figs. 9 a–f).

This difference is marginally significant ( p = 0.0925).

Furthermore, the direct effect of biogas-slurry treatment on microbial diversity was marginally significant ( p = 0.093).

Filial piety stress (FPS) exhibited a marginally significant negative association with PD (H1d: β = −0.123, p = 0.093).

engaging emotions and emotion suppression [ B = 0.33, t (265.72) = 1.99, p = 0.047, 95% CI (−0.005, 0.66)] 3 , and this relationship was marginally significant for Japanese partners [ B = 0.20, t (257.22) = 1.685, p = 0.093, 95% CI (−0.033, 0.42)], but not significant for Belgian partners [ B = −0.13, t (262.56) = −1.15, p = 0.25, 95% CI (−0.37, 0.10)] 4 , 5 .

As shown in Table 3 , although some p -values were marginally significant, individuals who had received at least a senior school diploma had a 4.71-fold (RR = 4.71, p = 0.093) and 3.48-fold (RR = 3.48, p = 0.039) probability of being classified in Class 3 than in Classes 1 and 2, respectively.

The effect of age group on response time was marginally significant, with juveniles tending to have faster response time ( t = −1.943; p = 0.093; Figure 4C ). 4 Discussion In our study, contrary to our predictions, we could not detect any difference in performance between species, sexes, or age groups, as correct choices were only influenced by the different quantity combinations.

Univariate analysis demonstrated marginally significant associations between the occurrence of bleeding and both arterial hypertension ( p = 0.093) and chronic renal failure ( p = 0.086), all other demographic and medical variables showed no association.

There were marginally significant differences in the conversations with an unfamiliar person between hugging Hugvie and after rest as usual for the EDA ( p = 0.093).

Next, we conducted a two-way repeated measures ANOVA on the I A values, with the condition (three movement-focused conditions) and tapping finger as independent variables, revealing a significant main effect of condition (F 2,30 = 8.10, p = 0.002, η p 2 = 0.351) and a marginally significant main effect of tapping finger (F 3,45 = 2.27, p = 0.093, η p 2 = 0.131); they also showed a significant interaction (F 6,90 = 11.29, p < 0.001, η p 2 = 0.429).

We also observed a marginally significant negative correlation between scores on Health and food intake ( r (58) = –.222, p = .093), indicating that participants with higher scores on Health tended to consume less food.

There were marginally significant differences in cisternal CSF drainage amount and duration between patients with SDCH and without SDCH ( p =0.093 and p =0.078, respectively).