“marginally significant”

For the three features which were marginally significant for overall survival, tumors with high radial gradient border SD (Figure 1A , HR = 1.92; 95% CI 0.90-4.11, p = 0.092) and radial deviation tumor SD (Figure 1E , HR = 2.00; 95% CI 0.92-4.34, p = 0.078) were associated with poor overall survival while high radial gradient outside-tumor separation mean was associated with improved overall survival (Figure 1B , HR = 0.48; 95% CI 0.22-1.06, p = 0.068).

Specifically, there were no significant differences in hypoxia between the T category but a marginally significant association between tumor hypoxia and metastasis status ( P = 0.092, Mann-Whitney U test, Fig. 1 B).

It was interesting to note that for α3β1, there was a marginally significant difference between the expressions in the primary tumor and those in the metastatic tumor ( P =0.092).

3 , and the non-linear test was marginally significant for pre-frail transition ( p = 0.092) and not significant for frail transition ( p = 0.225).

The analysis revealed significant main effects of both gender (Wilks’ Λ = 0.85, F [4, 4271] = 187.92, p < 0.001, partial η 2 = 0.150) and grade (Wilks’ Λ = 0.96, F [12, 11300.29] = 11.630, p < 0.001, partial η 2 = 0.011, Roy’s GCR = 0.032, F [4, 4273] = 34.51, p < 0.001, partial η 2 = 0.031), with the gender x grade interaction found to be marginally significant (Wilks’ Λ = 0.99, F [12, 11300.29] = 1.57, p = 0.092, Roy’s GCR = 0.003, F (4, 4273) = 3.199, p = 0.012, partial η 2 = 0.003).

Secondary outcomes Responder analysis There is a marginally significant overall intervention effect in the percent free of HDD during the last 8 weeks (F(2,113) = 2.43, p = 0.092).

The simple effect analysis showed that the effect of the emotional type was marginally significant when the set size was 8 ( p = 0.092), while it was non-significant when the set size was 2 ( p = 0.800).

Ψ 1 ) was marginally significant ( β = .55, 95% CI −0.09 to 1.19, p = .092).

Further analysis revealed a marginally significant difference between L1 and L2 switch costs under the fearful condition ( p = 0.092), with L2 switch costs being marginally smaller than L1 switch costs, indicating a slight asymmetry between L1 and L2 switch costs under fearful emotion.

Increasing flare frequency was associated with marginally significant HAQ-DI (F=2.177, P < .092) and significantly greater mean HAQ-Pain (F=13.846, P < .001) as well as more PHQ anxiety (χ2=10.862, P < .012) and depression (χ2=7.061, P < .071). 15.5% reported past year ER/UC use, and 8.6% reported one or more hospital admissions, but neither was associated with flare frequency, perhaps due to the chronic and slowly progressive nature of IBM.

5 ), there was a marginally significant difference between the placebo ( EMM = 851, SE = 27.9, 95% CI [796–905]) and caffeine ( EMM = 825, SE = 27.9, 95% CI [771–880]) conditions, Z = 2.33, p = 0.092, and between the placebo and the concurrent flavanols and caffeine conditions ( EMM = 826, SE = 27.9, 95% CI [771–880]), Z = 2.30, p = 0.097.

Furthermore, face type × group interactions were significant for representational ( p = 0.047) and evoked responses ( p < 0.001) but marginally significant for liking ( p = 0.092), partially supporting hypothesis 2.

There was a modest positive correlation between α and years of education that was marginally significant ( r = 0.051, P = .092).

This 2 × 2 ANOVA also revealed a marginally significant interaction, F (1, 164) = 2.88, p = .092, η p 2 = .02, but the pattern differed from the significant interaction with men's self-ratings.

However, its relation with the overall survival of patients is marginally significant (Log Rank p = 0.092).

Regarding the duration of single stimulation, we found a marginally significant result that the longer the stimulus lasts, the more the craving decreases (Q=2.832, β =0.023, p =0.092) (see Figure 4 ).

For Category A, the interaction of the within-individual factor Classification with the covariate Negative Affect was marginally significant, F (3,44) = 2.29, p = 0.092, η p 2 = 0.135, but not for Category B, F (3,46) = 2.06, p = 0.120, η p 2 = 0.123.

Although maternal treatment did not influence nestling growth rate between days 3 and 7, there was a marginally significant negative relationship between maternal CORTnest and nestling growth rate ( P =0.092, Table 3 ).

In LPC (500–700 ms), the results showed that the main effect of the two conditions is marginally significant, F 1 , 45 = 2.956 , p = 0.092 , η ρ 2 = 0.062 [ 0.00 , 0.18 ] , and all participants under infelicitous contextual condition ( Μ = − 0.941 μ V ) elicited greater LPC than felicitous condition ( Μ = 0.007 μ V ) .

We find the behavior of group A to be different from the rest of the sample only regarding UG offers, and at marginally significant levels ( p = 0.092), as they offer €0.66 more (3.3% of the pie).

There was a marginally significant effect of gender (F 1,157 = 2.88; p = 0.092), with girls (M = 12.50) obtaining higher scores than boys (M = 12.50).

There was also a marginally significant interaction between congruency and consciousness, F (1,38) = 3.0, p = 0.092, η p 2 = 0.07, indicating a slightly larger congruency effect in the conscious group ( M : 5.3%), compared to the unconscious group ( M : 3.0%).

As shown in Table 3 , a statically significant association of the homozygous variant was observed with DTC (OR=1.80, 95% CI=1.03–3.14, P =0.037); moreover, the association of the homozygous variant was also significant for the FTC subgroup (OR=2.70, 95% CI=1.12–6.49, P =0.037) and marginally significant for PTC (OR=1.66, 95% CI=0.92–3.01, P =0.092).

Lastly, a marginally significant improvement in reaction times was observed in a letter 2-back transfer task following frontal stimulation (β = − .034; p < .092) across all participants.

Education At all time points, there was a greater percentage of CR+ patients who received education materials related to managing a concussion from their providers compared to CAU patients; however, only at 1 week post-enrollment was the difference marginally significant ( p = 0.092).