The fourth-corner analysis found a marginally significant trait-environmental relationship (p = 0.09), suggesting that the traits explain some of the variation in the responses of species to environmental gradients (Figure S1 ).
← all phrases
“marginally significant”
Sighted at
p>=0.1
In the literature
Although those with college or higher educational attainment were more likely to use HTPs, this relationship was marginally significant ( p = 0.09).
No significant differences were found in the TELP and control groups, except in MBI (mean change 2.5, P = 0.04) and GDS (mean change 2, P = 0.03), and a marginally significant change in MMSE (mean change 1.33, P = 0.09) in TELP.
For non-canonical sentences a marginally significant interaction of C × G was found (F(1,40) = 2.97, p = .09), which was due to a significant main effect of C for the native group only (F(1,18) = 8.56, p < .01).
For high-imageability words, the quadratic contrast was marginally significant, F (1, 51) = 2.99, p = 0.09, η 2 p = 0.06.
The overall ANOVA revealed a marginally significant main effect of Group ( F (1,32) = 2.79, p = .09, η 2 = .08), with the HMA group showing a greater positivity (e.g., at Cz mean = .80 μV, SEM = .16) than the LMA one (mean = .50 μV, SEM = .10).
A separate paired comparison of the 2-back effect (2-back versus non-return) was marginally significant, t (5) = 4.59, p = .09.
Apart from a marginally significant effect of age ( p = 0.09), no other effects or interactions were significant ( p ’s ≥ 0.13).
A marginally significant difference was observed between the control and one-area adjustment groups (p = 0.09).
month of measurement, was not statistically significant 1 minute after intake (P = 0.53), but marginally significant 15 minutes after intake (P=0.09).
Physicians that heard of ASD from either the TV or the radio were less knowledgeable about misconceptions regarding ASD than physicians who did not, however this association was marginally significant (AMS: 0.51 vs. 0.62; P = 0.09).
The chi-square test showed that the difference in employment status was marginally significant in urban and rural areas (p = 0.09) (Table 4 ).
The interaction between form realism and behavioral realism on competence was marginally significant ( F (1,198) = 2.92, p = 0.09).
There was a marginally significant main effect for film condition [ F (5,135) = 2.09, p = 0.09, ε = 0.71, η p 2 = 0.07].
3 ) decreased slightly faster for ASD (0.047/year) than TD (0.038/year), a finding that was marginally significant ( p = 0.09).
Medical workers were marginally significant sources of information among rural women (p < 0.09).
Controlling for age, sex, and education, linear mixed effects models showed a marginally significant Depression × Healthy Lifestyle Index × Time interaction (B=−0.03, SE=0.02, p=0.09).
TLE In TLE, higher exercise scores were associated with higher performance on CVLT Learning [ rho (28) = 0.38; p = 0.049], CVLT delayed recall [ rho (28) = 0.47; p = 0.01]; and VPA immediate recall [ rho (28) = 0.46; p = 0.01], of which all survived a 5 % FDR correction for multiple comparisons except for CVLT Learning, which became marginally significant after correction ( p = 0.09).
However, there was a marginally significant indirect effect (11.5%, p < 0.09) for non-citizen Latinxs only. 3.1 Sensitivity analysis Appendix Table A displays the results of current employment as a covariate in the multivariable binary logistic regression of immigration status and ethnicity with food insecurity, including sociodemographic, familial, COVID-19 stressors, and pre-pandemic SEP.
Comparison of models with and without predator measures using the reduced dataset from 1997 onwards indicated a marginally significant positive association between abundance of raptors and counts of Western Sandpiper (total raptor count: β raptors = 0.075, SE = 0.044, t = 1.70, p = 0.09) and counts of Pacific Dunlin (total raptor count: β raptors = 0.050, SE = 0.032, t = 1.53, p = 0.12). 3.4.
For negative affect, the three-way interaction between MS, MF and self-control was marginally significant ( β = 0.04, p = 0.09).
The unique effect of generating a metacognitive definition of playing was marginally significant, Wald χ 2 (1) = 2.93, p = .09.
Indeed, we examined the correlation analysis between cycling performance (i.e., mean and peak power in 10-second sprint cycling) and urinary 8-OHdG, and we found that the relationships between these exercise performances and the oxidative damage were marginally significant, respectively (mean power: r = –0.44, P = 0.09; peak power: r = –0.49, P = 0.06).
For the latency of P1, an identical ANOVA revealed a marginally significant main effect of load ( F (1,11) = 3.4, p = 0.09) with delayed latency for high vs. low loads, and a significant main effect of emotion ( F (2,10) = 4.99, p < 0.05).
Since the correlation between anxious attachment and avoidant attachment scores was marginally significant ( r = 0.146, p = 0.09), a two-way analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) with other style scores as a covariant was performed on all dependent variables.