“marginally significant”

There was marginally significant exponential decay relationships between increases in root length in the topsoil at the grain filling stage due to e[CO 2 ] and responses in grain yield ( p = 0.09) and HI ( p = 0.08), suggesting a trade-off in carbon (C) allocation between roots and above-ground biomass.

Classroom organization The interaction between stress and feasibility was marginally significant in predicting observations of teachers’ classroom organization ( B = −0.41, SE = 0.24, p = 0.09).

The difference in the failure functions was marginally significant (IR first ep = 0.00342 for Inflexal®V and 0.00179 for PEV3B respectively, p = 0.09; HR first ep = 0.48 [0.20–1.15]) ( Figure 4 ).

The test for subgroup differences in functional independence suggested a marginally significant variation in effects ( χ 1 2 =2.93; P =.09), indicating that intervention duration may be a potential contributor to the overall heterogeneity of the meta-analysis, albeit not reaching formal statistical significance, while the point estimate still favored shorter intervention duration (SMD 0.67, 95% CI 0.12-1.23; I 2=0%; P= .72; Figure 8 ).

For non-canonical sentences a marginally significant interaction of C × G was found (F(1,40) = 2.97, p = .09), which was due to a significant main effect of C for the native group only (F(1,18) = 8.56, p < .01).

The independent Mann-Whitney U -test of task performance data (accuracy and RT) revealed marginally significant difference ( p = 0.090 and 0.068), with a bit lower accuracy and longer reaction time in MCI patients.

We found a (partial) correlation of −0.26, which was marginally significant ( p = 0.09), indicating that our assessment of the SZ patients' degree of exploitation may, to some extent, reflect the severity of their positive psychotic symptoms.

Using these Replication Scan values, an inverse correlation with participants' expected benefit scores was observed, which was marginally significant when examined alone, r (17) = −0.41, p = 0.09, but was significant after controlling for age and sex, r (17) = −0.51, p <0.05 ( Fig. 2 , bottom row).

In chitosan-treated plants, peroxidase activity in the shoot (0.66 ± 0.11 ΔOD/min·mg protein) was not different from that in control plants but was doubly increased in root tissues (30.80 ± 8.06 ΔOD/min·mg protein) with a marginally significant difference (p-value = 0.09) as relative to control.

Giving instrumental support was marginally significant ( p = .09).

The difference was marginally significant between unbiased and XX-biased genes ( W = 2,692,000; p = 0.09).

Results Wait duration, justice perceptions, and aggressive tendencies The regression analyses confirmed a marginally significant positive influence of wait duration on aggressive tendencies (β = 0.55, p = 0.09), partially supporting Hypothesis 1.

This difference is statistically significant for the contrast with high school–educated women ( p < .001) and marginally significant for the contrast with women without high school education ( p = .09).

S2C, D ); the Shannon index showed a marginally significant difference between the two groups ( p = 0.09 for male and p = 0.07 for female, Supplementary Fig.

When all participants were included, regardless of having seen the nudge, the effect of condition was marginally significant, F (2,254) = 2.43, p = 0.090, η p 2 = 0.02.

The difference in the mean±SD age was marginally significant (p=0.09) between the IPD and no-IPD groups (37.89±2.61 vs 37.35±2.37).

A follow-up analysis examining the effects of APOE4 on pain unpleasantness adjusting for differences in stimulus intensity at each percept level across genetic groups indicated that the pattern of results was little changed, with the APOE4 main effect becoming marginally significant ( p < 0.09) but the overall effect size increasing slightly (from d = 0.26 to d = 0.33).

There was a marginally significant effect of action-congruency, F (1, 15) = 3.41, p = .09; η 2 = .19; and no significant effect of movement-congruency, F (1, 15) = .02, p = .90; η 2 = .00.

A marginally significant difference was observed between the control and one-area adjustment groups (p = 0.09).

9, p < 0.05) and marginally significant differences between congruent versus neutral ( t = 1.87, p = 0.09) and neutral versus incongruent ( t = 1.89, p = 0.09) trial latencies across subjects 3.2 Saccade amplitude and direction No significant variation was found in the amplitude of the primary saccade dependent upon trial type (Congruent, Incongruent, Neutral) ( F (2, 18) = 0.067).

When order was added to the model, there was only a marginally significant finding between video condition and post-peak decline in oxytocin, b = 0.005, SE = 0.003, p = 0.09.

Visual inspection of funnel plots suggested the presence of a marginally significant publication bias and of small‐study effect, confirmed by the Egger test ( P =0.09) only for the outcome of any adverse event.

The diversity including richness and Shannon diversity were lower in subjects treated by antibiotics within five days vs subjects who did not ( S6 Fig .), with a marginally significant difference on richness (p = 0.09 for richness and 0.18 for Shannon diversity), suggesting IV antibiotic treatment may influence the complexity of the premature infant intestinal microbiome.

The moderating effect of gender on the relationship between mindfulness and cognitive reappraisal was marginally significant ( b = −0.02, p = 0.09).

In addition, the mTBI group showed a marginally significant trend toward lower SIRT1 levels than the than the control (p = 0.090) and KD (p = 0.077) groups.