“marginally significant”

Although marginally significant ( p = 0.001), the height of transgenic plants was only 8% lower than that of Columbia compared to ∼40% reduction seen in 3KO plants (Figure 1 E).

A three-way ANOVA revealed marginally significant effects of pattern (F = 4.07, p = 0.052) and curing temperature (F = 3.48, p = 0.071), as well as a highly significant interaction between pattern and temperature (F = 12.28, p = 0.001), indicating that increasing the curing temperature from 75 °C to 90 °C substantially enhances the benefit of the hexagonal suction-cup geometry.

The magnitudes of effects for these respondents who believe that an HIV-positive teacher should continue teaching attenuated by 10% and further 5% with the introduction of demographic and socioeconomic measures respectively, turning the previously highly significant estimate (OR=1.46, p≤0.001) into significant (OR=1.31, p≤0.05) and marginally significant (OR=1.24, p≤0.10) when comparing the coefficients in Model 1 to Model 2 and Model 2 to Model 3.

In line with these results, mosquitoes fed with dsCHIK1 did not show any significant reduction in viral titers after infection with CHIKV, whereas mosquitoes injected with dsCHIK1 showed reduced viral titers in whole bodies two days post-infection and marginally significant reduced titers five days post-infection ( Figures S5 A–S5C, Kruskal-Wallis test on log-transformed viral titers: day 2 p < 0.001; day 5 p = 0.04; Kruskal-Wallis test on prevalence: day 2 p = 0.18; day 5 p = 0.07; see Table S2 for individual comparisons).

However, the predicted interaction between compensation and nation remained marginally significant, although the effect of compensation was slightly stronger among Americans, t (50) = 12.15, p < 0.001, d = 1.63, than among Japanese t (49) = 8.54, p < 0.001, d = 1.22.

S3 ) than the corresponding distractor emotions, although this comparison was barely or marginally significant in orangutans (rate: humans χ 2 = 21.25, df = 1, p < 0.001, orangutans χ 2 = 3.91, df = 1, p = 0.048; duration: humans χ 2 = 27.85, df = 1, p < 0.001, orangutans χ 2 = 3.37, df = 1, p = 0.066).

Specifically for Northern Europe, there is a marginally significant ( P =0.06) warming despite a highly significant ( P <0.001) decrease in zonal wind ( Table 1 ), the latter implying a more easterly flow regime typically linked to colder winter temperatures.

Also, the interactions among all factors were significant or marginally significant: static/dynamic conditions and d 1 : F ( 1 , 4 ) = 18.3 , p < 0.001 , partial η 2 = 0.27 (large); static/dynamic conditions and r d : F ( 1 , 2 ) = 3.24 , p = 0.04 < 0.05 , partial η 2 = 0.03 (small); d 1 and r d : F ( 1 , 7 ) = 6.26 , p < 0.001 , partial η 2 = 0.18 (large); these three factors: F ( 1 , 7 ) = 1.76 , p = 0.097 < 0.10 , partial η 2 = 0.06 (middle).

In terms of pupillary response, the 4°C–10°C group exhibited a significant difference in pupil diameter, whereas this was marginally significant in the 10°C–4°C group (4°C–10°C: p < 0.001; 10°C–4°C: p = 0.062).

A probability of p < 0.10 was considered as marginally significant, of p < 0.05 as significant, of p < 0.01 as highly significant and of p < 0.001 as extremely significant.

For English musicians and non-musicians, the results revealed significant or marginally significant main effects of the following variables: vowel quality [χ 2 (1) = 43.46, p < 0.001], duration [χ 2 (1) = 6341.9, p < 0.001] and pitch direction [χ 2 (1) = 3.52, p = 0.06].

A main effect of session was also significant or marginally significant (cooling, Pz: F(4,72) = 5.4, p < 0.001, T3: F(4,72) = 2.9, p = 0.028, T4: F(4,72) = 5.0, p = 0.0013; heating, Pz: F(4,72) = 2.2, p = 0.076, T3: F(4,72) = 4.2, p = 0.0040, T4: F(4,72) = 7.1, p < 0.001).

In model 1, 2 and 3, the association between hemoglobin (Hb) and diabetic lower extremity ulcers (DLEU) was marginally significant [OR: 0.74, 95% CI: (0.65-0.84); p<0.001] [OR: 0.76, 95% CI: (0.67-0.86); p<0.001] [OR: 0.76, 95% CI: (0.66-0.86); p<0.001], respectively.

Specifically, for risk scores <0.032, the association was marginally significant (P = 0.035), while for risk scores ≥0.032, the association was highly significant (P < 0.001) ( Figure 3 ).

1.7%; RR 1.62; 95% CI: 1.00–2.60; P=0.05; I 2 =7%; Figure 3D ) reached a marginally significant difference, the incidence of vocal cord palsy (2.9% vs. 0.77%; RR 3.64; 95% CI: 1.96–6.78; P<0.001; I 2 =0; Figure 4A ), and total complication rate (11.5% vs. 8.0%; RR 1.45; 95% CI: 1.20–1.74; P<0.001; I 2 =0; Figure 4B ) were significantly higher in 4LND+ patients.

Correlations between Urinary Metals, U-PHE, and 8-oxodG Significant, or marginally significant, linear correlations were found between 8-oxodG and the following metals: Mn (r = 0.354, p = 0.001), Tl (r = 0.321, p = 0.002), Zn (r = 0.309, p = 0.003), As (r = 0.309, p = 0.003), Pb (r = 0.283, p = 0.007), Co (r = 0.239, p = 0.024), Ba (r=0.213, p = 0.045), Cr (r = 0.213, p = 0.045), and Cd (r = 0.194, p = 0.071).

The database provides the following information: (i) In addition to all the GVs annotated in the NHGRI GWAS Catalog, we manually curated the GVs that are marginally significant ( P < 1.0 × 10 −3 ) collected from supplementary materials of each original publication.

In a regression analysis, with classification accuracy as the outcome variable, model type and number of hidden states were highly significant regressors ( p < 0.001), and the number of networks was marginally significant ( p = 0.07) ( Supporting Information Table S1 ).

Marginally significant differences existed between T2 sound earlier and T2 sound later conditions ( t (68) = −3.38, p = 0.001, Cohen’s D = −0.81, 95% CI = [−0.276, −0.071]).

Intraclass correlation TD and TD siblings The intraclass correlation analyses showed a significant similarity in the left stria terminalis for RD (ICC = 0.772, P < 0.001) and a marginally significant correlation for FA (ICC = 0.704, P = 0.001) among typical siblings.

One day after the transplant (i.e., day 1), variation in gut microbial community composition were mainly explained by the inoculum effect, while the recipient genotype only had a marginally significant effect ( p = 0.001 and 0.062, respectively; permutation MANOVA; Fig. 5b ).

We considered the following levels of significance for p -values: (1) highly significant ( p ≤ 0.001), (2) significant ( p < 0.05), (3) marginally significant or trend-level significant (0.05 ≤ p ≤ 0.07), and (4) not significant.

The analysis showed a marginally significant group effect (Wald χ 2 = 3.820, P = 0.051), a highly significant time effect (Wald χ 2 = 760.909, P < 0.001), and no significant group-by-time interaction (Wald χ 2 = 2.325, P = 0.676).

When examining costs, switch targets showed marginally significant restart costs [ t (21) = 1.99, p = 0.059, Cohen's d = 0.20], while repeat targets showed highly significant restart costs [ t (21) = 5.60, p < 0.001, Cohen's d = 0.43].

The difference in JND was highly significant after adaptation to fast translational motion (baseline vs 20 Hz translation: p < 0.001) and marginally significant after adaptation to fast circular motion (baseline vs 20 Hz circular: p = 0.06).