“marginally significant”

4a ), we found a significant interaction between time-period and layer effects ( F = 30.34, P = 0.0004) at 10–25 Hz and a marginally significant interaction ( F = 3.90, P = 0.080) and period effect ( F = 3.75, P = 0.085) at 25–40 Hz (Supplementary Fig. 4a ), as well as a significant layer effect during the cue and delay periods (Fig. 3b ; F = 11.58, P = 0.0078 for cue; F = 5.54, P = 0.043 for delay).

It showed marginally significant association in the multivariable analysis (hazard ratio, 1.04; 95% CI, 0.98–1.09; p=0.08) ( Supplementary Table 4 ), suggesting that preoperative NLR is more strongly associated with early mortality than with late mortality.

For perceived emotional challenge, the differences were marginally significant [ t (26) = 1.84, p = 0.08, 95% CI (–0.06, 1.03)], with interactivity enhancing the experience, being higher in Gameplay ( M = 4.31, SD = 0.63) than in GameWatch ( M = 3.83, SD = 0.75).

The interaction of these factors shows a marginally significant increase in leaf-cutting (GLMM, z = 1.712, p = 0.08).

subterraneus workers in the nest without fungus revealed a significant difference between the two castes: large workers engaged in more “social behaviors” than small workers, although this difference was marginally significant (U = 56; p < 0.08).

neutral) stimuli, in both visual and olfactory modalities, decreased d’ and thus impeded discrimination between healthy and unhealthy food [ t (15) = −3.16, p < 0.01; disgust d’ = 1.91 (0.78); neutral d’ = 2.11 (0.62)] whereas an opposite, marginally significant trend emerged for the social stimuli: social disgust (vs. neutral) stimuli increased d’ [ t (15) = 1.89, p = 0.08; disgust d’ = 2.11 (0.72); neutral d’ = 1.98 (0.77)] and thus improved food healthiness discrimination.

The mean number of barriers reported was significantly ( P < 0.05) higher for women compared to men in the 60–69 year age groups and marginally significant in the 70–79 and 80 years and over groups ( P = 0.08).

In fact, there was a marginally significant interaction ( p = 0.080) between closeness and the group/personal discrepancy in the prediction of national identification that was negative rather than positive.

Negative affectivity A marginally significant main effect of time (intercept) reflected a tendency for trait NA scores to decrease from baseline to post-treatment across groups (pooled t (144) = 1.76, p = .08, partial η 2 = 0.02).

A 2 × 2 mixed ANOVA based on geLEAS self scores revealed a marginally significant effect of group, F (1, 109) = 3.17, p < 0.08, ηp2 = 0.03.

Finally, in the cross-sectional analysis, we only observed a marginally significant difference in HpVR between the two groups ( t = 1.9, p = 0.08).

The addition of NPA reduced direct transport through the outer compartment (i.e., 3 H-IAA supply to and recovery from the outer compartment; Figure 6 ) at a level that was marginally significant (p-value = 0.08; one-tailed paired t-test comparing IAA and IAA + NPA movement through the outer compartment).

In this school-level OLS regression model ( N = 20), the interaction term was marginally significant (B = −0.08, p = 0.08).

There was no significant association between Heartbeat Perception Task score and state anxiety ( r = 0.17, p = 0.31), but a marginally significant correlation was found between the heartbeat perception score and the level of trait anxiety ( r = 0.28, p = 0.08).

For a number of species, this interaction was marginally significant (F 64.7 = 2.04, p = 0.08).

There was only a marginally significant overt TB×Gata3 mit-stim interaction when the analysis was restricted to adult males ( p = .08).

time to relapse) were marginally significant, as it can be seen in Figure 2 ( E & G ) (p = 0.08, CI = 90% and p = 0.05, CI = 95% respectively).

However, they showed marginally significant differences in the post-TSST measure, t (78) = 1.75, p = 0.08, Cohen’s d = 0.4, with Excess weight participants performing significantly poorer than Normal weight controls.

Pauses (In-Air Pen Duration) Between the Preposition and the Article 2 The orthographic consistency factor had a marginally significant effect in the analysis conducted on in-air pen duration (or pause) between the preposition and the article 2 , F (1,18.313) = 3.28, p = 0.08 ( Estimate = 24.39, SE = 18.31).

aegypti was marginally significant for temperature (χ 2 = 6.67, df = 3, p = 0.08).

Additionally, the interaction of previous accuracy in the flanker task and interval was marginally significant, F (1,28) = 3.17, p = 0.08, showing larger PES in the short interval condition (22 ms) compared to the long interval condition (8 ms).

Consequently, the small-worldness parameter was found to be greater in the CON network than in the BC network and the observed difference was marginally significant ( P = 0.08 ).

3.1.2 Associations with previous institutionalization There was a marginally significant main effect of Group (b = −17.23, ꭓ2(1)= 3.06, p = .080), such that RTs tended to be slower among the PI versus Comp youth over and above the main effects of Stimulus and Block.

However, the evidence for the relationship of roe deer visitations and ambient temperature was marginally significant ( r = −0.14, p = .08).

There was a significant correlation between posterior DMN connectivity and overall mean cortical flortaucipir SUVr in the DLB group ( r = −0.39, P = 0.04), while this was marginally significant in the Alzheimer’s disease dementia group ( r = −0.35, P = 0.08) and there was no significant correlation in the control group ( r = −0.13, P = 0.20; Fig. 3A ).