“marginally significant”

neutral) stimuli, in both visual and olfactory modalities, decreased d’ and thus impeded discrimination between healthy and unhealthy food [ t (15) = −3.16, p < 0.01; disgust d’ = 1.91 (0.78); neutral d’ = 2.11 (0.62)] whereas an opposite, marginally significant trend emerged for the social stimuli: social disgust (vs. neutral) stimuli increased d’ [ t (15) = 1.89, p = 0.08; disgust d’ = 2.11 (0.72); neutral d’ = 1.98 (0.77)] and thus improved food healthiness discrimination.

4a ), we found a significant interaction between time-period and layer effects ( F = 30.34, P = 0.0004) at 10–25 Hz and a marginally significant interaction ( F = 3.90, P = 0.080) and period effect ( F = 3.75, P = 0.085) at 25–40 Hz (Supplementary Fig. 4a ), as well as a significant layer effect during the cue and delay periods (Fig. 3b ; F = 11.58, P = 0.0078 for cue; F = 5.54, P = 0.043 for delay).

PCoA plots by Bray–Curtis distance revealed a marginally significant difference in microorganism composition between the benefit and resistance groups (adonis P = 0.08) but no significant difference between the benefit group and the severe irAE group (adonis P = 0.91).

For the alpha frequency band, this test revealed a marginally significant negative cluster 2–2.5 s after sentence onset (max sum = -288.07, p < 0.08).

The analysis revealed a marginally significant main effect of the condition contrast, β = .19, p = .080, qualified by a significant interaction with PNS, β = –.28, p = .036.

inconsistent) × 6 (electrode sites: F1, FZ, F2, FC1, FCZ, FC2) design reveals that the main effect of information comprehensibility is marginally significant, F (1, 22) = 23.74, p = 0.08, the main effect of information consistency is not significant, F (1, 22) = 0.10, p = 0.75, the interaction effect between information comprehensibility and information consistency is significant, F (1, 22) = 12.17, p < 0.001, the main effect of electrode sites is significant, F (1, 22) = 5.49, p = 0.003, showing no interaction effect between information comprehensibility and electrode sites, F (1, 22) = 0.64, p = 0.68, and no interaction effect between information consistency and electrode sites, F (1, 22) = 0.44, p = 0.82.

This trend was marginally significant (ANOVA p = 0.08) in the 0–2 cm depth interval (Figure 1 ; n = 6 N-fertilized vs. n = 6 unfertilized samples, However, gene copy number normalized per gdw was not significantly different among treatments in the 0–2 cm depth interval (data not shown).

A marginally significant ( P =.08) difference was noted in the sexual life subscale.

The reduction in pain intensity was marginally significant after adjusting for baseline values (P = 0.08) and there was no significant difference between the two groups after adjusting for all covariates (P = 0.11).

We found that interdependence significantly increased with relatedness in the 48 hr experiments [both, r 2 (44)>0.11, p<0.02], and this was marginally significant in the 5 min experiments [both r 2 (44)<0.06, 0.07<p < 0.08] ( Figure 3B ).

The high-performing subgroup had marginally significant greater RT Costs on Day 2 [t (22) = -1.79, p = .08, Cohen's d = .-.733] as well as on Day 10 [t (22) = -2.07, p = .05, Cohen's d = .-.846], but not on Day 1, [t (22) = -1.30, p = .21, Cohen's d = .-.533].

The difference between conditions following the interaction task ( F (1, 38) = 12.07, p = .001, η 2 = 0.24) is the result of a marginally significant decrease in mood in the ostracism condition (pre: M = 4.35, SD = 0.62; post: M = 3.99, SD = 0.82; p = .08, d = 0.51, 95% CI d [−0.17, 1.18]), and a significant increase in mood in the control condition (pre: M = 4.21, SD = 0.74; post: M = 4.65, SD = 0.31; p = .03, d = 0.90, 95% CI d [0.21, 1.58]). 3.3 Priming drink manipulation The priming drink was successful in dosing participants to the intended target BrAC of 0.03, assessed prior to the beer taste-test ( M = 0.027, SD = 0.012).

A wilcoxon signed rank test on residuals indicates that asterids I are marginally significant ( p = 0.08) for lacking diversity (two sided, μ = 0) but other groups (gymnosperms, p = 0.25; magnoliids, p = 0.20; rosids I, p = 0.97; rosids II, p = 0.63; asterids II, p = 0.63) show no detectable biases in diversity.

This association was marginally significant for caregiver report ( p = 0.08).

There was a significant difference in sessile polychaete biomass among treatments (One-way ANOVA, p = 0.03), and post-hoc tests revealed a significant difference between the low-density aquaculture and natural treatments (Tukey’s post-hoc test, p = 0.03), a marginally significant difference between high-density aquaculture and natural (p = 0.08), and no difference between low- and high- density aquaculture (p = 0.89; Table 1 ; Fig 3B ).

Analyses of the contrasts of physically different saturation levels (LS versus HS) did not yield any significant regions associated with D 2 BP ND values of any subdivisions of striatum, but the D 2 BP ND value of left executive striatum in the objective faded condition (LS) versus the objective vivid condition (HS) contrast correlated with the left parietal cortex (left inferior parietal lobule (BA 40)) at a marginally significant level (cluster level of p = 0.08, FDR corrected), which overlapped with the left parietal cortex found in subjective faded condition (overlapped region was presented in Supplementary Fig.

Negative affectivity A marginally significant main effect of time (intercept) reflected a tendency for trait NA scores to decrease from baseline to post-treatment across groups (pooled t (144) = 1.76, p = .08, partial η 2 = 0.02).

Age was marginally significant (Wald χ2 = 3.070, p = .080).

There was a marginally significant interaction among process, time, and context ( F (6,144) = 1.87, P = 0.08, η 2 = 0.07).

There was a marginally significant association between HCC and executive functions (r = ‐0.41, p = 0.08).

For RT scores, there was a significant main effect of rumination on NA ( β = .25, SE = .04, p <.01), and the interaction between rumination and the RT scores of the emotional n -back was marginally significant ( β = −.07, SE = .04, p = .08).

The main effect of Period was marginally significant ( F (1, 55) = 3.22, p = .08, η p 2 = .06), which indicated that VC was higher before the pandemic than after.

There was a marginally significant increase in Mest in the maternal hypothalamus during gestation associated with paternal FR ( t 12 = −1.68, p = 0.08; figure 1 c ).

time to relapse) were marginally significant, as it can be seen in Figure 2 ( E & G ) (p = 0.08, CI = 90% and p = 0.05, CI = 95% respectively).

The addition of NPA reduced direct transport through the outer compartment (i.e., 3 H-IAA supply to and recovery from the outer compartment; Figure 6 ) at a level that was marginally significant (p-value = 0.08; one-tailed paired t-test comparing IAA and IAA + NPA movement through the outer compartment).