aureus at the same time point ( Figure 3D ), only three of the extract contents of TW and TA showed statistically significant differences: 0.04 ( p < 0.001), 0.08 ( p = 0.002), and 1.25 mg/mL ( p = 0.008), and an additional 0.63 mg/mL showed a marginally significant difference ( p = 0.074).
← all phrases
“marginally significant”
Sighted at
p>=0.1
In the literature
Repeated-measures ANOVA on PANSS and all its subscales showed a marginally significant interaction effect (group × time: F = 2.2, df = 1, 39, p = 0.074), nonsignificant group effect ( F = 0.74, df = 1, 39, p = 0.48), and time effect ( F = 1.6, df = 4, 39, p = 0.28).
Specifically, in males, the diameter of mGGO reached statistical significance ( P = 0.0357), while in females, it was marginally significant ( P = 0.0745) (Table 6 ).
The difference was marginally significant ( p = 0.0747).
Additionally, patients with liver metastasis had marginally significant shortest PFS compared with those with other metastatic patterns ( P = 0.0748) and numerically shortest OS; though, the statistical significance was not reached ( P = 0.1598).
The full-null comparison was marginally significant ( χ 2 = 6.9, d.f. = 3, N = 24, p = 0.075).
The equivalence test showed that the equivalence between the online repetition and laboratory conditions was marginally significant, t (31.40) = 1.48, p = 0.075.
The main effect of probe type was marginally significant [ F (1, 144) = 3.21, p = 0.075, η p 2 = 0.02].
In our study we found an inpatient mortality risk increase of about 16%, although this result was marginally significant ( p = 0.075) after adjustment for age, sex and admission triage codes.
Similarly, there was a marginally significant correlation between change in chest expansion on unequal trials and self-attributed emotion in response to the unequal outcome, r = 0.13, p = 0.075, which was of a similar magnitude after controlling for age in a partial correlation, r = 0.12, p = 0.09.
SCH administration of the second-rank mice also decreased DS of the first-rank mice ( P <.001 in BASE vs SCH, P <.001 in SAL vs SCH; Figure 1c ) and increased DS of the fourth-rank mice ( P =.001 in SAL vs SCH; BASE vs SCH was marginally significant with P =.075; Figure 1c ) within the same groups.
The results showed that no significant variation was observed for Ago1 and Ago2 ( Figure 2 , p > 0.05, df = 4) and a marginally significant increase for Translin ( Figure 2 , p = 0.075, df = 4).
The results showed a marginally significant interaction between time and group [ F (1,64) = 3.286, p = 0.075, η p 2 = 0.050]; this result supported the second hypothesis that students from the experimental group improved more on creativity than those from the control group ( Table 2 ).
It revealed a significant culture effect, F (1, 92) = 11.50, p <.001, η p 2 = .11, which was modulated by a marginally significant culture by target level interaction, F (1, 92) = 3.24, p = .075, η p 2 = .03.
A main effect between study partner concerns and baseline participant entorhinal tau burden was marginally significant ( t = 2.14, adj. p = 0.075), trending toward greater study partner-reported concerns for participants who had greater entorhinal tau burden at baseline.
However, lymph vascular invasion was marginally significant in both groups ( P = .075).
Although the overall significance of SP1 expression decreased in multivariate analysis, the hazard ratio indicated a marginally significant correlation between low SP1 expression and overall survival in intestinal-type cancer (hazard ratio = 0.603, P = 0.075).
There was a marginally significant main effect of question type, F (1, 69) = 3.26, P = 0.075, η p 2 = 0.05, a significant main effect of affect, F (2, 69) = 3.33, P = 0.042, η p 2 = 0.09, and a significant interaction between both factors, F (2, 69) = 3.74, P = 0.029, η p 2 = 0.10.
Further correlation analyses between true recognition and target-lure classification revealed that there was a significant positive correlation in young adults, r (25) = 0.39, p = 0.046, whereas there was a marginally significant negative correlation in older adults, r (25) = −0.35, p = 0.075.
There was, however, only a marginally significant reduction in the pro- portion of children who had a blood lead concentration of 15 g/dL or higher (p = 0.075).
This permutation test also identified a marginally significant cluster of activity from 380 to 430 ms ( p = 0.075; 10,000 permutations), corroborated by a marginal main effect of number of words according to a 2×2 repeated-measures ANOVA on activity during this time window ( F (1,17) = 3.52; p = 0.078; two-word canonical: 3.72 nAm avg.
However, the estimate of association between shingles and family history of AD was marginally significant in validation (OR [95% CI] = 1.047 [0.995, 1.101], P = 0.075), and the point estimate direction was opposite to primary analysis.
Apart from traditional, all therapy modes at 130% eCAPT drove hyperemia responses significantly greater (p ≤ 0.0046, t 142 ≥ 3.701) than control (no SCS) with an average ΔSBV in the range of 15–20% relative to baseline (note: MF was marginally significant with p = 0.075, t 142 = 2.775, after Bonferroni-Holm correction).
We found a marginally significant trend where participants informed about the effects of N 2 O showed only slightly increased intentions to reduce consumption [ β = 0.932, t (190.386) = 1.792, p = 0.075].
For Norm Sensitivity, stress ( t (332) = −3.62, p < 0.001) had a significant effect, while the effect of sex was marginally significant ( t (332) = 1.79, p = 0.075).