The model with the Digit Span score as moderator was marginally significant ( F (3,77) = 2.40, p = 0.074, R 2 = 0.086) and the ANT and Stroop scores did not significantly moderate the relationship between age group and placebo hypoalgesia (both F < 1.45, p > 0.236).
← all phrases
“marginally significant”
Sighted at
p>=0.1
In the literature
The patients were dichotomized into lower and higher groups according to an LRR of 1.8, and there was a marginally significant difference in the ALP at POD 30 and the ALP ratio at POD 30 vs. 0 between the higher and lower LRR groups ( Table 3 , p = 0.074 and 0.082, respectively).
Spheroids from fast-relaxing gels did also trend toward increased growth, with a marginally significant p value = 0.074.
The difference in the Apgar score at 5 min between the two groups was marginally significant ( p = 0.074).
Our manipulation check indicated that participants in the coping potential affirmation condition ( M = 3.34, SD = .76) appraised their coping potential more favorably than those in the control condition ( M = 3.12, SD = .72); this effect was marginally significant, t (141) = −1.80, p = .074.
The survival benefit of LND in patients without evidence of vascular invasion was marginally significant ( P = 0.074, Fig. 4 ).
Subsequent analysis using a Cox regression model revealed a marginally significant association (HR: 0.21, 95% CI: 0.04-1.17, P = 0.074), indicating a 79% lower risk of extended hospitalization among patients not administered vancomycin.
The interaction effect of PD × LOC was marginally significant for DSUD (β = 0.27, p = 0.074) but was significant for DSUF (β = 0.47, p < 0.001).
A marginally significant interaction effect between emotion and group was observed ( F (2.32) = 2.51, p = 0.074).
Multigroup modeling using the main model indicated a significant sex difference in the effect of potassium excretion on depression [Δχ 2 (1) = 8.150, P = 0.004] and a marginally significant sex difference for sodium excretion [Δχ 2 (1) = 3.196, P = 0.074].
Follow-up paired t-tests were marginally significant for 1-back performance at the 4-week dose (t(28) = 1.86, p = .074, d = 0.35) and statistically significant at 8-weeks (t(27) = 3.36, p = .002, d = 0.65) and 12-weeks (t(24) = 3.37, p = .003, d = 0.65).
In the present study, previous history of fracture was identified as an independent risk factor for females and increased 3.68-time risk of ankle fracture, and marginally significant for males (P = 0.074).
However, tritan thresholds did reveal a significant age effect [χ 2 (4)tritan = 12.70, p = 0.013], though post hoc (Dunn-Bonferroni) tests revealed only a marginally significant difference between two age groups ([30;40[vs [40;50[; p = 0.074).
The mean activated intensities in the SMG showed a marginally significant main effect of group (ASD: L 13.71 ± 7.18, R 13.51 ± 5.60; TD: L 9.95 ± 2.31, R 11.60 ± 4.36; F (1, 41) = 3.36; p = 0.074; η p 2 = 0.08; Fig. 6 a), which showed that the response of the ASD group was enhanced to a significantly greater extent in the left hemisphere than that of the TD group ( p < 0.05; η p 2 = 0.10), without any inter-group differences in the right hemisphere ( p > 0.346).
There was slightly more support for the model including both of those terms, though evaluation of the best model indicated that both variables had only a marginally significant effect on relative abundance ( day , P = 0.074; length , P = 0.088; Supplementary Fig.
Subsequently, a repeated-measures ANOVA with the within-subjects factor session (session 1–5) and the between-subjects factor optotype (Landolt-C versus Tumbling-E) was conducted and revealed a marginally significant main effect of session (F [3.05, 64.03] = 2.4; p = 0.074; η 2 = 0.10; Huynh-Feldt corrected), but neither a significant main effect of optotype (F [1, 21] = 0.31; p = 0.58; η 2 = 0.015) nor a significant interaction between session and optotype (F [3.05, 64.03] = 0.93; p = 0.43; η 2 = 0.04; Huynh-Feldt corrected).
A marginally significant main effect of the visual status ( p = .074) showed that late blind participants tended to learn faster in comparison to their sighted counterparts.
The overall sample also showed a significant decrease in BMD (p = 0.004), while the group with U-Cd levels of 2–4.99 μg/g creatinine showed a marginally significant decrease (p = 0.074).
A marginally significant CO and HE interaction was found for the last of the three intervals (433–500 ms; F(1, 7) = 4.408; p = 0.074).
A linear mixed-effects model with SCS scores as the dependent variable revealed a marginally significant Group × Time interaction effect via Type III Wald F tests ( F = 2.66, p = 0.074) (see Table 3 ).
The association of higher residential density with better physical health QoL was stronger in older adults who engaged in leisure PA (b = 2.87, P = 0.046), with a marginally significant for those who were physically active overall (b = 2.09, P = 0.074) than those who were not active ( Table 3 ).
late bin) and the preceding treatment ( rn 04 vs. rn 06 ) was marginally significant, with F (1,33) = 3.400; p = .074.
perienced significantly (P<0.001) higher rates of collapse than trees of forms 3–7, (2) large trees with cavities within old growth stands were significantly (P = 0.009) less likely to collapse than trees within 1939-aged stands and ∼20-year old stands, and (3) trees on high productivity sites were marginally significant (P = 0.074) more likely to collapse than trees on low productivity sites ( Supplementary Information S3 ).
Pre-registered traditional ANOVAs For ERPs time-locked to inflection onset, repeated measures ANOVAs on the four quadrants revealed a marginally significant prediction-mismatch effect [ F (1,186) = 3.21, p = .074, mean difference = −.14 μV, 95% CI = (–.01, .29), Cohen's d = .168], reflecting, on average, less positive voltage for the mismatching condition than for the matching condition (match, M = .62 μV, SD = 1.17; mismatch, M = .48 μV, SD = 1.05).
However, Tukey’s post hoc tests revealed no differences between specific education levels, except for a marginally significant difference ( p = 0.074) in the ranking of Idea 8 ( popular people ) between secondary education (HAVO, n = 23, M = 5.74) and university students ( n = 167, M = 4.40). 4.